Suppr超能文献

超声引导下选择性颈椎神经根脉冲射频治疗慢性颈神经根痛的疗效评价。

Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic cervical radicular pain.

机构信息

Department of Algology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Varlık Mahallesi, Halil Sezai Erkut Caddesi Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Ultrasound. 2024 Dec;27(4):847-855. doi: 10.1007/s40477-024-00950-4. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Management of cervical radicular pain is complex and may be resistant to conservative treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency (US-SCNR PRF) treatment in patients with radicular neck pain due to cervical disc herniation who did not respond to conservative treatment. The secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of the treatment in terms of functionality, neuropathic pain, and treatment-related adverse events.

METHODS

This study included 62 patients with chronic cervical radicular pain who underwent US-SCNR PRF treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The Neck Disability Index and Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions were used to assess functionality and neuropathic pain before and 6 months after treatment. Significant pain relief was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the pain score compared with the pre-treatment score.

RESULTS

Cervical radicular pain was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months after pulsed radiofrequency compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.001). Successful pain relief was achieved in 59.6% of the patients at 6 month. However, there was no significant difference between the mean pain scores in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. In addition, the functionality and neuropathic pain scores were significantly reduced at 6 month.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that US-SCNR PRF treatment is effective for cervical radicular pain, functionality, and neuropathic pain for at least six months in the majority of patients with refractory cervical radicular pain, and is considered a safer and preferable treatment modality due to real-time visualization of the cervical nerve roots and adjacent neurovascular structures and no radiation exposure.

摘要

目的

颈椎神经根痛的治疗较为复杂,且可能对保守治疗有抵抗性。本研究的主要目的是评估超声引导下选择性颈椎神经根脉冲射频(US-SCNR PRF)治疗对保守治疗无效的颈椎间盘突出症所致神经根性颈痛患者的疗效。次要目的是确定该治疗在功能、神经性疼痛和与治疗相关的不良事件方面的疗效。

方法

本研究纳入了 62 例慢性颈椎神经根痛患者,他们接受了 US-SCNR PRF 治疗。在治疗前以及治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月时,使用数字评分量表评估疼痛强度。在治疗前和治疗后 6 个月时,使用颈部残疾指数和 4 个问题神经性疼痛量表评估功能和神经性疼痛。显著疼痛缓解定义为与治疗前评分相比,疼痛评分降低≥50%。

结果

与治疗前相比,脉冲射频治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月时颈椎神经根痛显著减轻(P<0.001)。在 6 个月时,有 59.6%的患者获得了成功的疼痛缓解。然而,1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月的平均疼痛评分之间没有显著差异。此外,在 6 个月时,功能和神经性疼痛评分显著降低。

结论

这些结果表明,在大多数难治性颈椎神经根痛患者中,US-SCNR PRF 治疗对颈椎神经根痛、功能和神经性疼痛至少可有效 6 个月,并且由于可以实时可视化颈椎神经根和相邻的神经血管结构,且无辐射暴露,因此被认为是一种更安全和更可取的治疗方式。

相似文献

2
Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults.针刺疗法治疗成人神经性疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 2;12(12):CD012057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012057.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
2. Cervical radicular pain.2. 颈神经根痛。
Pain Pract. 2023 Sep;23(7):800-817. doi: 10.1111/papr.13252. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
5
Clinimetrics: Neck Disability Index.临床测量学:颈部功能障碍指数
J Physiother. 2021 Apr;67(2):144. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.001. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验