Baheti Sandip, Yerramshetty Mounika
Anaesthesiology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 30;16(8):e68173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68173. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Introduction Positioning patients with femur fractures for spinal anesthesia can be challenging due to pain. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), have facilitated patient positioning and improved analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided FICB and PENG for pain management during the positioning of the patient for spinal anesthesia in neck of femur fracture surgeries. Aim of the study Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus pericapsular nerve group block before positioning for spinal anesthesia in the neck of femur fracture surgeries. Materials and methods This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and comparative study was conducted at Dr. DY Patil Hospital, Pune, from November 2022 to January 2024 and included 60 patients with neck and femur fractures scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided FICB (n = 30) or PENG (n = 30) with 0.25% 20 ml of bupivacaine before positioning for spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was to assess the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain before and after the block. Secondary outcomes included assessment of hemodynamic parameters, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results The number of days since fracture in FICB was 2.73±0.98 and in PENG was 3.37±1.9 was comparable with no significant difference between them (p-value =0.11). The mean VAS score after the block was significantly lower in the PENG group compared to the FICB group (3.33±1.73 vs. 4.43±1.3, p = 0.007), indicating better pain relief with PENG. Both techniques were comparable in terms of hemodynamic stability. Patient satisfaction was high and similar in both groups. No significant adverse effects were reported. Conclusion This study observed that the ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block was superior to the fascia iliaca block in providing better analgesia, good patient satisfaction, and hemodynamic stability during positioning for spinal anesthesia.
引言
由于疼痛,为股骨骨折患者进行脊髓麻醉时的体位摆放具有挑战性。区域麻醉技术,如髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)和关节周围神经组阻滞(PENG),有助于患者体位摆放并改善镇痛效果。本研究比较了超声引导下FICB和PENG在股骨颈骨折手术脊髓麻醉患者体位摆放期间的疼痛管理效果。
研究目的
超声引导下的髂筋膜间隙阻滞与关节周围神经组阻滞在股骨颈骨折手术脊髓麻醉体位摆放前的比较。
材料与方法
本前瞻性、随机、单盲、对照研究于2022年11月至2024年1月在浦那的DY帕蒂尔医院进行,纳入60例计划在脊髓麻醉下进行手术的股骨颈骨折患者。患者在脊髓麻醉体位摆放前被随机分配接受超声引导下的FICB(n = 30)或PENG(n = 30),注射0.25% 20 ml布比卡因。主要结局是评估阻滞前后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结局包括血流动力学参数评估、患者满意度和不良反应。
结果
FICB组骨折后的天数为2.73±0.98天,PENG组为3.37±1.9天,二者具有可比性,差异无统计学意义(p值 = 0.11)。与FICB组相比,PENG组阻滞后的平均VAS评分显著更低(3.33±1.73 vs. 4.43±1.3,p = 0.007),表明PENG的镇痛效果更好。两种技术在血流动力学稳定性方面具有可比性。两组患者的满意度都很高且相似。未报告明显的不良反应。
结论
本研究观察到,在脊髓麻醉体位摆放期间,超声引导下的关节周围神经组阻滞在提供更好的镇痛效果、良好的患者满意度和血流动力学稳定性方面优于髂筋膜阻滞。