Nevin Mary, Payne Sheila, Smith Valerie
School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Palliat Med. 2024 Dec;38(10):1169-1183. doi: 10.1177/02692163241283540. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Healthcare providers working in hospitals have significant exposure to patients with palliative care needs. For many patients, these needs often reflect non-specialist rather than specialist palliative care needs. Embedding a palliative care approach in acute hospital-based care however is challenging.
To identify core indicators for the integration of a palliative care approach in hospitals.
A Delphi technique used three sequential online survey rounds. Preliminary indicators were identified in a concept analysis of a palliative care approach, and a systematic review of hospital-based healthcare providers' views of a palliative care approach.
An international expert panel of three key stakeholder groups (clinicians, researchers, patients/family members) participated in each Delphi round.
The Delphi participants were recruited from 12 countries; 97 individuals responded to round 1, 78 to round 2 and 72 to round 3 (74% overall response rate). Consensus was achieved (defined a priori as >70%) on 32 core indicators of a hospital-based palliative care approach, with five structural indicators (relating to infrastructure and governance), 21 organisational indicators (relating to clinical care processes) and six staff indicators (relating to training and support for healthcare providers).
This study offers multi-level guidance for clinical practice, policy and research related to integration of a palliative care approach in hospitals, based on evidence and international consensus from major stakeholder groups. These core indicators provide a means to assess, review and communicate the core elements of a palliative care approach in hospitals.
在医院工作的医疗服务提供者会大量接触到有姑息治疗需求的患者。对许多患者而言,这些需求往往反映的是非专科而非专科姑息治疗需求。然而,将姑息治疗方法融入急性医院护理具有挑战性。
确定在医院中整合姑息治疗方法的核心指标。
采用德尔菲技术进行三轮连续的在线调查。在对姑息治疗方法的概念分析以及对医院医疗服务提供者对姑息治疗方法看法的系统评价中确定了初步指标。
三个关键利益相关者群体(临床医生、研究人员、患者/家庭成员)的国际专家小组参与了每一轮德尔菲调查。
德尔菲参与者来自12个国家;第一轮有97人回复,第二轮有78人回复,第三轮有72人回复(总体回复率为74%)。就基于医院的姑息治疗方法的32项核心指标达成了共识(事先定义为>70%),其中包括5项结构指标(与基础设施和治理有关)、21项组织指标(与临床护理流程有关)和6项人员指标(与医疗服务提供者的培训和支持有关)。
本研究基于主要利益相关者群体的证据和国际共识,为与在医院中整合姑息治疗方法相关的临床实践、政策和研究提供了多层次指导。这些核心指标提供了一种评估、审查和交流医院姑息治疗方法核心要素的手段。