Kwon Joseph, Raghunandan Rakhee, Nghiem Son Hong, Howard Kirsten, Lancsar Emily, Huynh Elisabeth, Howell Martin, Petrou Stavros, Smith Sarah
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Value Health. 2025 Jan;28(1):88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL GCS), comprising 23 items covering 4 subscales (physical, emotional, social, and school functioning), is a widely applied generic measure of childhood health-related quality of life but does not provide health utilities for cost-effectiveness-based decision making. This study aimed to develop a reduced item version of PedsQL GCS amenable to health utility derivation in Australia.
Data sources were 2 cohorts of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, including proxy responses for all PedsQL GCS versions (Toddlers, Young Children, Children, and Teens), and the CheckPoint sample containing child self-report to the Children version. Three analytic samples were CheckPoint sample (n = 1874); Mallinson sample containing 1 measurement per child from one of the Young Children, Children, or Teens versions (n = 7855); and Toddlers sample (n = 7401). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses assessed dimensionality. Psychometric analyses used Rasch and classical criteria on 3 randomly selected subsamples (n = 500) per sample. Item selection prioritized psychometric performance in the CheckPoint sample, also considering performance in other samples and conceptual content.
Dimensionality assessments did not generate an alternative empirical structure for the measure, and psychometric analyses were conducted on the original 4 subscales. The selected items were: "Get aches and pains" for physical functioning; "Feel sad/blue" for emotional functioning; "Other kids not friends" for social functioning; and "Keeping up with school work" for school functioning.
The final 4-item set, pending further psychometric validation and valuation, can generate health utilities from the widely used PedsQL GCS to inform cost-effectiveness-based decision making.
儿童生活质量量表第4.0版通用核心量表(PedsQL GCS)由23个项目组成,涵盖4个分量表(身体、情感、社会和学校功能),是一种广泛应用的儿童健康相关生活质量通用测量工具,但未提供用于基于成本效益的决策的健康效用值。本研究旨在开发一个简化版的PedsQL GCS,以便在澳大利亚得出健康效用值。
数据来源为澳大利亚儿童纵向研究的2个队列,包括所有PedsQL GCS版本(幼儿版、年幼儿童版、儿童版和青少年版)的代理报告,以及包含儿童对儿童版自我报告的CheckPoint样本。三个分析样本分别为CheckPoint样本(n = 1874);Mallinson样本,包含来自年幼儿童版、儿童版或青少年版之一的每个儿童的1次测量数据(n = 7855);以及幼儿样本(n = 7401)。探索性和验证性因素分析评估维度。心理测量分析使用Rasch和经典标准,对每个样本随机抽取的3个子样本(n = 500)进行分析。项目选择优先考虑CheckPoint样本中的心理测量性能,同时也考虑其他样本中的性能和概念内容。
维度评估未产生该测量工具的替代实证结构,因此对原始的4个分量表进行了心理测量分析。所选项目为:身体功能方面的“感到疼痛”;情感功能方面的“感到悲伤/忧郁”;社会功能方面的“其他孩子不是朋友”;以及学校功能方面的“跟上学业”。
最终的4个项目集在经过进一步的心理测量验证和赋值后,可从广泛使用的PedsQL GCS中得出健康效用值,为基于成本效益的决策提供依据。