Angelico Roberta, Bonaccorsi Riani Eliano, De Martin Eleonora, Parente Alessandro, Foguenne Maxime, Sensi Bruno, Rodríguez-Perálvarez Manuel L
Department of Surgical Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Pole of Experimental Surgery and Transplantation - CHEX, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain Brussels, Belgium.
Liver Transpl. 2025 Feb 1;31(2):181-189. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000499. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
The evolving field of liver transplant (LT) oncology calls for tailored immunosuppression protocols to minimize the risk of tumor recurrence. We systematically reviewed the available evidence from inception to May 2023 regarding immunosuppression protocols used in patients undergoing LT for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma, and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to identify common practices and to evaluate their association with oncological outcomes. Studies not involving humans, case reports, and short case series (ie, n < 10) were excluded. Among 3374 screened references, we included 117 studies involving 6797 patients distributed as follows: cholangiocarcinoma (58.1%), NETs (18.8%), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma (7.7%), CRLM (6.8%), mixed neoplasms (6.8%), or others (1.7%). Only 41% of the studies disclosed details of the immunosuppression protocol, and 20.8% of studies provided drug trough concentrations during follow-up. The immunosuppression protocols described were heterogeneous and broadly mirrored routine practices for nontumoral indications. The only exception was CRLM, where tacrolimus minimization-or even withdrawal-in combination with inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORi) were consistently reported. None of the studies evaluated the relationship between the immunosuppression protocol and oncological outcomes. In conclusion, based on low-quality and indirect scientific evidence, patients with tumoral indications for LT should receive the lowest tacrolimus level tolerated under close surveillance. The combination with mTORi titrated to achieve the top therapeutic range of trough concentrations could allow complete tacrolimus withdrawal. This approach may be particularly useful in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and CRLM, in whom tumor recurrence is the main cause of death. We propose a tool for reporting immunosuppression protocols, which could be implemented in future transplant oncology studies.
肝移植(LT)肿瘤学领域的不断发展,需要定制免疫抑制方案以尽量降低肿瘤复发风险。我们系统回顾了从开始到2023年5月期间,有关胆管癌、神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)、肝内皮血管内皮瘤和结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者接受LT时使用的免疫抑制方案的现有证据,以确定常见做法并评估其与肿瘤学结局的关联。不涉及人类的研究、病例报告和短病例系列(即n<10)被排除。在3374篇筛选的参考文献中,我们纳入了117项研究,涉及6797例患者,分布如下:胆管癌(58.1%)、NET(18.8%)、肝内皮血管内皮瘤(7.7%)、CRLM(6.8%)、混合性肿瘤(6.8%)或其他(1.7%)。只有41%的研究披露了免疫抑制方案的细节,20.8%的研究提供了随访期间的药物谷浓度。所描述的免疫抑制方案具有异质性,大致反映了非肿瘤适应证的常规做法。唯一的例外是CRLM,其中一致报告了他克莫司最小化甚至停用,并联合使用雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)抑制剂。没有一项研究评估免疫抑制方案与肿瘤学结局之间的关系。总之,基于低质量和间接的科学证据,有肿瘤适应证的LT患者应在密切监测下接受能耐受的最低他克莫司水平。与mTOR抑制剂联合滴定以达到谷浓度的最高治疗范围,可能允许完全停用他克莫司。这种方法在胆管癌和CRLM患者中可能特别有用,在这些患者中肿瘤复发是主要死因。我们提出了一种报告免疫抑制方案的工具,可在未来的移植肿瘤学研究中实施。