Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗结直肠癌患者的临床结局比较

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

作者信息

Saraiya Swapnil, Darji Dhara

机构信息

Surgical Registrar, University Hospital of North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, England.

Department of Anesthesia, Dr. M. K. Shah Medical College and Research Centre and Smt S. M. S. Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2461-S2463. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_316_24. Epub 2024 May 24.

Abstract

AIM

Our research compares the clinical results of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our analysis focused on a database that included data on patients with colorectal cancer who had laparoscopic or open surgery for stages I to III at a prestigious healthcare institute in India. Two groups of 50 patients underwent laparoscopic and 50 underwent conventional open colorectal surgery (OCRS and LCRS, respectively) throughout the same time. Patient demographics, operation data, initial postoperative outcomes, follow-up appointments, pathology results, and cancer stages were examined.

RESULTS

The LCRS group had a much longer operation time compared to the OCRS. Subjects in the LCRS group experienced a notably accelerated recovery after surgery. The hospital stay for the OCRS group was considerably longer compared to that in the LCRS group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a reliable and convenient alternative to the traditional open approach, providing comparable oncological efficacy.

摘要

目的

我们的研究比较了开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床结果。

材料与方法

我们的分析聚焦于一个数据库,该数据库包含了印度一家著名医疗机构中接受腹腔镜或开放性手术治疗I至III期结直肠癌患者的数据。在同一时期,两组各50例患者分别接受了腹腔镜结直肠手术和传统开放性结直肠手术(分别为OCRS和LCRS)。对患者的人口统计学数据、手术数据、术后初期结果、随访预约、病理结果和癌症分期进行了检查。

结果

与OCRS相比,LCRS组的手术时间长得多。LCRS组的患者术后恢复明显加快。与LCRS组相比,OCRS组的住院时间长得多。

结论

腹腔镜结直肠手术是传统开放手术的一种可靠且便捷的替代方法,具有相当的肿瘤学疗效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2461-S2463. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_316_24. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1334-1345. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0115. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends.
Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;147(8):724-31. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.358.
6
Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after colorectal surgery. Is it possible to maintain a mini-invasive approach?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5290-5294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4878-x. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 163 Patients in a Single Institution.
Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:530314. doi: 10.1155/2014/530314. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
8
Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resection for patients with colorectal cancers: a comparative study.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Apr;24(4):229-35. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0475. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 25;23(6):589-596. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190619-00247.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1237-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2848-y. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
2
Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3106-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5332-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
9
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safe and effective? - A systematic review.
Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1146-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9686-x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验