• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半月板撕裂修复术中用于防止缝线切割穿出的打结力:打结过程中失效负荷的生物力学评估

Suture Tying Force for Cut-Out during Radial Meniscus Tear Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Failure Loads during the Knot-Tying Process.

作者信息

Massey Patrick A, Dudoussat Edwin, Montgomery Carver, Scalisi Wayne, McBride Hayden, Rutz Robert, Solitro Giovanni F

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.

出版信息

Cartilage. 2024 Sep 29:19476035241284827. doi: 10.1177/19476035241284827.

DOI:10.1177/19476035241284827
PMID:39344014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11556578/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to determine average tensile forces resulting in suture failure while tying a knot during repair of complete radial meniscus tears and to compare the failure tensile force based on meniscus tissue location: the peripheral (red-red) versus inner (white-white).

DESIGN

This study was designed as a cadaveric biomechanical study using 24 menisci harvested from fresh frozen cadaveric knees with midbody radial tears. Tears were repaired using 2-0 nonabsorbable suture in both the inner meniscus and the peripheral meniscus. A force gauge was used to measure the tension of a surgeon's knot until failure of either the suture or the meniscus tissue. Statistical analysis was performed comparing suture failure tensile forces between inner and peripheral sutures using 2-sample test.

RESULTS

Suture repairs primarily failed due to meniscal tissue cut-out after suture tensioning (96%). There was no statistical difference in failure mode between medial and lateral meniscus for both the inner (100% cut-out) and the peripheral (92% cut-out; = 0.703) sutures. The peripheral sutures failed as significantly higher loads (54 ± 26 N) than the inner sutures (36 ± 11 N, = 0.006). The peripheral meniscus tissue tolerated significantly higher tension at failure (36 ± 7 N) than the inner meniscus (26 ± 7 N, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When tying parallel sutures to repair a radial meniscus tear, suture tensile forces above 30 N may tear through meniscus tissue. Surgeons should not use suture tying forces above 30 N when repairing radial meniscus tears with parallel sutures. The peripheral meniscus can withstand higher knot-tying forces than the inner meniscus, so surgeons should consider tying the peripheral suture before the inner suture.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定在完全性桡侧半月板撕裂修复过程中打结时导致缝线断裂的平均拉力,并根据半月板组织位置(外周[红-红]与内侧[白-白])比较断裂拉力。

设计

本研究设计为尸体生物力学研究,使用从新鲜冷冻尸体膝关节获取的24个有体中部桡侧撕裂的半月板。在内侧半月板和外周半月板均使用2-0不可吸收缝线修复撕裂。使用测力计测量外科结的张力,直至缝线或半月板组织断裂。采用双样本检验对内侧和外周缝线的缝线断裂拉力进行统计分析。

结果

缝线修复主要因缝线张紧后半月板组织穿出而失败(96%)。内侧和外侧半月板的内侧(100%穿出)和外周(92%穿出;P = 0.703)缝线在失败模式上无统计学差异。外周缝线的断裂负荷(54±26 N)显著高于内侧缝线(36±11 N,P = 0.006)。外周半月板组织在断裂时耐受的张力(36±7 N)显著高于内侧半月板(26±7 N,P < 0.001)。

结论

在使用平行缝线修复桡侧半月板撕裂时,缝线拉力超过30 N可能会撕裂半月板组织。外科医生在用平行缝线修复桡侧半月板撕裂时,不应使用超过30 N的缝线打结力。外周半月板比内侧半月板能承受更高的打结力,因此外科医生应考虑先打外周缝线,再打内侧缝线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/46a2c8bdc667/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/9d14307dd46e/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/7b20ed934070/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/3efb1bcd4930/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/d411c6ff4383/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/46a2c8bdc667/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/9d14307dd46e/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/7b20ed934070/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/3efb1bcd4930/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/d411c6ff4383/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d4/11556578/46a2c8bdc667/10.1177_19476035241284827-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Suture Tying Force for Cut-Out during Radial Meniscus Tear Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Failure Loads during the Knot-Tying Process.半月板撕裂修复术中用于防止缝线切割穿出的打结力:打结过程中失效负荷的生物力学评估
Cartilage. 2024 Sep 29:19476035241284827. doi: 10.1177/19476035241284827.
2
A Novel Repair Method for Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus: Biomechanical Comparison of Transtibial 2-Tunnel and Double Horizontal Mattress Suture Techniques Under Cyclic Loading.内侧半月板放射状撕裂的一种新型修复方法:循环加载下经胫骨双隧道与双水平褥式缝合技术的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):639-45. doi: 10.1177/0363546515615565. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
The rebar repair for radial meniscus tears: a biomechanical comparison of a reinforced suture repair versus parallel and cross-stitch techniques.用于修复外侧半月板撕裂的钢筋修复:加强缝合修复与平行和十字缝合法的生物力学比较
J Exp Orthop. 2019 Aug 22;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40634-019-0206-4.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Novel Repair Techniques for Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus: The 2-Tunnel Transtibial Technique, a "Hybrid" Horizontal and Vertical Mattress Suture Configuration, and a Combined "Hybrid Tunnel" Technique.三种新型内侧半月板径向撕裂修复技术的生物力学比较:双隧道胫骨隧道技术、“杂交”水平垂直褥式缝合构型和联合“杂交隧道”技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):651-658. doi: 10.1177/0363546518816949. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Arthroscopic meniscal repair with use of the outside-in technique.采用由外向内技术进行关节镜下半月板修复。
Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:195-206.
6
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique).半月板内侧根部修复与挤压修复(中心化技术)联合应用
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Aug 10;13(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00008. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
7
Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repair constructs for radial tears of the meniscus.半月板桡侧撕裂关节镜修复结构的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2270-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546515591994. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
8
Radial Tears of the Lateral Meniscus-Two Novel Repair Techniques: A Biomechanical Study.外侧半月板放射状撕裂——两种新型修复技术:一项生物力学研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 27;6(4):2325967118768086. doi: 10.1177/2325967118768086. eCollection 2018 Apr.
9
Placement of sutures for inside-out meniscal repair: both sutures through meniscal tissue reduces displacement on cyclical loading.半月板由内向外修复时缝线的放置:两根缝线均穿过半月板组织可减少周期性负荷下的移位。
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Oct 21;8(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00417-z.
10
Several Techniques Exist With Favorable Biomechanical Outcomes in Radial Meniscus Tear Repair-A Systematic Review.几种技术在修复放射状半月板撕裂中具有良好的生物力学效果——系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Aug;38(8):2557-2578.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture, All-Inside Meniscus Repair Devices in a Human Cadaveric Meniscus Model.人尸体半月板模型中全缝线、全内置半月板修复装置的生物力学比较
Cartilage. 2025 Jun;16(2):150-158. doi: 10.1177/19476035241234315. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of the Simple Suture Technique, Meniscal Matrix-Assisted Repair, and a Novel Meniscus Cap Suture Technique for Complex Meniscal Repair.简单缝合技术、半月板基质辅助修复与一种用于复杂半月板修复的新型半月板帽缝合技术的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Dec 21;11(12):23259671231217439. doi: 10.1177/23259671231217439. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Meniscus Radial Tears: Current Concepts on Management and Repair Techniques.
半月板放射状撕裂:治疗与修复技术的当前概念
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 May;16(5):182-191. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09831-5. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure.3829 例患者的半月板修复结果:至少 2 年至 5 年的随访期的荟萃分析:总失败率及影响失败因素分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(3):822-831. doi: 10.1177/03635465231158385. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
All-Inside Meniscus Repair.全内半月板修复术
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022 Aug;15(4):252-258. doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09766-3. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
6
Current concepts on meniscal repairs.半月板修复的当前概念。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Mar 3;27:101810. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101810. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Several Techniques Exist With Favorable Biomechanical Outcomes in Radial Meniscus Tear Repair-A Systematic Review.几种技术在修复放射状半月板撕裂中具有良好的生物力学效果——系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Aug;38(8):2557-2578.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
8
Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Healing Rates After Arthroscopic Repair of Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.关节镜下半月板撕裂修复术后愈合率的二次关节镜评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 22;9(10):23259671211038289. doi: 10.1177/23259671211038289. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Rehabilitation and Return to Play Following Meniscus Repair.半月板修复后的康复与重返运动。
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Sep 1;29(3):173-179. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000303.
10
Increased Construct Stiffness With Meniscal Repair Sutures and Devices Increases the Risk of Cheese-Wiring During Biomechanical Load-to-Failure Testing.半月板修复缝线和装置增加结构刚度会增加生物力学极限负荷测试期间出现“奶酪线”现象的风险。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun 15;9(6):23259671211015674. doi: 10.1177/23259671211015674. eCollection 2021 Jun.