State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
J Dent. 2024 Nov;150:105369. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105369. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
To evaluate the effects of different stamp materials and restoration depths on the accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp technique.
Eighty standard resin teeth were divided into four groups based on different stamp materials: flowable composite resin (FR), vinyl polydimethyl siloxane (VPS) for bite registration (VB), VPS for impression (VI) and transparent VPS (TV). Each material group was further divided into two subgroups based on restoration depth (1 and 2 mm; n = 10). Standardized Class I cavities were prepared and restored with the corresponding stamps. Pre- and post-treatment scans of each tooth were fitted using Geomagic Control X software, generating deviation distribution maps of the occlusal surface. The accuracy indicators, including mean height variation (MHV), root mean square (RMS), and proportions of height variation with different ranges (PHV), were recorded to evaluate the accuracy of restorations. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05).
The type of stamp material significantly affected all accuracy indicators, while restoration depth did not show a significant effect on any of the indicators. MHV values ranged from 29.70 ± 5.88 μm to 63.52 ± 9.58 μm, and RMS values ranged from 62.78 ± 8.76 μm to 101.79 ± 13.17 μm, displaying a trend of FR<VB<VI<TV. The FR groups had the highest PHV values (72.24 ± 3.40 % for 1 mm, 71.47 ± 8.54 % for 2 mm) and the lowest PHV values (0.70 ± 0.50 % for 1 mm, 0.94 ± 0.47 % for 2 mm). In contrast, the TV groups exhibited the lowest PHV values (59.69 ± 10.23 % for 1 mm, 59.67 ± 5.70 % for 2 mm), while the VI groups showed the highest PHV values (7.34 ± 1.58 % for 1 mm, 8.20 ± 3.16 % for 2 mm).
The accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp made of flowable composite resin was higher than that of all tested VPS materials, thereby reducing the need for occlusal adjustment and improving clinical efficiency. Besides, restoration depth had no significant impact on the accuracy of stamp technique, regardless of the stamp material used.
The accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp technique with different stamp materials varies. The flowable composite resin stamp exhibits higher accuracy compared with VPS stamps, reducing the need for occlusal adjustments.
评估不同印模材料和修复深度对印模技术直接复合树脂修复体准确性的影响。
根据不同的印模材料,将 80 颗标准树脂牙分为四组:可流动复合树脂(FR)、用于咬合记录的乙烯基聚二甲基硅氧烷(VPS)(VB)、用于印模的 VPS(VI)和透明 VPS(TV)。每个材料组进一步根据修复深度(1 和 2 毫米;n = 10)分为两个亚组。用相应的印模制备和修复标准化的 I 类腔。使用 Geomagic Control X 软件拟合每个牙齿的预处理和后处理扫描,生成咬合面偏差分布图。记录准确性指标,包括平均高度变化(MHV)、均方根(RMS)和不同范围高度变化的比例(PHV),以评估修复体的准确性。使用方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析(α=0.05)。
印模材料的类型显著影响所有准确性指标,而修复深度对任何指标均无显著影响。MHV 值范围为 29.70 ± 5.88 μm 至 63.52 ± 9.58 μm,RMS 值范围为 62.78 ± 8.76 μm 至 101.79 ± 13.17 μm,呈 FR<VB<VI<TV 的趋势。FR 组的 PHV 值最高(1 毫米时为 72.24 ± 3.40%,2 毫米时为 71.47 ± 8.54%),PHV 值最低(1 毫米时为 0.70 ± 0.50%,2 毫米时为 0.94 ± 0.47%)。相比之下,TV 组的 PHV 值最低(1 毫米时为 59.69 ± 10.23%,2 毫米时为 59.67 ± 5.70%),而 VI 组的 PHV 值最高(1 毫米时为 7.34 ± 1.58%,2 毫米时为 8.20 ± 3.16%)。
使用可流动复合树脂制成的印模进行直接复合树脂修复的准确性高于所有测试的 VPS 材料,从而减少了咬合调整的需要,提高了临床效率。此外,无论使用何种印模材料,修复深度对印模技术的准确性均无显著影响。
不同印模材料的印模技术直接复合树脂修复体的准确性不同。与 VPS 印模相比,可流动复合树脂印模具有更高的准确性,减少了咬合调整的需要。