• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“支持强者”还是“帮助弱者”?:社会比较和社会距离对独裁者博弈中合作行为的影响

"Support the strong" or "Help the weak?": The effects of social comparison and social distance on cooperative behavior in the dictator game.

作者信息

Sun Qian, Li Qinglei, Qian Jiamin, Luo Shasha, Liu Yongfang

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

College of Education Science, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):103-117. doi: 10.1002/pchj.802. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1002/pchj.802
PMID:39340308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11787882/
Abstract

Within an object-interdependent context, we conducted three experiments to investigate the influence of social comparisons on cooperative behavior, as well as to assess the mediating and moderating effects of related variables. In Experiment 1 (n = 207), we examined whether social comparisons impact cooperative behavior toward a comparator in a dictator game task. Here, we specifically focused on the mediating effects of evaluation of others' competence, along with three other potential mediators: self-competence evaluation, positive emotions, and negative emotions. Following the insights gained from Experiment 1, we proceeded to Experiments 2 (n = 279) and 3 (n = 298) to further explore whether social distance moderates the mediating effect of evaluation of others' competence. The results of all three experiments consistently indicated that upward (vs. non-) comparison facilitated cooperative behavior, whereas downward (vs. non-) comparison hindered it. Furthermore, our findings revealed that evaluation of others' competence served as a mediator between social comparison and cooperative behavior when the comparator (i.e., the cooperative partner) was perceived as being at a far-distance, whereas the mediating effect of evaluation of others' competence disappeared when social distance was close. These results reveal the pivotal role of evaluating others' competence and social distance in social interactions from the perspective of social comparison, which provides insights into how to promote cooperative behavior.

摘要

在一个对象相互依赖的情境中,我们进行了三项实验,以研究社会比较对合作行为的影响,并评估相关变量的中介和调节作用。在实验1(n = 207)中,我们考察了在独裁者博弈任务中社会比较是否会影响对比较对象的合作行为。在这里,我们特别关注对他人能力评价的中介作用,以及其他三个潜在的中介变量:自我能力评价、积极情绪和消极情绪。根据实验1获得的见解,我们接着进行了实验2(n = 279)和实验3(n = 298),以进一步探究社会距离是否会调节对他人能力评价的中介作用。所有三项实验的结果一致表明,向上(而非不)比较促进了合作行为,而向下(而非不)比较则阻碍了合作行为。此外,我们的研究结果显示,当比较对象(即合作伙伴)被视为处于远距离时,对他人能力的评价在社会比较和合作行为之间起到了中介作用,而当社会距离较近时,对他人能力评价的中介作用则消失了。这些结果从社会比较的角度揭示了对他人能力评价和社会距离在社会互动中的关键作用,为如何促进合作行为提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/bd5f2d4dd5a8/PCHJ-14-103-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/1cb3a2dbc439/PCHJ-14-103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/39375b9a58dd/PCHJ-14-103-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/cebc5c6715ef/PCHJ-14-103-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/3042d18d5b7b/PCHJ-14-103-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/eaecae2cf898/PCHJ-14-103-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/bd5f2d4dd5a8/PCHJ-14-103-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/1cb3a2dbc439/PCHJ-14-103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/39375b9a58dd/PCHJ-14-103-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/cebc5c6715ef/PCHJ-14-103-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/3042d18d5b7b/PCHJ-14-103-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/eaecae2cf898/PCHJ-14-103-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027d/11787882/bd5f2d4dd5a8/PCHJ-14-103-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
"Support the strong" or "Help the weak?": The effects of social comparison and social distance on cooperative behavior in the dictator game.“支持强者”还是“帮助弱者”?:社会比较和社会距离对独裁者博弈中合作行为的影响
Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):103-117. doi: 10.1002/pchj.802. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
[Effects of environmental change and others' behavior on cooperative behavior and solution preference in social dilemma].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Dec;72(5):369-77. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.369.
3
Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.独裁者博弈和最后通牒博弈中给出的比例会随着金额和社会距离的增加而降低。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
How individuals react emotionally to others' (mis)fortunes: A social comparison framework.个体如何对他人的(不)幸进行情绪反应:一个社会比较框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;123(1):55-83. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000299. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
The interplay between sharing behavior and beliefs about others in children during dictator games.独裁者游戏中儿童分享行为与对他人看法之间的相互作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Humans expect generosity.人类期望慷慨大方。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 14;7:42446. doi: 10.1038/srep42446.
7
The effects of social exclusion on distributive fairness judgements and cooperative behaviour.社会排斥对分配公平判断和合作行为的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12810. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12810. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
8
Distanced self-talk increases rational self-interest.疏离的自言自语会增加理性的自利。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04010-3.
9
[Accuracy of judgment about others' cooperative behavior: effects of attractiveness and facial expressiveness].[对他人合作行为判断的准确性:吸引力和面部表情的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2010 Jun;81(2):149-57. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.81.149.
10
The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.延迟和社会距离对独裁者和最后通牒游戏的影响。
Behav Processes. 2021 Dec;193:104513. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104513. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
How individuals react emotionally to others' (mis)fortunes: A social comparison framework.个体如何对他人的(不)幸进行情绪反应:一个社会比较框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;123(1):55-83. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000299. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.延迟和社会距离对独裁者和最后通牒游戏的影响。
Behav Processes. 2021 Dec;193:104513. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104513. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
3
Biased Benevolence: The Perceived Morality of Effective Altruism Across Social Distance.
有偏向的仁爱:社会距离对有效利他主义道德认知的影响
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Mar;48(3):426-444. doi: 10.1177/01461672211002773. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
4
Social distance modulates outcome processing when comparing abilities with others.社会距离会调节将自身能力与他人进行比较时的结果加工。
Psychophysiology. 2021 May;58(5):e13798. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13798. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
A motivational framework of social comparison.社会比较的动机框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jun;120(6):1415-1430. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000204. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Experimental Games and Social Decision Making.实验游戏与社会决策
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:415-438. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-081420-110718. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure.刻板印象内容:温暖与能力持久不变。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;27(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0963721417738825. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Propagation of Economic Inequality Through Reciprocity and Reputation.互惠和声誉导致经济不平等的传播。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):604-613. doi: 10.1177/0956797617741720. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on.社会比较理论的 60 多年元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;144(2):177-197. doi: 10.1037/bul0000127. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Social rank and social cooperation: Impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making.社会等级与社会合作:社会比较过程对合作决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 7;12(4):e0175472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175472. eCollection 2017.