Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 11;24(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06478-8.
In open-wedge high-tibial-osteotomy (OWHTO), most surgeons use a preoperative planning software and realise that they should match the intraoperative alignment correction with the preoperative plan. We aimed to determine whether there is a difference in osteotomy gap height when starting the OWHTO either 3 or 4 cm distal to the joint line. This should help to clarify whether the osteotomy starting point must exactly match the preoperative planning.
25 patients with constitutional varus alignment were planned for OWHTO. Long-leg-standing-radiographs and mediCAD-software were used. Osteotomy was planned to a neutral Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) of 0°. The osteotomy-starting-point was either 3 or 4 cm distal to the medial joint line. The following angles were compared: mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line conversion angle (JCA), mechanical Tibio-Femoral angle (mTFA) or Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle.
25 Patients (18 males, 7 females) had a mean age of 62 ± 16.6 years and showed a varus-aligned leg-axis. The HKA was - 5.96 ± 3.02° with a mMPTA of 82.22 ± 1.14°. After osteotomy-planning to a HKA of 0°, the mMPTA was 88.94 ± 3.01°. With a mean wedge height of 8.08 mm when locating the osteotomy 3 cm and a mean wedge height of 8.05 mm when locating the osteotomy 4 cm distal to the joint-line, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.7).
When performing an OWHTO aiming towards the tip of the fibula, the osteotomy starting point does not need to exactly match the planned starting-location of the osteotomy. A starting-point 1 cm more distal or proximal than previously determined through the digital planning does not alter the size of the osteotomy gap needed to produce the desired amount of correction.
在开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术(OWHTO)中,大多数外科医生使用术前规划软件,并意识到他们应该使术中的矫正与术前计划相匹配。我们旨在确定在距关节线 3 或 4cm 处开始 OWHTO 时,截骨间隙的高度是否存在差异。这应该有助于澄清截骨起始点是否必须与术前计划完全匹配。
对 25 例结构性内翻患者进行 OWHTO 规划。使用长腿站立位 X 线片和 mediCAD 软件。截骨计划中立髋膝踝角(HKA)为 0°。截骨起始点位于内侧关节线远端 3 或 4cm 处。比较以下角度:机械内侧近段胫骨角(mMPTA)、机械外侧远端股骨角(mLDFA)、关节线转换角(JCA)、机械胫股角(mTFA)或髋膝踝(HKA)角。
25 例患者(18 例男性,7 例女性)平均年龄 62±16.6 岁,下肢呈内翻排列。HKA 为-5.96±3.02°,mMPTA 为 82.22±1.14°。在将 HKA 计划为 0°后,mMPTA 为 88.94±3.01°。当截骨位置在距关节线 3cm 处时,平均楔形高度为 8.08mm,在距关节线 4cm 处时,平均楔形高度为 8.05mm,差异无统计学意义(p=0.7)。
当行 OWHTO 以指向腓骨尖时,截骨起始点不需要与术前计划的截骨起始位置完全匹配。与数字规划确定的起始位置相比,截骨起始点向近端或远端移动 1cm 不会改变所需的截骨间隙大小来产生所需的矫正量。