Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Health Sciences and Technologies Graduate Program, University of Brasilia (UnB), Centro Metropolitano, Conjunto A-Lote 01, Ceilândia, Brasília, 72220-900, DF, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72965-0.
This study aims to (1) compare the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO2p), skeletal muscle deoxygenation ([HHb]), and microvascular O delivery (QOmv) between heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and (2) explore the correlation between body composition, kinetic parameters, and exercise performance. Twenty-one patients (10 HFpEF and 11 HFrEF) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess VO kinetics, with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) employed to measure [HHb]. Microvascular O delivery (QOmv) was calculated using the Fick principle. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was performed to evaluate body composition. HFrEF patients exhibited significantly slower VO kinetics (time constant [t]: 63 ± 10.8 s vs. 45.4 ± 7.9 s; P < 0.05) and quicker [HHb] response (t: 12.4 ± 9.9 s vs. 25 ± 11.6 s; P < 0.05). Microvascular O2 delivery (QOmv) was higher in HFrEF patients (3.6 ± 1.2 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8; P < 0.05), who also experienced shorter time to exercise intolerance (281.6 ± 84 s vs. 405.3 ± 96 s; P < 0.05). Correlation analyses revealed a significant negative relationship between time to exercise and both QOmv (ρ= -0.51; P < 0.05) and VO2 kinetics (ρ= -0.63). Body adiposity was negatively correlated with [HHb] amplitude (ρ= -0.78) and peak VO (ρ= -0.54), while a positive correlation was observed between lean muscle percentage, [HHb] amplitude, and tau (ρ= 0.74 and 0.57; P < 0.05), respectively. HFrEF patients demonstrate more severely impaired VO2p kinetics, skeletal muscle deoxygenation, and microvascular O delivery compared to HFpEF patients, indicating compromised peripheral function. Additionally, increased adiposity and reduced lean mass are linked to decreased oxygen diffusion capacity and impaired oxygen uptake kinetics in HFrEF patients.
本研究旨在:(1) 比较射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者与射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者的肺氧摄取(VO2p)、骨骼肌去氧([HHb])和微血管 O 输送(QOmv)动力学;(2) 探讨体成分、动力学参数与运动能力之间的相关性。21 例患者(HFpEF 组 10 例,HFrEF 组 11 例)行心肺运动试验以评估 VO2 动力学,采用近红外光谱(NIRS)测量 [HHb]。微血管 O 输送(QOmv)使用 Fick 原理计算。双能 X 射线吸收法(DEXA)评估体成分。HFrEF 患者的 VO2 动力学明显较慢(时变常数 [t]:63±10.8 s 比 45.4±7.9 s;P<0.05),[HHb]反应更快(t:12.4±9.9 s 比 25±11.6 s;P<0.05)。HFrEF 患者的微血管 O2 输送(QOmv)较高(3.6±1.2 比 1.7±0.8;P<0.05),运动不耐受时间也较短(281.6±84 s 比 405.3±96 s;P<0.05)。相关性分析显示,运动不耐受时间与 QOmv(ρ=-0.51;P<0.05)和 VO2 动力学(ρ=-0.63)呈显著负相关。体脂与 [HHb]幅度(ρ=-0.78)和峰值 VO(ρ=-0.54)呈负相关,而瘦肌肉百分比、[HHb]幅度和 tau 呈正相关(ρ=0.74 和 0.57;P<0.05)。与 HFpEF 患者相比,HFrEF 患者的 VO2p 动力学、骨骼肌去氧和微血管 O 输送受损更为严重,提示外周功能受损。此外,在 HFrEF 患者中,体脂增加和瘦肌肉减少与氧扩散能力降低和氧摄取动力学受损有关。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2019-1-2
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013-3-22
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017-10-19
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016-2-23
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015-11
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015-9-15
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014-3-21