Suppr超能文献

使用传统微生物培养和16S宏基因组学从临床标本中检测细菌病原体:一项比较研究。

Detection of bacterial pathogens from clinical specimens using conventional microbial culture and 16S metagenomics: a comparative study.

作者信息

Abayasekara Lalanika M, Perera Jennifer, Chandrasekharan Vishvanath, Gnanam Vaz S, Udunuwara Nisala A, Liyanage Dileepa S, Bulathsinhala Nuwani E, Adikary Subhashanie, Aluthmuhandiram Janith V S, Thanaseelan Chrishanthi S, Tharmakulasingam D Portia, Karunakaran Tharaga, Ilango Janahan

机构信息

Credence Genomics Pvt. Ltd, 12 - 3/2, Sunethradevi Road, Kohuwala, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.

Dean and Chair Professor of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, P.O. box 271, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2727-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infectious disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, and diagnosis of polymicrobial and fungal infections is increasingly challenging in the clinical setting. Conventionally, molecular detection is still the best method of species identification in clinical samples. However, the limitations of Sanger sequencing make diagnosis of polymicrobial infections one of the biggest hurdles in treatment. The development of massively parallel sequencing or next generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the field of metagenomics, with wide application of the technology in identification of microbial communities in environmental sources, human gut and others. However, to date there has been no commercial application of this technology in infectious disease diagnostic settings.

METHODS

Credence Genomics Rapid Infection Detection™ test, is a molecular based diagnostic test that uses next generation sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS1 gene region to provide accurate identification of species within a clinical sample. Here we present a study comparing 16S and ITS1 metagenomic identification against conventional culture for clinical samples. Using culture results as gold standard, a comparison was conducted using patient specimens from a clinical microbiology lab.

RESULTS

Metagenomics based results show a 91.8% concordance rate for culture positive specimens and 52.8% concordance rate with culture negative samples. 10.3% of specimens were also positive for fungal species which was not investigated by culture. Specificity and sensitivity for metagenomics analysis is 91.8 and 52.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

16S based metagenomic identification of bacterial species within a clinical specimen is on par with conventional culture based techniques and when coupled with clinical information can lead to an accurate diagnostic tool for infectious disease diagnosis.

摘要

背景

传染病是全球主要死因,在临床环境中对多种微生物和真菌感染进行诊断的挑战日益增加。传统上,分子检测仍是临床样本中物种鉴定的最佳方法。然而,桑格测序的局限性使得对多种微生物感染的诊断成为治疗中的最大障碍之一。大规模平行测序或下一代测序(NGS)的发展彻底改变了宏基因组学领域,该技术在环境样本、人类肠道等微生物群落鉴定中得到广泛应用。然而,迄今为止,该技术在传染病诊断领域尚无商业应用。

方法

Credence Genomics快速感染检测™测试是一种基于分子的诊断测试,它利用细菌16S rRNA基因和真菌ITS1基因区域的下一代测序来准确鉴定临床样本中的物种。在此,我们展示一项针对临床样本,将16S和ITS1宏基因组鉴定与传统培养方法进行比较的研究。以培养结果作为金标准,使用临床微生物实验室的患者标本进行比较。

结果

基于宏基因组学的结果显示,培养阳性标本的一致性率为91.8%,与培养阴性样本的一致性率为52.8%。10.3%的标本还检测出真菌阳性,而培养未对此进行研究。宏基因组学分析的特异性和敏感性分别为91.8%和52.7%。

结论

基于16S的临床标本中细菌物种的宏基因组鉴定与传统培养技术相当,结合临床信息可形成一种准确的传染病诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e12/5606128/4d9d4e23324d/12879_2017_2727_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验