• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院手术量与食管癌围手术期食管切除术费用之间的关系:一项全国性行政索赔数据库研究。

Relationship between hospital surgical volume and the perioperative esophagectomy costs for esophageal cancer: a nationwide administrative claims database study.

作者信息

Sakamoto Takashi, Nishigori Tatsuto, Goto Rei, Kawakami Koji, Nakayama Takeo, Tsunoda Shigeru, Hisamori Shigeo, Hida Koya, Obama Kazutaka

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Graduate School of Business Administration, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2025 Jan;22(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01092-6. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01092-6
PMID:39347879
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have described positive relationships between hospital volume (HV) and clinical outcomes in highly complex procedures, including esophagectomies. Although the centralization of surgery has been considered a possible solution for improving clinical outcomes, the HV impact on perioperative healthcare costs is unknown. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HV and perioperative healthcare costs for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective, nationwide cohort study used Japanese Administrative Claims Database data. Data on esophagectomies performed nationwide in 2015 were extracted. The outcome measure was perioperative healthcare costs per person from the perspective of the insurer. The healthcare costs in outpatient or inpatient settings of any hospital and clinic where patients received treatment were summed up from the month the surgery was performed to 3 months after. Linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk-adjusted effects of the HV category (1-4/5-9/10-14/15-) on perioperative costs.

RESULTS

A total of 5232 patients underwent an esophagectomy at 584 hospitals. The overall perioperative cost was 20.834 billion Japanese yen (JPY). The median perioperative costs per person for each HV category (1-4/5-9/10-14/15-) were 3.728 (709 patients), 3.740 (658 patients), 3.760 (512 patients), and 3.760 (3253 patients) million JPY, respectively (P = 0.676). Multivariate analyses revealed that each HV category had no significant impact on perioperative costs.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the perioperative costs between high- and low-volume centers. Esophageal cancer surgery centralization may be achievable without increasing healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

众多研究描述了医院手术量(HV)与包括食管癌切除术在内的高度复杂手术的临床结局之间的正相关关系。尽管手术集中化被认为是改善临床结局的一种可能解决方案,但HV对围手术期医疗费用的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定接受食管癌切除术患者的HV与围手术期医疗费用之间的关系。

方法

这项回顾性全国队列研究使用了日本行政索赔数据库数据。提取了2015年全国范围内进行的食管癌切除术数据。结局指标是从保险公司角度计算的每人围手术期医疗费用。从手术实施当月至术后3个月,汇总患者接受治疗的任何医院和诊所的门诊或住院环境中的医疗费用。进行线性回归分析以评估HV类别(1 - 4/5 - 9/10 - 14/15 - )对围手术期费用的风险调整效应。

结果

共有5232例患者在584家医院接受了食管癌切除术。围手术期总费用为208.34亿日元。每个HV类别(1 - 4/5 - 9/10 - 14/15 - )的每人围手术期费用中位数分别为372.8万日元(709例患者)、374.0万日元(658例患者)、376.0万日元(512例患者)和376.0万日元(3253例患者)(P = 0.676)。多变量分析显示,每个HV类别对围手术期费用均无显著影响。

结论

高手术量中心和低手术量中心的围手术期费用无显著差异。食管癌手术集中化在不增加医疗费用的情况下可能是可行的。

相似文献

1
Relationship between hospital surgical volume and the perioperative esophagectomy costs for esophageal cancer: a nationwide administrative claims database study.医院手术量与食管癌围手术期食管切除术费用之间的关系:一项全国性行政索赔数据库研究。
Esophagus. 2025 Jan;22(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01092-6. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Implications of Hospital Volume on Costs Following Esophagectomy in the United States.美国食管切除术术后住院费用与医院容量的关系。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1845-1851. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3849-z. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
3
Treatment selection for esophageal cancer: evaluation from a nationwide database.食管癌的治疗选择:来自全国数据库的评估。
Esophagus. 2018 Apr;15(2):109-114. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0605-0. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
4
Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.食管癌手术:美国自发性集中化降低了死亡率且未造成健康差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6339-3. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.食管癌切除术后死亡率受中心手术量的严重影响:全国住院患者样本的回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2491-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5251-9. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.美国部分与全食管切除术趋势和结果的十年分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):450-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1b11d.
7
Antireflux Surgery in the USA: Influence of Surgical Volume on Perioperative Outcomes and Costs-Time for Centralization?美国的抗反流手术:手术量对围手术期结局和成本的影响——是否到了集中化的时候?
World J Surg. 2018 Jul;42(7):2183-2189. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4429-1.
8
Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy.简单的术前风险量表可准确预测恶性肿瘤食管癌切除术后的围手术期死亡率。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/dote.12451.
9
The association between hospital case-volume and postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery: A population-based retrospective cohort study.医院病例量与食管癌手术后术后结果的关联:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Sep;12(18):2487-2493. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14096. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
The Impact of Surgical Volume on Outcomes and Cost in Cleft Repair: A Kids' Inpatient Database Analysis.手术量对唇腭裂修复手术结局及成本的影响:一项儿童住院患者数据库分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;80(4 Suppl 4):S174-S177. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001388.

本文引用的文献

1
The best of both worlds? The economic effects of a hybrid fee-for-service and prospective payment reimbursement system.两全其美?混合按服务收费和按预期支付报销系统的经济影响。
Health Econ. 2021 Mar;30(3):505-524. doi: 10.1002/hec.4205. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
History and Profile of Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC): Development of a Real Data Collection System for Acute Inpatient Care in Japan.诊断程序组合(DPC)的历史和概况:日本急性住院护理真实数据采集系统的开发。
J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 5;31(1):1-11. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200288. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
3
Impact of certification status of the institute and surgeon on short-term outcomes after surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer: evaluation using data on 16,752 patients from the National Clinical Database in Japan.
机构和外科医生认证状况对胸段食管癌手术后短期结局的影响:来自日本国家临床数据库 16752 例患者数据的评估。
Esophagus. 2020 Jan;17(1):41-49. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00694-9. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Toward a Consensus on Centralization in Surgery.关于手术集中化的共识。
Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):712-724. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002965.
5
Implications of Hospital Volume on Costs Following Esophagectomy in the United States.美国食管切除术术后住院费用与医院容量的关系。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1845-1851. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3849-z. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Excess Cost and Predictive Factors of Esophagectomy Complications in the SEER-Medicare Database.SEER-Medicare 数据库中食管切除术并发症的超额成本及预测因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Nov;106(5):1484-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
7
Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: Report of National Clinical database 2011-2016.日本胃肠外科手术的手术结果:2011 - 2016年国家临床数据库报告
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Nov 23;2(1):37-54. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12052. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
Geographic Access to Cancer Treatment in Japan: Results From a Combined Dataset of the Patient Survey and the Survey of Medical Institutions in 2011.日本癌症治疗的地理可达性:2011 年患者调查和医疗机构调查综合数据集的结果。
J Epidemiol. 2018 Nov 5;28(11):470-475. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170051. Epub 2018 May 12.
9
The first report of Japanese antimicrobial use measured by national database based on health insurance claims data (2011-2013): comparison with sales data, and trend analysis stratified by antimicrobial category and age group.基于健康保险索赔数据的全国数据库衡量的日本抗菌药物使用的首次报告(2011-2013 年):与销售数据的比较,以及按抗菌药物类别和年龄组分层的趋势分析。
Infection. 2018 Apr;46(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1097-x. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Can postoperative process of care utilization or complication rates explain the volume-cost relationship for cancer surgery?术后护理利用过程或并发症发生率能否解释癌症手术的量-成本关系?
Surgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):418-428. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Apr 21.