Suppr超能文献

评估基于16S的宏基因组二代测序作为不同类型培养阴性感染诊断工具的效能

Evaluation of 16S-Based Metagenomic NGS as Diagnostic Tool in Different Types of Culture-Negative Infections.

作者信息

Rimoldi Sara Giordana, Tamoni Alessandro, Rizzo Alberto, Longobardi Concetta, Pagani Cristina, Salari Federica, Matinato Caterina, Vismara Chiara, Gagliardi Gloria, Cutrera Miriam, Gismondo Maria Rita

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Virology and Bioemergencies, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Luigi Sacco Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy.

Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Pathogens. 2024 Aug 30;13(9):743. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13090743.

Abstract

Bacterial infections pose significant global health challenges, often underestimated due to difficulties in accurate diagnosis, especially when culture-based diagnostics fail. This study assesses the effectiveness of 16S-based metagenomic next generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying pathogens in culture-negative clinical samples across various medical settings. Overall, 48% of samples were collected from orthopedics, 15% from neurosurgery, and 12% in cardiac surgery, among others. The detection rate of monomicrobial infections was 68.6%, and 5.7% for polymicrobial infections. In addition, NGS detected bacteria in all samples from the lungs, head and neck, and eye specimens. (11%, 12/105) was the most frequent microorganism, followed by (10.4%, 11/105), and (9.5%, 10/105). In conclusion, 16S-targeted metagenomic sequencing enhances pathogen detection capabilities, particularly in instances where traditional cultures fail. By the combination of NGS and bacterial cultures, microbiologists might provide a more accurate diagnosis, guiding more effective treatments and potentially reducing healthcare costs associated with empirical treatments.

摘要

细菌感染给全球健康带来了重大挑战,由于准确诊断存在困难,尤其是基于培养的诊断方法失败时,这些挑战常常被低估。本研究评估了基于16S的宏基因组下一代测序(NGS)在各种医疗环境中对培养阴性临床样本中病原体的识别效果。总体而言,48%的样本来自骨科,15%来自神经外科,12%来自心脏外科等。单一微生物感染的检出率为68.6%,多重微生物感染的检出率为5.7%。此外,NGS在所有来自肺部、头颈部和眼部标本的样本中均检测到了细菌。(11%,12/105)是最常见的微生物,其次是(10.4%,11/105)和(9.5%,10/105)。总之,靶向16S的宏基因组测序增强了病原体检测能力,尤其是在传统培养方法失败的情况下。通过将NGS与细菌培养相结合,微生物学家可能会提供更准确的诊断,指导更有效的治疗,并有可能降低与经验性治疗相关的医疗成本。

相似文献

4
Molecular diagnosis of polymicrobial brain abscesses with 16S-rDNA-based next-generation sequencing.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.028. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Microbiological diagnosis of pleural infections: a comparative evaluation of a novel syndromic real-time PCR panel.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0351023. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03510-23. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Illumina and Nanopore sequencing in culture-negative samples from suspected lower respiratory tract infection patients.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Apr 4;14:1230650. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1230650. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of metagenomic next-generation sequencing and blood culture for diagnosis of bloodstream infections.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jan 24;14:1338861. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1338861. eCollection 2024.
5
A case report of diagnosis and dynamic monitoring of meningitis with NGS.
Open Life Sci. 2023 Nov 8;18(1):20220738. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0738. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of the contribution of shotgun metagenomics in the microbiological diagnosis of liver abscesses.
J Infect. 2023 Nov;87(5):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
7
16S rRNA Gene PCR/Sequencing of Heart Valves for Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis in Routine Clinical Practice.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Aug 23;61(8):e0034123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00341-23. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
Cultures in periprosthetic joint infections, the imperfect gold standard?
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Apr 25;8(4):175-179. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0115.
9
Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 11;11(12):1798. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121798.
10
Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
Lancet. 2022 Dec 17;400(10369):2221-2248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验