Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Division of Cardiology, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 4;11(10):e0163513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163513. eCollection 2016.
The goals of the current study were to compare leg blood flow, oxygen extraction and oxygen uptake (VO2) after constant load sub-maximal unilateral knee extension (ULKE) exercise in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Previously, it has been shown that prolonged whole body VO2 recovery kinetics are directly related to disease severity and all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients. To date, no study has simultaneously measured muscle-specific blood flow and oxygen extraction post exercise recovery kinetics in HFrEF or HFpEF patients; therefore it is unknown if muscle VO2 recovery kinetics, and more specifically, the recovery kinetics of blood flow and oxygen extraction at the level of the muscle, differ between HF phenotypes. Ten older (68±10yrs) HFrEF (n = 5) and HFpEF (n = 5) patients performed sub-maximal (85% of maximal weight lifted during an incremental test) ULKE exercise for 4 minutes. Femoral venous blood flow and venous O2 saturation were measured continuously from the onset of end-exercise, using a novel MRI method, to determine off-kinetics (mean response times, MRT) for leg VO2 and its determinants. HFpEF and HFrEF patients had similar end-exercise leg blood flow (1.1±0.6 vs. 1.2±0.6 L/min, p>0.05), venous saturation (42±12 vs. 41±11%, p>0.05) and VO2 (0.13±0.08 vs. 0.11±0.05 L/min, p>0.05); however HFrEF had significantly delayed recovery MRT for flow (292±135sec. vs 105±63sec., p = 0.004) and VO2 (95±37sec. vs. 47±15sec., p = 0.005) compared to HFpEF. Impaired muscle VO2 recovery kinetics following ULKE exercise differentiated HFrEF from HFpEF patients and suggests distinct underlying pathology and potential therapeutic approaches in these populations.
本研究的目的是比较射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者在进行恒定负荷的单侧膝关节伸展(ULKE)运动后腿部血液流量、氧气提取和氧气摄取(VO2)的差异。此前,研究表明,全身 VO2 恢复动力学延长与 HFrEF 患者的疾病严重程度和全因死亡率直接相关。迄今为止,尚无研究同时测量 HFrEF 或 HFpEF 患者运动后肌肉特异性血液流量和氧气提取恢复动力学;因此,尚不清楚肌肉 VO2 恢复动力学,特别是肌肉水平的血液流量和氧气提取的恢复动力学是否在 HF 表型之间存在差异。10 名年龄较大的(68±10 岁)HFrEF(n=5)和 HFpEF(n=5)患者进行了 4 分钟的亚最大(递增试验中最大举起重量的 85%)ULKE 运动。使用一种新的 MRI 方法,从运动结束开始连续测量股静脉血流和静脉血氧饱和度,以确定腿部 VO2 及其决定因素的离线动力学(平均响应时间,MRT)。HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者的运动结束时腿部血流(1.1±0.6 与 1.2±0.6 L/min,p>0.05)、静脉饱和度(42±12 与 41±11%,p>0.05)和 VO2(0.13±0.08 与 0.11±0.05 L/min,p>0.05)相似;然而,HFrEF 患者的血流(292±135sec. 与 105±63sec.,p=0.004)和 VO2(95±37sec. 与 47±15sec.,p=0.005)的恢复 MRT 明显延迟。ULKE 运动后肌肉 VO2 恢复动力学受损可将 HFrEF 与 HFpEF 患者区分开来,并提示这些人群存在不同的潜在病理和潜在治疗方法。