• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于关节线会聚角的调整规划可提高高位胫骨开放楔形截骨术后站立位的矫正精度。

Adjusted planning based on the joint line convergence angle improves correction accuracy in the standing position after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 28;19(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05096-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05096-x
PMID:39342372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11437682/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) is known to be a factor affecting correction error in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The purpose of this study was to assess whether preoperative planning that considers change of the JLCA can achieve accurate correction in the standing position after OWHTO.

METHODS

OWHTO was performed for 109 knees with osteoarthritis of the knee. The amount of angular correction was planned aiming to achieve mechanical valgus of 5° in 55 knees (conventional planning), and it was adjusted in 54 knees (adjusted planning) according to the preoperative JLCA as follows: not changed with JLCA ≤ 3°; decreased 1° with JLCA 4-6°; decreased 2° with JLCA 7-8°; and decreased 3° with JLCA ≥ 9°. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, JLCA, and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing long-leg radiographs. Correction error ≤ 2º was defined as the acceptable range, and correction error > 2º was defined as an outlier.

RESULTS

The conventional planning group had a significantly greater postoperative HKA angle than the adjusted planning group (6.1º and 4.9º, respectively). The mean JLCA decreased from 4.8º to 2.6º in the conventional planning group and from 4.6º to 2.7º in the adjusted planning group. The conventional planning group had significantly greater postoperative MPTA than the adjusted planning group (96.2º and 94.7º, respectively). The rate of outliers with correction error > 2º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (9%) than in the conventional planning group (24%). The rate of the MPTA > 95º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (30%) than in the conventional planning group (69%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that preoperative planning with adjustment of the correction angle according to the preoperative JLCA improved correction accuracy in the standing position after OWHTO.

摘要

背景

关节线会聚角(JLCA)的术后变化已知是影响开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术(OWHTO)开口矫正误差的因素。本研究旨在评估是否可以通过考虑 JLCA 变化的术前规划来实现 OWHTO 后站立位的准确矫正。

方法

对 109 例膝关节骨关节炎行 OWHTO。为 55 例膝关节(常规规划)计划了角度矫正量,以实现 5°的机械外翻,并根据术前 JLCA 调整了 54 例膝关节(调整规划),如下所示:JLCA≤3°时不变;JLCA 为 4-6°时减少 1°;JLCA 为 7-8°时减少 2°;JLCA≥9°时减少 3°。在站立位长腿 X 线片上测量髋膝踝(HKA)角、JLCA 和胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)。将矫正误差≤2º定义为可接受范围,将矫正误差>2º定义为异常值。

结果

常规规划组术后 HKA 角明显大于调整规划组(分别为 6.1º和 4.9º)。常规规划组 JLCA 从 4.8º降至 2.6º,调整规划组从 4.6º降至 2.7º。常规规划组术后 MPTA 明显大于调整规划组(分别为 96.2º和 94.7º)。调整规划组矫正误差>2º的异常值率(9%)明显低于常规规划组(24%)。调整规划组 MPTA>95º的发生率(30%)明显低于常规规划组(69%)。

结论

本研究表明,根据术前 JLCA 调整矫正角度的术前规划可提高 OWHTO 后站立位的矫正准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/1dc9ad55e361/13018_2024_5096_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/fafb26743934/13018_2024_5096_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/c5173df35cc9/13018_2024_5096_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/0d8720b63817/13018_2024_5096_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/1dc9ad55e361/13018_2024_5096_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/fafb26743934/13018_2024_5096_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/c5173df35cc9/13018_2024_5096_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/0d8720b63817/13018_2024_5096_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77b1/11437682/1dc9ad55e361/13018_2024_5096_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adjusted planning based on the joint line convergence angle improves correction accuracy in the standing position after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.基于关节线会聚角的调整规划可提高高位胫骨开放楔形截骨术后站立位的矫正精度。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 28;19(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05096-x.
2
The tipping point in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy relates to the shape of the proximal tibia more than to lower limb alignment correction.高位胫骨内侧开放楔形截骨术的转折点与胫骨近端的形状关系更密切,而不是与下肢对线矫正关系更密切。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Apr;32(4):1008-1015. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12121. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Increased preoperative medial and lateral laxity is a predictor of overcorrection in open wedge high tibial osteotomy.术前内侧和外侧松弛度增加是开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术过度矫正的预测因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3164-3172. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05805-8. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
4
The medial proximal tibial angle accurately corrects the limb alignment in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.内侧胫骨近端角可精确矫正开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术的下肢对线。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2410-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5216-8. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Postoperative change in the joint-line convergence angle is associated with inaccurate correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.术后关节线会聚角的变化与开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术中不准确的矫正有关。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 13;18(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04248-9.
6
Difference in the early postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle between opening wedge and closed wedge high tibial osteotomies.关节线会聚角在开放式楔形和闭合式楔形胫骨高位截骨术后早期变化的差异。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02214-x.
7
Patient-specific prediction of joint line convergence angle after high tibial osteotomy using a whole-leg radiograph standing on lateral-wedge insole.利用外侧楔形鞋垫站立位全下肢 X 线片预测胫骨高位截骨术后关节线会聚角的个体化预测。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3200-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05821-8. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Difference in joint line convergence angle between the supine and standing positions is the most important predictive factor of coronal correction error after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.仰卧位与站立位胫骨近端内侧开放楔形截骨术后冠状面矫正误差的最重要预测因素是关节线会聚角的差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1516-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05555-7. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Preoperative soft tissue laxity around knee was associated with less accurate alignment correction after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy.术前膝关节周围软组织松弛与混合闭合楔形胫骨高位截骨术后对线矫正精度降低有关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Sep;28(9):3022-3030. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05762-2. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy using intraoperative control of joint line convergence angle with reference to preoperative supine radiograph.术中参考仰卧位 X 线片控制关节线会聚角行胫骨高位截骨术。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03738-3. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative change in the joint-line convergence angle is associated with inaccurate correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.术后关节线会聚角的变化与开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术中不准确的矫正有关。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 13;18(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04248-9.
2
A significant rate of tibial overcorrection with an increased JLO occurred after isolated high tibial osteotomy without considering international consensus.在未考虑国际共识的情况下,单纯高位胫骨截骨术后出现了较高比例的胫骨过度矫正以及JLO增加的情况。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):4927-4934. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07518-5. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review.
高位胫骨截骨术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎后关节线倾斜的临床意义仍存在争议:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4355-4367. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07486-w. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
The gap height in open wedge high tibial osteotomy is not affected by the starting point of the osteotomy.在开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术中,间隙高度不受截骨起始点的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 11;24(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06478-8.
5
Cartilage Degeneration of the Lateral Compartment of the Knee at Second-Look Arthroscopy Is Associated With Deterioration of 10-Year Clinical Outcomes After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.二次关节镜检查时膝关节外侧间室软骨退变与开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术后10年临床疗效恶化相关。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Nov;39(11):2354-2362. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Preoperative joint line convergence angle correction is a key factor in optimising accuracy in varus knee correction osteotomy.术前关节线会聚角的矫正,是优化内翻型膝矫正截骨术准确性的关键因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1583-1592. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07092-2. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
7
Difference in the early postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle between opening wedge and closed wedge high tibial osteotomies.关节线会聚角在开放式楔形和闭合式楔形胫骨高位截骨术后早期变化的差异。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02214-x.
8
Change of joint-line convergence angle should be considered for accurate alignment correction in high tibial osteotomy.在高位胫骨截骨术中,为了进行精确的对线矫正,应考虑关节线汇聚角的变化。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021 Jan 11;33(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00076-x.
9
Intraoperatively accurate limb alignment after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can be lost by large knee joint line convergence angle during surgery.术中准确的下肢对线在施行胫骨高位楔形截骨术后可能会因术中较大的膝关节线会聚角而丢失。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jan;141(1):23-28. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03419-1. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
10
Difference in joint line convergence angle between the supine and standing positions is the most important predictive factor of coronal correction error after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.仰卧位与站立位胫骨近端内侧开放楔形截骨术后冠状面矫正误差的最重要预测因素是关节线会聚角的差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1516-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05555-7. Epub 2019 Jul 9.