Siawasch Sayed Ahmad Manoetjer, Yu Jize, Castro Ana B, Dhondt Rutger, Teughels Wim, Temmerman Andy, Quirynen Marc
Department of Oral Health Sciences, Periodontology, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Periodontol 2000. 2025 Feb;97(1):104-130. doi: 10.1111/prd.12609. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
In order to evaluate the therapeutic advantages of various autologous platelet concentrates (APC) as a single biomaterial during alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), a systematic review with meta-analyses was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were released prior to 2024. The selected papers compared an APC with either unassisted healing (blood clot) or another biomaterial during ARP (third molars were not included). The outcome parameters included alveolar bone dimension alterations, soft tissue healing, and post-op pain intensity. The search yielded 35 papers (33 studies), one applying platelet-rich plasma (PRP), six using plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), and 28 using leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). These studies showed a large heterogeneity (e.g., outcome parameters, timing, surgical approach, and inclusion criteria), which hindered drawing strong conclusions. In most studies, however, ARP with PRP, PRGF, and L-PRF alone produced faster soft tissue healing, less post-extraction pain, less alveolar ridge resorption, more socket bone fill, and a higher bone density when compared to unassisted (spontaneous) healing. The ultimate benefit appears to be significantly influenced by the surgical approach. Limited literature exists comparing APC with other biomaterials for ARP, resulting in inconclusive data. APC application for ARP is a promising strategy to improve soft and hard tissue healing and reduce post-extraction pain.
为了评估各种自体血小板浓缩物(APC)作为单一生物材料在牙槽嵴保存(ARP)过程中的治疗优势,进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Scopus数据库,以查找2024年之前发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。所选论文比较了在ARP过程中APC与无辅助愈合(血凝块)或另一种生物材料(不包括第三磨牙)的效果。结果参数包括牙槽骨尺寸改变、软组织愈合和术后疼痛强度。检索结果为35篇论文(33项研究),其中1项应用富血小板血浆(PRP),6项使用富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF),28项使用富白细胞和血小板纤维蛋白(L-PRF)。这些研究显示出很大的异质性(例如,结果参数、时间、手术方法和纳入标准),这妨碍了得出强有力的结论。然而,在大多数研究中,与无辅助(自发)愈合相比,单独使用PRP、PRGF和L-PRF进行ARP可使软组织愈合更快、拔牙后疼痛减轻、牙槽嵴吸收减少、牙槽窝骨填充更多且骨密度更高。最终益处似乎受到手术方法的显著影响。比较APC与其他生物材料用于ARP的文献有限,导致数据尚无定论。APC应用于ARP是一种有前景的策略,可改善软硬组织愈合并减轻拔牙后疼痛。