• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于凸透镜成像与狼群捕食仿生算法相结合的视觉传感器标定优化方法研究

Research on the Optimization Method of Visual Sensor Calibration Combining Convex Lens Imaging with the Bionic Algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation.

作者信息

Wu Qingdong, Miao Jijun, Liu Zhaohui, Chang Jiaxiu

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China.

Shandong Luqiao Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 12;24(18):5926. doi: 10.3390/s24185926.

DOI:10.3390/s24185926
PMID:39338671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11435693/
Abstract

To improve the accuracy of camera calibration, a novel optimization method is proposed in this paper, which combines convex lens imaging with the bionic algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation (CLI-WPP). During the optimization process, the internal parameters and radial distortion parameters of the camera are regarded as the search targets of the bionic algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation, and the reprojection error of the calibration results is used as the fitness evaluation criterion of the bionic algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation. The goal of optimizing camera calibration parameters is achieved by iteratively searching for a solution that minimizes the fitness value. To overcome the drawback that the bionic algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation is prone to fall into local optimal, a reverse learning strategy based on convex lens imaging is introduced to transform the current optimal individual and generate a series of new individuals with potential better solutions that are different from the original individual, helping the algorithm out of the local optimum dilemma. The comparative experimental results show that the average reprojection errors of the simulated annealing algorithm, Zhang's calibration method, the sparrow search algorithm, the particle swarm optimization algorithm, bionic algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation, and the algorithm proposed in this paper (CLI-WPP) are 0.42986500, 0.28847656, 0.23543161, 0.219342495, 0.10637477, and 0.06615037, respectively. The results indicate that calibration accuracy, stability, and robustness are significantly improved with the optimization method based on the CLI-WPP, in comparison to the existing commonly used optimization algorithms.

摘要

为提高相机标定的精度,本文提出了一种新的优化方法,该方法将凸透镜成像与狼群捕食仿生算法(CLI-WPP)相结合。在优化过程中,将相机的内部参数和径向畸变参数作为狼群捕食仿生算法的搜索目标,将标定结果的重投影误差作为狼群捕食仿生算法的适应度评价标准。通过迭代搜索使适应度值最小的解来实现相机标定参数的优化目标。为克服狼群捕食仿生算法容易陷入局部最优的缺点,引入基于凸透镜成像的反向学习策略对当前最优个体进行变换,生成一系列与原个体不同的、具有潜在更好解的新个体,帮助算法摆脱局部最优困境。对比实验结果表明,模拟退火算法、张氏标定法、麻雀搜索算法、粒子群优化算法、狼群捕食仿生算法以及本文提出的算法(CLI-WPP)的平均重投影误差分别为0.42986500、0.28847656、0.23543161、0.219342495、0.10637477和0.06615037。结果表明,与现有的常用优化算法相比,基于CLI-WPP的优化方法显著提高了标定精度、稳定性和鲁棒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/2286b4d25f36/sensors-24-05926-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/747615257530/sensors-24-05926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/34dc568117e7/sensors-24-05926-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/97b4d110ebd9/sensors-24-05926-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/59284018526b/sensors-24-05926-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/6bc4a06ca0ad/sensors-24-05926-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/e340d62c98e2/sensors-24-05926-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/f6d2c84f264a/sensors-24-05926-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/134f81583b09/sensors-24-05926-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/d56259b52156/sensors-24-05926-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/e4fee2e88860/sensors-24-05926-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/ea4a688d12e6/sensors-24-05926-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/075cb9422ff7/sensors-24-05926-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/cde9bc23df98/sensors-24-05926-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/24dca0a3402b/sensors-24-05926-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/842f545133d1/sensors-24-05926-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/71c3a7cdd9cf/sensors-24-05926-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/6aeb7c87caf1/sensors-24-05926-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/2286b4d25f36/sensors-24-05926-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/747615257530/sensors-24-05926-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/34dc568117e7/sensors-24-05926-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/97b4d110ebd9/sensors-24-05926-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/59284018526b/sensors-24-05926-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/6bc4a06ca0ad/sensors-24-05926-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/e340d62c98e2/sensors-24-05926-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/f6d2c84f264a/sensors-24-05926-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/134f81583b09/sensors-24-05926-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/d56259b52156/sensors-24-05926-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/e4fee2e88860/sensors-24-05926-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/ea4a688d12e6/sensors-24-05926-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/075cb9422ff7/sensors-24-05926-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/cde9bc23df98/sensors-24-05926-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/24dca0a3402b/sensors-24-05926-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/842f545133d1/sensors-24-05926-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/71c3a7cdd9cf/sensors-24-05926-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/6aeb7c87caf1/sensors-24-05926-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f195/11435693/2286b4d25f36/sensors-24-05926-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the Optimization Method of Visual Sensor Calibration Combining Convex Lens Imaging with the Bionic Algorithm of Wolf Pack Predation.基于凸透镜成像与狼群捕食仿生算法相结合的视觉传感器标定优化方法研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 12;24(18):5926. doi: 10.3390/s24185926.
2
Calibration of camera internal parameters based on grey wolf optimization improved by levy flight and mutation.基于改进的莱维飞行和变异灰狼优化的相机内部参数标定。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11622-w.
3
An Adaptive Shrinking Grid Search Chaotic Wolf Optimization Algorithm Using Standard Deviation Updating Amount.基于标准差更新幅度的自适应收缩网格搜索混沌狼群优化算法
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020 May 18;2020:7986982. doi: 10.1155/2020/7986982. eCollection 2020.
4
Camera calibration method using synthetic speckle pattern with an improved gray wolf optimizer algorithm.使用具有改进灰狼优化算法的合成散斑图案的相机校准方法。
Appl Opt. 2021 Dec 1;60(34):10477-10489. doi: 10.1364/AO.444593.
5
Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm based on Cauchy-Gaussian mutation and improved search strategy.基于柯西-高斯变异和改进搜索策略的灰狼优化算法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):18961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23713-9.
6
A Novel Coverage Optimization Strategy Based on Grey Wolf Algorithm Optimized by Simulated Annealing for Wireless Sensor Networks.一种基于模拟退火优化灰狼算法的无线传感器网络覆盖优化新策略
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Mar 16;2021:6688408. doi: 10.1155/2021/6688408. eCollection 2021.
7
An Adaptive, Discrete Space Oriented Wolf Pack Optimization Algorithm for a Movable Wireless Sensor Network.一种自适应的、离散空间导向的狼群优化算法在可移动无线传感器网络中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 6;19(19):4320. doi: 10.3390/s19194320.
8
An Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer Based on Differential Evolution and Elimination Mechanism.基于差分进化和淘汰机制的改进灰狼优化算法。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 9;9(1):7181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43546-3.
9
An improved gray wolf optimization algorithm solving to functional optimization and engineering design problems.一种用于解决函数优化和工程设计问题的改进灰狼优化算法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 20;14(1):14190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64526-2.
10
An improved Wolf pack algorithm for optimization problems: Design and evaluation.一种用于优化问题的改进狼群算法:设计与评估
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0254239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254239. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Heuristically enhanced multi-head attention based recurrent neural network for denial of wallet attacks detection on serverless computing environment.基于启发式增强多头注意力的循环神经网络用于无服务器计算环境下钱包拒绝攻击检测
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87636-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing Camera Calibration for Traffic Surveillance with an Integrated Approach of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization.基于遗传算法和粒子群优化的集成方法增强交通监控中的相机校准
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;24(5):1456. doi: 10.3390/s24051456.