Division of Microbiology, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 210-9501, Japan.
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Hoshi University, 2-4-41 Ebara, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8501, Japan.
J Food Prot. 2024 Nov;87(11):100366. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100366. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Effective methods for decontamination of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on beef were evaluated by 48 mL spraying, 100 mL, and 500 mL flushing with ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite, and sodium hypochlorite in this study. The flushing with 500 mL of 1,000 ppm peracetic acid was most effective, reducing pathogens by 2.8 log CFU/cm, followed by 1,200 ppm acidified sodium chlorite. The spraying with 1,000 ppm peracetic acid reduced pathogens by 1.6 log CFU/cm. The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite, and 50, 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly reduced the STEC population compared with those treated with distilled water (p < 0.05), reducing pathogens by 2.1, 2.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.1 and 2.4 log CFU/cm, respectively. Additionally, the flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite significantly changed the color of beef samples (p < 0.05), whereas 100-500 ppm peracetic acid did not significantly change the color (p > 0.05). The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite and 200 and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly changed the odor of beef samples compared with those treated with distilled water (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the reduction of STEC population between peracetic acid treatment at 25 °C and 55 °C, with or without washing with sterilized distilled water after decontamination. Washing with distilled water after flushing with peracetic acid tended to reduce the odor of the samples. These results suggest that treatment with 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid, followed by washing with distilled water, might reduce the STEC population without retaining the odor of the sanitizer.
本研究评估了用 48mL 喷雾、100mL 和 500mL 冲洗的方法,用乙醇、过氧化氢、过氧乙酸、酸化亚氯酸钠和次氯酸钠对牛肉中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)进行消毒的有效方法。用 500mL1000ppm 过氧乙酸冲洗效果最佳,可减少 2.8 个对数 CFU/cm 的病原体,其次是用 1200ppm 酸化亚氯酸钠冲洗。用 1000ppm 过氧乙酸喷雾可减少 1.6 个对数 CFU/cm 的病原体。用 500mL200ppm 和 500ppm 酸化亚氯酸钠,以及 50ppm、100ppm、200ppm 和 500ppm 过氧乙酸冲洗,与用蒸馏水冲洗相比,显著减少了 STEC 数量(p<0.05),减少了 2.1、2.4、1.6、1.8、2.1 和 2.4 个对数 CFU/cm 的病原体。此外,用 500mL200ppm 和 500ppm 酸化亚氯酸钠冲洗显著改变了牛肉样品的颜色(p<0.05),而用 100-500ppm 过氧乙酸冲洗则没有显著改变颜色(p>0.05)。用 500mL200ppm 和 500ppm 酸化亚氯酸钠和 200ppm 和 500ppm 过氧乙酸冲洗与用蒸馏水冲洗相比,显著改变了牛肉样品的气味(p<0.05)。在消毒后用无菌蒸馏水洗涤或不洗涤的情况下,25°C 和 55°C 用过氧乙酸处理对 STEC 种群的减少没有差异。在用过氧乙酸冲洗后用蒸馏水洗涤会降低样品的气味。这些结果表明,用 100ppm、200ppm 和 500ppm 过氧乙酸处理,然后用蒸馏水冲洗,可能会在不保留消毒剂气味的情况下减少 STEC 种群。