Guo Jiawen, Fan Xiaolei, Yao Yichen, Yun Jiaojiao, Wang Xiaoshuang, Wang Yanlan, Wang Yan
Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):898-907. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
This study aimed to investigate the impact of head circumference on the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) facial scans, focusing on trueness and precision across three mannequin heads of different sizes.
Three 3D-printed mannequin heads with circumferences of 30, 50, and 65 cm were used. Ten facial landmarks were identified to measure seven interlandmark distances and two angles. Direct anthropometric measurement, serving as the reference value, was taken using a digital vernier calliper for linear distance, and angle was calculated using the law of cosines. Each head was scanned six times using two systems: a dual-structured light facial scanner (iTom) and a stereophotogrammetry system (3dMD). Digital measurements were analysed using Meshlab and Blender for distances and angles, respectively. Trueness values were determined by comparing measurements to reference measurements, while precision values were derived from the variability among the six scans. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test due to nonhomogeneous variances, followed by Bonferroni correction for pairwise group comparisons.
For each scanning system, overall deviations in trueness and precision significantly increased with head circumference. Five of the seven distances and one angle showed significant compromises in trueness with larger head circumferences. Most measurements exhibited significant precision decreasing due to head circumference changes, except for N-Pn and Pn-Sn. Additionally, 3dMD displayed higher overall trueness compared to iTom, with five out of seven linear measurements and one angular measurement showing better results.
Head circumference significantly affects both trueness and precision of 3D facial scans for both technologies, suggesting that facial imaging should be used with caution for larger faces. Selecting an appropriate scanning system, such as 3dMD, can help mitigate the negative effects of scanning larger objects.
本研究旨在调查头围对三维(3D)面部扫描准确性的影响,重点关注不同尺寸的三个模型头部的真实性和精度。
使用了三个3D打印的模型头部,头围分别为30厘米、50厘米和65厘米。确定了10个面部标志点,以测量7个标志点间距离和2个角度。使用数字游标卡尺进行直接人体测量作为参考值,用于测量线性距离,角度则使用余弦定理计算。每个头部使用两种系统扫描6次:双结构光面部扫描仪(iTom)和立体摄影测量系统(3dMD)。分别使用Meshlab和Blender对数字测量结果进行距离和角度分析。通过将测量结果与参考测量值进行比较来确定真实性值,而精度值则来自6次扫描之间的变异性。由于方差不齐,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析,随后进行Bonferroni校正以进行成对组比较。
对于每个扫描系统,真实性和精度的总体偏差随着头围的增加而显著增加。7个距离中的5个和1个角度在头围较大时真实性出现显著下降。除了N-Pn和Pn-Sn外,大多数测量结果由于头围变化而精度显著降低。此外,与iTom相比,3dMD显示出更高的总体真实性,7个线性测量中的5个和1个角度测量结果更好。
头围对两种技术的3D面部扫描的真实性和精度均有显著影响,这表明对面部较大的情况进行面部成像时应谨慎使用。选择合适的扫描系统,如3dMD,有助于减轻扫描较大物体的负面影响。