Suppr超能文献

在倾向于夹闭治疗的机构中接受血管内治疗的大脑中动脉动脉瘤的特征。

Characteristics of middle cerebral artery aneurysms treated endovascularly in a clip-favored institution.

作者信息

Kiyofuji Satoshi, Koizumi Satoshi, Kin Taichi, Miyawaki Satoru, Hongo Hiroki, Umekawa Motoyuki, Saito Nobuhito

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 28:15910199241286242. doi: 10.1177/15910199241286242.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergence of flow disruptors has brought a dynamic transition in the selection of treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, and the number of MCA aneurysms clipped is acceleratingly decreasing. Still, retreatment after endovascular treatment is still a dilemma, which may necessitate surgical clipping. It is all the more important to elucidate characteristics of MCA aneurysms that make clipping unfavorable. Thus, the practical characteristics of MCA aneurysms treated endovascularly in a clip-favored institution before the usage of flow disruption devices were investigated.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center observational study. The clinical and imaging characteristics of treated MCA aneurysms from January 2012 to May 2022 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 83 aneurysms were included; 70 aneurysms (84%) were clipped, and 13 (16%) were treated endovascularly. Eighteen aneurysms (22%) were ruptured (clipping, 12; endovascular, 6). The reasons for an endovascular treatment were as follows: distal (3); subacutely ruptured with burdens of spasm (2); multiple aneurysms (6: another clipped in 3, coiled in 1, and conservatively managed in 2); no access to the operating room due to COVID-19 (1); and retreatment after coiling (1). Endovascular group aneurysms were smaller (maximum diameter 5.2 vs 7.3 mm,  < 0.01, as well as dome, neck, and height) without differences in the dome/neck and aspect (height/neck) ratios. In a subgroup analysis of 78 MCA bifurcation aneurysms, the endovascular group was still smaller (dome 4.4 vs 5.8 mm,  = 0.025; neck 2.8 vs 3.9,  = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

In a limited series from a clip-favored institution before the flow disruption era, factors guided to endovascular treatments on MCA aneurysms were rather anatomical and clinical factors such as distal location, subacutely ruptured, multiple, or retreatment after coiling, than morphological factors such as dome/neck and aspect ratios albeit smaller size.

摘要

背景

血流干扰装置的出现给大脑中动脉(MCA)动脉瘤的治疗选择带来了动态转变,接受夹闭治疗的MCA动脉瘤数量正在加速减少。尽管如此,血管内治疗后的再次治疗仍然是一个难题,可能需要进行手术夹闭。阐明导致夹闭治疗不利的MCA动脉瘤特征显得尤为重要。因此,本研究调查了在血流干扰装置使用之前,在倾向于夹闭治疗的机构中接受血管内治疗的MCA动脉瘤的实际特征。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。分析了2012年1月至2022年5月期间接受治疗的MCA动脉瘤的临床和影像特征。

结果

共纳入83个动脉瘤;70个动脉瘤(84%)接受了夹闭治疗,13个(16%)接受了血管内治疗。18个动脉瘤(22%)破裂(夹闭治疗12个;血管内治疗6个)。血管内治疗的原因如下:动脉瘤位于远端(3个);亚急性破裂并伴有痉挛(2个);多发性动脉瘤(6个:3个另一个接受了夹闭治疗,1个接受了弹簧圈栓塞治疗,2个采取保守治疗);因新冠疫情无法进入手术室(1个);弹簧圈栓塞治疗后再次治疗(1个)。血管内治疗组的动脉瘤较小(最大直径5.2 vs 7.3 mm,<0.01,包括瘤顶、瘤颈和高度),瘤顶/瘤颈比和外观(高度/瘤颈)比无差异。在78个MCA分叉部动脉瘤的亚组分析中,血管内治疗组的动脉瘤仍然较小(瘤顶4.4 vs 5.8 mm,=0.025;瘤颈2.8 vs 3.9,=0.03)。

结论

在血流干扰时代之前,来自倾向于夹闭治疗机构的有限系列研究中,导致MCA动脉瘤接受血管内治疗的因素更多是解剖和临床因素,如远端位置、亚急性破裂、多发性或弹簧圈栓塞治疗后再次治疗,而非瘤顶/瘤颈比和外观比等形态学因素,尽管动脉瘤尺寸较小。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验