Wang Yutian, Xie Xiaoyan, Han Ying, Liu Xingyun, Guo Qianyun, Zhang Lei, Ni Xinyi, Liu Hongwei
Department of Oral Medicine, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
J Dent Sci. 2024 Oct;19(4):2179-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) diagnostic criteria did not incorporate radiographic examination while staging SS according to salivary gland imaging and serological autoantibody tests was not discussed. The aim is to study the value of parotid sialography for diagnosing SS, and to initially explore the method of staging SS based on the results of imaging and serological autoantibody tests.
287 patients' clinical records were included. The sensitivity and specificity of parotid sialography in the diagnosis of SS were investigated. SS patients were categorized into early stage (autoantibody positive, imaging does not support SS), active stage (autoantibody positive, imaging supports SS), and quiescent stage (autoantibody negative, imaging supports SS), clinical characteristics of different stages were compared.
The sensitivity of parotid sialography for the diagnosis of SS was 82.6%, the specificity was 71.5%. 10-minute USFR of the patients in the active stage (0.18 ± 0.38 ml/10min) was significantly lower than that of early stage (0.34 ± 0.47 ml/10min) and quiescent stage (0.54 ± 0.52 ml/10min), = 0.010, and the rate of confirmed SS was significantly higher in the active stage (82.9%) than that in the early stage (44.4%) and the quiescent stages (14.8%), < 0.001.
Parotid sialography remains valuable in the diagnosis of SS. Performing imaging and serological autoantibody tests before lip gland biopsy may reduce invasive examinations for patients without significantly increasing the rate of missed diagnosis. According to imaging and serological autoantibody tests, SS can be categorized into early, active, and quiescent stages.
背景/目的:2016年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(ACR/EULAR)原发性干燥综合征(SS)诊断标准未纳入影像学检查,且未讨论根据唾液腺影像学和血清学自身抗体检测对SS进行分期。目的是研究腮腺造影对SS的诊断价值,并初步探索基于影像学和血清学自身抗体检测结果对SS进行分期的方法。
纳入287例患者的临床记录。研究腮腺造影诊断SS的敏感性和特异性。将SS患者分为早期(自身抗体阳性,影像学不支持SS)、活动期(自身抗体阳性,影像学支持SS)和静止期(自身抗体阴性,影像学支持SS),比较不同阶段的临床特征。
腮腺造影诊断SS的敏感性为82.6%,特异性为71.5%。活动期患者的10分钟唾液流率(0.18±0.38 ml/10min)显著低于早期(0.34±0.47 ml/10min)和静止期(0.54±0.52 ml/10min),P = 0.010,活动期SS确诊率(82.9%)显著高于早期(44.4%)和静止期(14.8%),P < 0.001。
腮腺造影对SS的诊断仍有价值。在唇腺活检前进行影像学和血清学自身抗体检测,可减少对患者的侵入性检查,且不会显著增加漏诊率。根据影像学和血清学自身抗体检测,SS可分为早期、活动期和静止期。