Daniels T E, Benn D K
Department of Stomatology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0424, USA.
Adv Dent Res. 1996 Apr;10(1):25-8. doi: 10.1177/08959374960100010301.
Parotid sialography has been used for many years as a means of assessing salivary glands in Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and it is occasionally used as a diagnostic criterion for the salivary component of SS. To assess its diagnostic effectiveness, we reviewed studies in which sialography was applied to patients with SS and control subjects for the purpose of estimating its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity or comparing it with other means of assessing salivary glands. Sialography appears to be diagnostically less sensitive but more specific than salivary flow rate measurement and more sensitive but less specific than labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy. Such calculations are based on the diagnosis of SS established in each study, but the various studies used widely different criteria to establish that diagnosis. Therefore, these calculations are not based on a consistent standard, and comparison between the calculations may be misleading, which underscores the need to develop internationally accepted diagnostic criteria for SS. Studies conducted so far have not shown that parotid sialography is either a sensitive indicator of the salivary component of SS or more closely associated than LSG biopsy with keratoconjunctivitis sicca, the only other component of primary SS with which ultimately to assess diagnostic specificity.
腮腺造影术多年来一直被用作评估干燥综合征(SS)唾液腺的一种方法,偶尔也被用作SS唾液成分的诊断标准。为了评估其诊断有效性,我们回顾了一些研究,这些研究将腮腺造影术应用于SS患者和对照受试者,目的是估计其诊断敏感性和特异性,或与其他评估唾液腺的方法进行比较。腮腺造影术在诊断上似乎比唾液流速测量的敏感性低,但特异性更高,比唇腺(LSG)活检的敏感性高,但特异性更低。这些计算是基于每项研究中确立的SS诊断,但各项研究使用了广泛不同的标准来确立该诊断。因此,这些计算并非基于一致的标准,计算结果之间的比较可能会产生误导,这突出表明需要制定国际公认的SS诊断标准。迄今为止进行的研究尚未表明腮腺造影术是SS唾液成分的敏感指标,也没有表明它比LSG活检与干燥性角结膜炎(原发性SS的唯一其他成分,最终用于评估诊断特异性)的关联更紧密。