Suppr超能文献

乳牙根管治疗中使用旋转、往复和手动锉进行器械预备后剩余牙本质体积的比较评估:一项研究。

Comparative evaluation of the remaining dentin volume following instrumentation with rotary, reciprocating, and hand files during root canal treatment in primary molars: An study.

作者信息

Eren İrem, Sezer Berkant

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2024 Oct;19(4):2126-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The effectiveness of root canal treatments with different file systems in primary teeth is important in terms of clinical practice and the use of file systems that work with different principles in primary tooth pulpectomy is becoming widespread. The amount of remaining dentin in the coronal region of the root is important in terms of the prognosis of the tooth and the long-term success of the treatment in teeth that have undergone root canal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the remaining dentin volume in the coronal part of the root after the use of rotary, reciprocating, and conventional hand files in primary tooth pulpectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 primary molars were divided into three groups. In each group, the preparations were made with three different file types: WaveOne Gold, which works with reciprocating motion; TruNatomy, which works with rotational motion; and conventional hand files. The three-dimensional images were evaluated for remaining dentin volume in the 2-mm coronal part of the root. Group means were compared using one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc analyses were performed with the Tukey test.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of preoperative and postoperative dentin volume ( > 0.05). The mean difference after preparation was observed the most in the WaveOne Gold group and the least in the TruNatomy group. When the mean percentage differences were evaluated, it was observed that statistically significantly more dentin volume was preserved after the preparation with TruNatomy than with WaveOne Gold ( = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

In primary tooth pulpectomy, file systems working with rotational motion can be preferred over file systems working with reciprocating motion in preserving the amount of dentin in the 2-mm coronal part of the root.

摘要

背景/目的:在临床实践中,不同锉系统用于乳牙根管治疗的有效性很重要,并且在乳牙牙髓摘除术中使用基于不同原理工作的锉系统正变得越来越普遍。就牙齿的预后以及接受根管治疗的牙齿治疗的长期成功率而言,牙根冠部剩余牙本质的量很重要。本研究的目的是评估在乳牙牙髓摘除术中使用旋转锉、往复锉和传统手动锉后牙根冠部的剩余牙本质体积。

材料与方法

总共30颗乳牙磨牙被分为三组。在每组中,使用三种不同类型的锉进行预备:采用往复运动的WaveOne Gold锉;采用旋转运动的TruNatomy锉;以及传统手动锉。对三维图像评估牙根2毫米冠部的剩余牙本质体积。使用单因素方差分析比较组均值,并使用Tukey检验进行事后分析。

结果

术前和术后牙本质体积在各组之间无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。预备后平均差异在WaveOne Gold组中观察到最大,在TruNatomy组中观察到最小。当评估平均百分比差异时,观察到使用TruNatomy预备后保留的牙本质体积在统计学上显著多于使用WaveOne Gold(=0.021)。

结论

在乳牙牙髓摘除术中,在保留牙根2毫米冠部牙本质量方面,基于旋转运动的锉系统可能比基于往复运动的锉系统更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4a0/11437276/a6b1cef0b39b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验