Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, Bern, CH 3010, Switzerland.
Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, Bern, CH 3010, Switzerland.
J Dent. 2024 Nov;150:105374. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105374. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
This study evaluated whether a relationship exist between tactile sensation, roughness and reflection intensity in active enamel lesions of primary (deciduous) and permanent dentition.
Freshly extracted teeth of the primary (n=29) and permanent (n=60) dentition of patients who underwent serial extractions under general anesthesia due to multiple deep caries lesions showing active lesions (International Caries Detection and Assessment System scores of 2) were selected. The mean linear (Ra), area-related (Sa), volume-related (Vmc) roughness and vertical reflection intensity (VRI) of sound (S) and carious (C) areas were determined by using a 3D-laser-scanning-microscope and a multi-sensor microscope with two different chromatic-confocal optics. Furthermore, two blinded examiners evaluated the roughness by tactile examination using three different explorers (S23H,405CP11, S3C).
Mean differences (95%CI) between S and C for teeth of the primary dentition were: Ra:-1.9(-2.3;-0.4)µm, Sa:-31.8(-1.8;0.0)µm, Vmc:-1.8(-1.6;-0.0)ml/m, VRI:29(20;43) and for teeth of the permanent dentition: Ra:-4.0(-2.5;-1.0)µm, Sa:-4.8(-3.0;-1.1)µm, Vmc:-4.6(-3.4;-0.5)ml/m, VRI:34(19;44) differing significantly between S and C (p<0.05,Wilcoxon test). No significant difference was observed between 1st and 2nd dentition (p>0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test) as well as commercial and experimental optic (p>0.05). The highest positive predictive value (PPV) was achieved by examiner 1 with explorer S3C (1st dentition 67%;2nd dentition 100%;pooled dentition 88%)), while examiner 2 revealed the highest PPV with explorer S23H (89%;86%;88%).
Differences in roughness and reflectance between sound and caries-active enamel surfaces could be evaluated in both primary and permanent dentition. These differences could also be reliably detected using three different explorers with good validity. However, the most predictive explorer seems to differ between examiners.
In both primary (deciduous) and permanent dentition active caries lesions exhibit significantly higher roughness and lower vertical reflection intensity compared with sound enamel. These differences are detectable by blind tactile examination and objective methods such as 3D-laser-scanning or multi-sensor microscopy, highlighting their utility in caries diagnosis in both dentitions.
本研究旨在评估原发性(乳牙)和恒牙活跃性牙釉质病变的触觉、粗糙度和反射强度之间是否存在关系。
选择因多发性深龋病变而在全身麻醉下进行连续拔牙的患者的原发性(n=29)和永久性(n=60)牙齿的新鲜离体牙。使用三维激光扫描显微镜和具有两种不同比色共聚焦光学的多传感器显微镜,确定健康(S)和龋坏(C)区域的平均线性(Ra)、面积相关(Sa)、体积相关(Vmc)粗糙度和垂直反射强度(VRI)。此外,两位盲检员使用三种不同的探测仪(S23H、405CP11、S3C)进行触觉检查来评估粗糙度。
乳牙中 S 和 C 之间的平均差异(95%CI)为:Ra:-1.9(-2.3;-0.4)µm,Sa:-31.8(-1.8;0.0)µm,Vmc:-1.8(-1.6;-0.0)ml/m,VRI:29(20;43),恒牙中 S 和 C 之间的平均差异(95%CI)为:Ra:-4.0(-2.5;-1.0)µm,Sa:-4.8(-3.0;-1.1)µm,Vmc:-4.6(-3.4;-0.5)ml/m,VRI:34(19;44),差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05,Wilcoxon 检验)。第 1 恒磨牙和第 2 恒磨牙(p>0.05,Kruskal-Wallis 检验)以及商业和实验光学(p>0.05)之间未见显著差异。第 1 位检查者使用 S3C 探测仪的阳性预测值(PPV)最高(第 1 恒磨牙 67%;第 2 恒磨牙 100%;总恒磨牙 88%),而第 2 位检查者使用 S23H 探测仪的 PPV 最高(第 1 恒磨牙 89%;第 2 恒磨牙 86%;总恒磨牙 88%)。
原发性(乳牙)和恒牙活跃性龋损的表面粗糙度和反射率差异可在两种牙列中进行评估。这些差异也可以使用三种具有良好有效性的不同探测仪可靠地检测到。然而,最具预测性的探测仪似乎因检查者而异。
原发性(乳牙)和恒牙活跃性龋损的表面粗糙度和反射率明显高于健康牙釉质。这些差异可通过盲法触觉检查和三维激光扫描或多传感器显微镜等客观方法检测到,突出了它们在两种牙列中的龋病诊断中的实用性。