Suppr超能文献

一体式种植系统及其长期稳定性:一项评估研究。

Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research.

作者信息

Javiya Piyush, Rajakumari Kandra, Gorrepati Sravya, Srilakshmi Donka, Mansoor Manawar Ahmad, Abdul Hina Naim, Baig Fawaz Abdul Hamid

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Piparia, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2649-S2651. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_399_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this research was to compare the longstanding stability of single-piece implant systems to typical two-piece systems by analyzing patient records retrospectively.

METHODS

A retrospective examination of patient records from January 2010 to December 2020 was undertaken at the Department of Oral Implantology, University Hospital. The research included dental rehabilitation patients who got single- or two-piece implant systems. Patient demographics, implant features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results were extracted. Implant success rates, stability defined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) utilizing Osstell ISQ®, and peri-implant bone loss evaluated by standardized periapical radiographs at baseline and follow-up visits were the main outcomes.

RESULTS

The research involved 320 patients (160 per cohort). The average patient age was 52.7 years, with 55% men. The mandibular region received 65% of implants, and the maxillary region the rest. Single-piece cohort A had 94.6% implant success, and two-piece cohort B 96.2%. Implant success rates were similar between cohorts ( = 0.412). The mean ISQ scores were 72.4 ± 4.8 in cohort A and 74.8 ± 5.1 in cohort B ( = 0.086). Peri-implant bone loss was 1.8 ± 0.7 mm in cohort A and 1.4 ± 0.6 mm in cohort B ( = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Single-piece implant systems provide a stable and successful alternative to classic two-piece systems. However, patient selection, surgical technique, and monitoring are essential to reduce peri-implant problems and improve clinical results. To improve implant dentistry patient care and evidence-based clinical practice, single-piece and two-piece implant systems' design, biomechanical features, and longstanding performance should be studied.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是通过回顾性分析患者记录,比较一体式种植系统与典型的两件式系统的长期稳定性。

方法

在大学医院口腔种植科对2010年1月至2020年12月的患者记录进行回顾性检查。该研究纳入了接受一体式或两件式种植系统的牙齿修复患者。提取患者人口统计学信息、种植体特征、手术过程和随访结果。主要结果包括种植成功率、使用Osstell ISQ®通过共振频率分析(RFA)定义的稳定性,以及在基线和随访时通过标准化根尖片评估的种植体周围骨丢失。

结果

该研究涉及320名患者(每组160名)。患者平均年龄为52.7岁,男性占55%。下颌区域接受了65%的种植体,其余在上颌区域。一体式A组的种植成功率为94.6%,两件式B组为96.2%。两组之间的种植成功率相似(P = 0.412)。A组的平均ISQ评分为72.4±4.8,B组为74.8±5.1(P = 0.086)。A组种植体周围骨丢失为1.8±0.7mm,B组为1.4±0.6mm(P = 0.031)。

结论

一体式种植系统为传统两件式系统提供了一种稳定且成功的替代方案。然而,患者选择、手术技术和监测对于减少种植体周围问题和改善临床结果至关重要。为了改善种植牙科患者护理和循证临床实践,应研究一体式和两件式种植系统的设计、生物力学特征和长期性能。

相似文献

1
Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research.一体式种植系统及其长期稳定性:一项评估研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2649-S2651. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_399_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
4
Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments.共振频率分析:两种临床仪器比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):308-312. doi: 10.1111/cid.12598. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

8
Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Nov;62(5):567-72. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90081-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验