• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心验证改良的出血与输血评估(RABT)评分对预测大量输血的价值。

Multicenter Validation of the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score for Predicting Massive Transfusion.

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Room 5411, P.O. Box 245063, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.

Divsion of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery, and Critical Care, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2020 Jun;44(6):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05394-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-020-05394-5
PMID:32006133
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion (MT) is a lifesaving treatment for hemorrhaging patients. Predicting the need for MT is crucial to improve survival. The aim of our study was to validate the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score to predict MT in a multicenter cohort of trauma patients.

METHODS

We performed a (2015-2017) analysis of adult (age ≥ 18 year) trauma patients who had a high-level trauma team activation at three Level I trauma centers. The RABT was calculated using the 4-point score [blunt (0)/penetrating trauma (1), shock index ≥ 1 (1), pelvic fracture (1), and FAST positive (1)]. A RABT score of ≥ 2 was used to predict MT (≥ 10 units of packed red blood cells within 24 h). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the score's predictive power compared to the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1018 patients: 216 (facility I), 363 (facility II), and 439 (facility III). The mean age was 41 ± 19 year, and the injury severity score (ISS) was 29 [22-36]. The overall MT rate was 19%. The overall AUROC of RABT ≥ 2 was 0.89. The sensitivity of the RABT ≥ 2 was 78%, and the specificity was 91%. The RABT score had a higher sensitivity (78% vs. 69%) and specificity (91% vs. 82%) than the ABC score.

CONCLUSION

The RABT score is a valid tool to predict MT in severely injured trauma patients. It is an objective score that aids clinicians in predicting the need for MT to mobilize blood products and minimize the waste of resources.

摘要

背景

大量输血(MT)是治疗出血患者的救命治疗方法。预测 MT 的需求对于提高生存率至关重要。我们的研究目的是验证修订后的出血和输血评估(RABT)评分在多中心创伤患者队列中预测 MT 的能力。

方法

我们对三家一级创伤中心的高水平创伤团队激活的成年(年龄≥18 岁)创伤患者进行了(2015-2017 年)分析。使用 4 分评分[钝器(0)/穿透性创伤(1)、休克指数≥1(1)、骨盆骨折(1)和 FAST 阳性(1)]计算 RABT。使用 RABT 评分≥2 预测 MT(24 小时内≥10 个单位的浓缩红细胞)。计算接收者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积以评估与血液消耗评估(ABC)评分相比,该评分的预测能力。

结果

我们分析了 1018 名患者:116 名来自设施 I,363 名来自设施 II,439 名来自设施 III。平均年龄为 41±19 岁,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为 29[22-36]。总体 MT 率为 19%。RABT≥2 的总体 AUROC 为 0.89。RABT≥2 的敏感性为 78%,特异性为 91%。RABT 评分的敏感性(78%比 69%)和特异性(91%比 82%)均高于 ABC 评分。

结论

RABT 评分是预测严重创伤患者 MT 的有效工具。它是一种客观评分,可以帮助临床医生预测 MT 的需求,以动员血液制品并最大程度地减少资源浪费。

相似文献

1
Multicenter Validation of the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score for Predicting Massive Transfusion.多中心验证改良的出血与输血评估(RABT)评分对预测大量输血的价值。
World J Surg. 2020 Jun;44(6):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05394-5.
2
Prediction of massive transfusion with the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score at Canadian level I trauma centers.在加拿大一级创伤中心采用修订版出血与输血评估(RABT)评分预测大量输血情况。
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.022. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Massive Transfusion: The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score.大量输血:出血与输血的修订评估(RABT)评分
World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3560-3567. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4674-y.
4
Multicenter validation of a simplified score to predict massive transfusion in trauma.一种预测创伤患者大量输血的简化评分系统的多中心验证
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S33-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e42411.
5
Predicting the need for massive transfusion in trauma patients: the Traumatic Bleeding Severity Score.预测创伤患者大量输血的需求:创伤性出血严重程度评分。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 May;76(5):1243-50. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000200.
6
Accuracy of shock index versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in trauma patients.休克指数与ABC评分预测创伤患者大量输血需求的准确性。
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
7
Comparison of massive and emergency transfusion prediction scoring systems after trauma with a new Bleeding Risk Index score applied in-flight.创伤后大量和紧急输血预测评分系统的比较,应用了一种新的 Bleeding Risk Index 评分,在飞行中进行。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Feb 1;90(2):268-273. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003031.
8
Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.使用休克指数、改良休克指数和年龄休克指数预测创伤性休克患者的大量输血情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 5;13(7):683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070683.
9
Evaluating the Shock Index, Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT), Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) and novel PTTrauma score to predict critical transfusion threshold (CAT) in penetrating thoracic trauma.评估休克指数、修订的出血和输血评估(RABT)、血液消耗评估(ABC)和新型 PTTrauma 评分,以预测穿透性胸部创伤的关键输血阈值(CAT)。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62579-x.
10
Comparison of massive blood transfusion predictive models in the rural setting.农村地区大量输血预测模型的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):211-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318240507b.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility of monitoring trauma patients with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound.使用无线可穿戴式多普勒超声监测创伤患者的可行性。
Transfusion. 2025 May;65 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S123-S130. doi: 10.1111/trf.18241. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Predicting the critical administration threshold in bleeding trauma patients.预测出血性创伤患者的关键给药阈值。
CJEM. 2024 Nov;26(11):790-796. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00776-3. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Femoral blood gas analysis, a new promising tool to assess hemorrhagic shock status.股动脉血气分析,一种评估失血性休克状态的新的有前景的工具。

本文引用的文献

1
The use of ABC score in activation of massive transfusion: The yin and the yang.ABC 评分在大量输血激活中的应用:阴与阳。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Aug;85(2):298-302. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001949.
2
Massive Transfusion: The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score.大量输血:出血与输血的修订评估(RABT)评分
World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3560-3567. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4674-y.
3
Hemorrhagic Shock.失血性休克
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jul 18;86(9):4954-4956. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002380. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Evaluating the Shock Index, Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT), Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) and novel PTTrauma score to predict critical transfusion threshold (CAT) in penetrating thoracic trauma.评估休克指数、修订的出血和输血评估(RABT)、血液消耗评估(ABC)和新型 PTTrauma 评分,以预测穿透性胸部创伤的关键输血阈值(CAT)。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62579-x.
5
The predictive value of four traumatic hemorrhage scores for early massive blood transfusion in trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting.四种创伤性出血评分对创伤患者院前早期大量输血的预测价值。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):967-973. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02412-8. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Noninvasive Monitoring of Simulated Hemorrhage and Whole Blood Resuscitation.模拟失血性休克及全血复苏的无创监测。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 14;12(12):1168. doi: 10.3390/bios12121168.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 25;378(4):370-379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1705649.
4
Current trends in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries.血流动力学不稳定骨盆环损伤的处理现状。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Dec;23(6):511-519. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000454.
5
Accuracy of shock index versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in trauma patients.休克指数与ABC评分预测创伤患者大量输血需求的准确性。
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.使用休克指数、改良休克指数和年龄休克指数预测创伤性休克患者的大量输血情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 5;13(7):683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070683.
7
Clinical gestalt and the prediction of massive transfusion after trauma.临床整体判断与创伤后大量输血的预测
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.026. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial.严重创伤患者血浆、血小板和红细胞以1:1:1与1:1:2比例输注及死亡率:PROPPR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):471-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12.
9
Massive transfusion prediction with inclusion of the pre-hospital Shock Index.纳入院前休克指数的大量输血预测
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):822-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Review article: shock index for prediction of critical bleeding post-trauma: a systematic review.综述文章:创伤后预测严重出血的休克指数:一项系统综述
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Jun;26(3):223-8. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12232. Epub 2014 Apr 8.