• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷砂酸蚀(SAE)和化学改性SAE牙科种植体的种植体稳定性商数评估:一项临床研究。

Evaluation of Implant Stability Quotient of Sandblasted Acid-Etched (SAE) and Chemical-Modified SAE Dental Implants: A Clinical Study.

作者信息

Satpathy Soumyadev, Varalakshmi Udutha, Tenglikar Pavan, Chowdary Koduru Ranga Roy, Khader Anas Abdul, Parihar Anuj Singh, Yashavanth Kumar D S, Samanta Anupa

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Fakir Mohan Medical College and Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2075-S2077. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_46_24. Epub 2024 May 13.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_46_24
PMID:39346139
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426763/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the current research was to assess the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of dental implants that were chemically changed with SAE and without SAE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients in the current study had dental implants fitted with SAE (Group I) and chemically altered SAE (Group II). After implant implantation, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed as soon as possible as well as one, three, six, nine, and twelve weeks later. Version 23.0 of SPSS Statistics for Windows was used to statistically analyze the results.

RESULT

In SAE dental implants (Group I), a highest RFA value of 84.1 and a minimum value of 42.2 were noted. In chemically modified implants, the SAE (group II) mean RFA value ranged from 30.3 to 87.1.

CONCLUSION

It has been noted that dental implants with surface treatment exhibit increased implant-bone osseointegration. Implants with hydrophilic surfaces osseointegrate more quickly than those with SAE areas.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估经表面酸蚀处理(SAE)和未经表面酸蚀处理的牙科种植体的种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)。

材料与方法

本研究中的患者植入了经表面酸蚀处理的牙科种植体(第一组)和经化学改变的表面酸蚀处理的种植体(第二组)。种植体植入后,尽快以及在1、3、6、9和12周后进行共振频率分析(RFA)。使用SPSS Statistics for Windows 23.0版本对结果进行统计分析。

结果

在经表面酸蚀处理的牙科种植体(第一组)中,记录到最高RFA值为84.1,最低值为42.2。在化学改性种植体中,经表面酸蚀处理的种植体(第二组)的平均RFA值范围为30.3至87.1。

结论

已经注意到,经过表面处理的牙科种植体表现出增强的种植体与骨的骨结合。具有亲水性表面的种植体比具有表面酸蚀处理区域的种植体骨结合更快。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Implant Stability Quotient of Sandblasted Acid-Etched (SAE) and Chemical-Modified SAE Dental Implants: A Clinical Study.喷砂酸蚀(SAE)和化学改性SAE牙科种植体的种植体稳定性商数评估:一项临床研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2075-S2077. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_46_24. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Resonance Frequency Analysis of Sand Blasted Acid Etched (SAE) and Chemical Modified Sae Dental Implants.喷砂酸蚀(SAE)和化学改性SAE牙科种植体共振频率分析的临床与影像学评估
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;9(1):55-59. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_367_18. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
3
Hydrophilic modification of sandblasted and acid-etched implants improves stability during early healing: a human double-blind randomized controlled trial.喷砂酸蚀种植体亲水改性提高早期愈合稳定性:一项人体双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 May;48(5):684-690. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial.仅改变表面处理的上颌后部植入物的共振频率分析:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):770-775. doi: 10.1111/cid.12510. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Histomorphometric evaluation of a dual acid-etched vs. a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid-etched implant surface. An experimental study in dogs.双酸蚀与化学改性亲水性双酸蚀种植体表面的组织形态计量学评估:一项在犬类动物中的实验研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):551-557. doi: 10.1111/clr.12833. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium-coated sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study.具有钙涂层喷砂、大粒度酸蚀(SLA)表面和未经机械嵌合放置的化学改性 SLA 表面的牙种植体获得的二次稳定性:一项临床前研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Dec;32(12):1474-1483. doi: 10.1111/clr.13848. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.激光蚀刻钛种植体表面与化学改性SLA钛种植体表面的生物力学评估:兔胫骨的去除扭矩和共振频率分析
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Aug;61:299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.034. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.化学改性喷砂/酸蚀钛腭部种植体的稳定性变化。一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):489-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01694.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
9
Resonance Frequency Analysis of Thermal Acid-Etched, Hydrophilic Implants During First 3 Months of Healing and Osseointegration in an Early-Loading Protocol.早期加载方案中热酸蚀亲水性种植体愈合和骨整合前3个月的共振频率分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):843-50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3985.
10
Use of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate the effects of surface properties on the stability of different implants.使用共振频率分析评估表面特性对不同种植体稳定性的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):239-245. doi: 10.1111/clr.13560. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Stability Comparison of Implants with Alumina Sandblasting and Acid Etching Surface Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.氧化铝喷砂和酸蚀表面处理种植体的稳定性比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 23;14(3):740. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030740.

本文引用的文献

1
Implant stability and survival rates of a hydrophilic versus a conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implant surface: Systematic review and meta-analysis.亲水表面与常规喷砂酸蚀种植体表面的种植体稳定性和存活率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Jun;151(6):444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.03.002.
2
Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation.喷砂和酸蚀钛牙种植体表面:系统评价与共聚焦显微镜评估
Materials (Basel). 2019 May 30;12(11):1763. doi: 10.3390/ma12111763.
3
A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Resonance Frequency Analysis of Sand Blasted Acid Etched (SAE) and Chemical Modified Sae Dental Implants.喷砂酸蚀(SAE)和化学改性SAE牙科种植体共振频率分析的临床与影像学评估
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;9(1):55-59. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_367_18. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial.仅改变表面处理的上颌后部植入物的共振频率分析:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):770-775. doi: 10.1111/cid.12510. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Can resonance frequency analysis predict failure risk of immediately loaded implants?共振频率分析能否预测即刻负载种植体的失败风险?
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul-Aug;25(4):326-39.
6
Resonance frequency analysis of 208 Straumann dental implants during the healing period.208颗士卓曼种植体愈合期的共振频率分析
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Apr;39(2):161-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00060. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.化学改性喷砂/酸蚀钛腭部种植体的稳定性变化。一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):489-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01694.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.