1Section of Colorectal Surgery, Service de General Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Clinical Research Committee, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 3Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):869-74. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000137.
The advantages associated with the laparoscopic approach are lost when conversion is required. Available predictive models have failed to show external validation. Body surface area is a recently described risk factor not included in these models.
The aim of this study was to develop a clinical rule including body surface area for predicting conversion in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
This was a prospective cohort study.
This study was conducted at a single large tertiary care institution.
Nine hundred sixteen patients (mean age, 63.9; range, 14-91 years; 53.2% female) who underwent surgery between January 2004 and August 2011 were identified from a prospective database.
Conversion rate was analyzed related to age, sex, obesity, disease location (colon vs rectum), type of disease (neoplastic vs nonneoplastic), history of previous surgery, and body surface area. A predictive model for conversion was developed with the use of logistic regression to identify independently associated variables, and a simple clinical prediction rule was derived. Internal validation of the model was performed by using bootstrapping.
The conversion rate was 9.9% (91/916). Rectal disease, large patient size, and male sex were independently associated with higher odds of conversion (OR, 2.28 95%CI, 1.47-3.46]), 1.88 [1.1-3.44], and 1.87 [1.04-3.24]). The prediction rule identified 3 risk groups: low risk (women and nonlarge males), average risk (large males with colon disease), and high risk (large males with rectal disease). Conversion rates among these groups were 5.7%, 11.3%, and 27.8% (p < 0.001). Compared with the low-risk group, ORs for average- and high-risk groups were 2.17 (1.30-3.62, p = 0.004) and 6.38 (3.57-11.4, p < 0.0001).
The study was limited by the lack of external validation.
This predictive model, including body surface area, stratifies patients with different conversion risks and may help to inform patients, to select cases in the early learning curve, and to evaluate the standard of care. However, this prediction rule needs to be externally validated in other samples (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A137).
当需要转换时,腹腔镜方法的优势就会丧失。现有的预测模型未能显示出外部验证。体表面积是最近描述的一个风险因素,这些模型中并未包含。
本研究旨在开发一种包括体表面积的临床规则,以预测接受择期腹腔镜结直肠手术的患者发生中转开腹的可能性。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究。
这项研究在一家大型的三级保健机构进行。
从 2004 年 1 月至 2011 年 8 月期间,从一个前瞻性数据库中确定了 916 例患者(平均年龄 63.9 岁,范围 14-91 岁;53.2%为女性)。
分析年龄、性别、肥胖、疾病部位(结肠与直肠)、疾病类型(肿瘤性与非肿瘤性)、既往手术史以及体表面积与中转开腹率之间的关系。采用逻辑回归分析确定与中转开腹相关的独立变量,并建立简单的临床预测规则。通过自举法对内模进行验证。
中转开腹率为 9.9%(91/916)。直肠疾病、较大的患者体型和男性是与更高的中转开腹风险相关的独立因素(OR 2.28,95%CI 1.47-3.46)、1.88(1.10-3.44)和 1.87(1.04-3.24)。预测规则确定了 3 个风险组:低危组(女性和非大体型男性)、中危组(大体型男性伴结肠疾病)和高危组(大体型男性伴直肠疾病)。这些组别的中转开腹率分别为 5.7%、11.3%和 27.8%(p < 0.001)。与低危组相比,中危组和高危组的比值比分别为 2.17(1.30-3.62,p = 0.004)和 6.38(3.57-11.4,p < 0.0001)。
该研究的局限性在于缺乏外部验证。
该预测模型包含体表面积,可对具有不同中转开腹风险的患者进行分层,有助于告知患者、选择早期学习曲线内的病例,并评估护理标准。但是,这一预测规则需要在其他样本中进行外部验证(见视频,补充数字内容 1,http://links.lww.com/DCR/A137)。