State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, #237 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
Department of Prosthodontics, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, #237 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
J Dent. 2024 Oct;149:105277. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105277. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
To evaluate the clinical performance of direct restorations for pit-and-fissure caries in molars using stamp combined with single-shade composite resin (S/SCR) technique, and assess the effect of the number of stamp pressing on the trueness of S/SCR technique.
Twenty molars of fifteen patients with pit-and-fissure caries but with an intact or micro-cavitated occlusal morphology were restored using S/SCR technique and were randomly divided into single pressing group (n = 10) and double pressing group (n = 10). Intraoral scans were obtained before treatment (scan 1), after filling (scan 2) and after polishing (scan 3). Deviation distribution maps of pairwise fitting were created including comparison 1 (scan1/scan 2), comparison 2 (scan1/scan 3), and comparison 3 (scan2/scan 3) using Geomagic Control X software. Root mean square (RMS) values were calculated to evaluate the trueness of restorations. Clinical performances including esthetic, functional, and biological properties of all restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria after a 12-month follow-up. Analysis of variance, independent-samples T test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05).
RMS values for comparison 1, comparison 2, and comparison 3 were 0.1243 ± 0.0151, 0.0966 ± 0.0136, and 0.0605 ± 0.0137 mm in single pressing group, while 0.0831 ± 0.0140, 0.0741 ± 0.0107, and 0.0475 ± 0.0099 mm in double pressing group, respectively. RMS value of single pressing group was higher than that of double pressing group in the same comparison (p ≤ 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). For all properties, all restorations scored within 3, with over 80% scoring 1.
S/SCR technique presents satisfying clinical performances for pit-and-fissure caries in molars after a 12-month follow-up. Besides, double pressing can improve the trueness of restorations compared to single pressing.
S/SCR technique is efficient in direct composite resin restoration for pit-and-fissure caries, with satisfying esthetic, functional and biological properties after a 12-month follow-up. Significantly, double pressing improves the trueness of S/SCR technique, reducing the need for occlusion adjustment.
评估使用印模联合单色调复合树脂(S/SCR)技术对磨牙窝沟龋进行直接修复的临床效果,并评估印模按压次数对 S/SCR 技术准确性的影响。
将 15 名患者的 20 颗窝沟龋但具有完整或微腔形态的磨牙采用 S/SCR 技术进行修复,并随机分为单次按压组(n=10)和双次按压组(n=10)。治疗前(扫描 1)、填充后(扫描 2)和抛光后(扫描 3)进行口内扫描。使用 Geomagic Control X 软件创建包括比较 1(scan1/scan 2)、比较 2(scan1/scan 3)和比较 3(scan2/scan 3)在内的配对拟合偏差分布图。计算均方根(RMS)值以评估修复体的准确性。所有修复体在 12 个月随访后根据 FDI 标准评估美学、功能和生物学性能。采用方差分析、独立样本 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。
单次按压组的比较 1、比较 2 和比较 3 的 RMS 值分别为 0.1243±0.0151、0.0966±0.0136 和 0.0605±0.0137mm,而双次按压组的 RMS 值分别为 0.0831±0.0140、0.0741±0.0107 和 0.0475±0.0099mm。同一比较中,单次按压组的 RMS 值高于双次按压组(p≤0.001)。两组在美学、功能和生物学性能方面无统计学差异(p>0.05)。所有属性的所有修复体评分均在 3 以内,超过 80%的修复体评分为 1。
S/SCR 技术在 12 个月随访后对磨牙窝沟龋具有满意的临床效果。此外,与单次按压相比,双次按压可以提高修复体的准确性。
S/SCR 技术在磨牙窝沟龋的直接复合树脂修复中效果显著,12 个月随访后具有满意的美学、功能和生物学性能。重要的是,双次按压可提高 S/SCR 技术的准确性,减少对咬合调整的需求。