• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单的术前风险量表可准确预测恶性肿瘤食管癌切除术后的围手术期死亡率。

Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy.

作者信息

Fuchs H F, Harnsberger C R, Broderick R C, Chang D C, Sandler B J, Jacobsen G R, Bouvet M, Horgan S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA.

Department of General Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/dote.12451.

DOI:10.1111/dote.12451
PMID:26727414
Abstract

Surgery remains one of the major treatment options available to patients with esophageal cancer, with high mortality in certain cohorts. The aim of this study was to develop a simple preoperative risk scale based on patient factors, hospital factors, and tumor pathology to predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to create the risk scale. Patients who underwent open or laparoscopic transhiatal and transthoracic esophageal resection were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition codes. Patients <18 years and those with peritoneal disease were excluded. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to define a predictive model of perioperative mortality and to create a simple risk scale. From 1998 to 2011, a total of 23 751 patients underwent esophagectomy. The observed overall perioperative mortality rate for this cohort was 7.7%. Minimally invasive techniques, and operations performed in higher volume centers were protective, whereas increasing age, comorbidities and diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma were independent predictors of mortality. Based on this population, a risk scale from 0-16 was created. The calibration revealed a good agreement between the observed and risk scale-predicted probabilities. A set of sensitivity/specificity analyses was then performed to define normal (score 0-7) and high risk (score 8-16) patients for clinical practice. Mortality in patients with a score of 0-7 ranged from 1.3-7.6%, compared with 10.5-34.5% in patients with a score of 8-16. This simple preoperative risk scale may accurately predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy and can be used as a clinical tool for preoperative counseling.

摘要

手术仍然是食管癌患者可采用的主要治疗选择之一,在某些队列中死亡率较高。本研究的目的是基于患者因素、医院因素和肿瘤病理制定一个简单的术前风险量表,以预测恶性肿瘤食管切除术后围手术期死亡风险。使用全国住院患者样本数据库创建风险量表。通过国际疾病分类第9版编码识别接受开放或腹腔镜经裂孔和经胸食管切除术的患者。排除年龄<18岁和患有腹膜疾病的患者。采用多因素逻辑回归来定义围手术期死亡的预测模型并创建一个简单的风险量表。1998年至2011年,共有23751例患者接受了食管切除术。该队列观察到的总体围手术期死亡率为7.7%。微创技术以及在手术量较大的中心进行的手术具有保护作用,而年龄增加、合并症和鳞状细胞癌诊断是死亡的独立预测因素。基于该人群,创建了一个0至16的风险量表。校准显示观察到的概率与风险量表预测的概率之间具有良好的一致性。然后进行了一组敏感性/特异性分析,以确定临床实践中的正常(评分0至7)和高风险(评分8至16)患者。评分0至7的患者死亡率为1.3%至7.6%,而评分8至16的患者死亡率为10.5%至34.5%。这个简单的术前风险量表可以准确预测恶性肿瘤食管切除术后围手术期死亡风险,并可作为术前咨询的临床工具。

相似文献

1
Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy.简单的术前风险量表可准确预测恶性肿瘤食管癌切除术后的围手术期死亡率。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/dote.12451.
2
Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.食管癌切除术后死亡率受中心手术量的严重影响:全国住院患者样本的回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2491-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5251-9. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
External validation of a risk score in the prediction of the mortality after esophagectomy for cancer.癌症食管癌切除术后死亡率预测风险评分的外部验证
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12447.
4
Transthoracic approach is associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation after esophageal resection.经胸入路与食管切除术后房颤发生率增加有关。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3908-9. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
5
Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival.在发病率、死亡率和生存率方面,开放性经胸或经裂孔食管切除术与微创食管切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1681-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0009-4. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
6
Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.使用列线图对癌症食管癌切除术后并发症的发生及严重程度进行术前预测。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jun;85(6):1938-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.014.
7
A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.美国部分与全食管切除术趋势和结果的十年分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):450-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1b11d.
8
Pattern of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Resection According to Center Volume: Results from a Large European Multicenter Study.根据中心手术量分析食管癌切除术后的死亡率模式:一项大型欧洲多中心研究的结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2615-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4310-5. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
9
Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.集中化时代中等规模机构食管癌手术的围手术期结局
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1477-1. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:来自胸外科医师协会国家数据库的早期手术结果比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of mortality risk scores after esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后死亡风险评分的验证
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 28;151(2):51. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-06074-w.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of CT-based Node-RADS for Esophageal Cancer.基于CT的食管癌淋巴结影像报告和数据系统(Node-RADS)的诊断准确性与可靠性
In Vivo. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):353-359. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13835.
3
Mapping the Lymphatic Drainage Pattern of Esophageal Cancer with Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging during Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAMIE)-First Results of the Prospective ESOMAP Feasibility Trial.
在机器人辅助微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术(RAMIE)中利用近红外荧光成像绘制食管癌淋巴引流模式——前瞻性ESOMAP可行性试验的初步结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;15(8):2247. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082247.
4
Predicting mortality in patients with anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: development of a prediction model using data from the TENTACLE-Esophagus study.预测食管切除术后吻合口漏患者的死亡率:使用 TENTACLE-Esophagus 研究的数据开发预测模型。
Dis Esophagus. 2023 Apr 29;36(5). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac081.
5
Surgical Therapy of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Current Standards and Future Perspectives.食管腺癌的外科治疗——当前标准与未来展望
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 21;13(22):5834. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225834.
6
Gastrointestinal function testing model using a new laryngopharyngeal pH probe (Restech) in patients after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.使用新型喉咽pH探头(Restech)对Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后患者进行胃肠功能测试模型
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):612-624. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.612.
7
Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center.食管癌手术治疗中圆形吻合器的尺寸会影响吻合口漏发生率吗?欧洲一家高容量中心的4年经验。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 22;12(11):3474. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113474.
8
Modular step-up approach to robot-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy-experience of a German high volume center.机器人辅助经胸食管癌切除术的模块化逐步升级方法——德国一家高手术量中心的经验
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug 23;4:62. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.07.04. eCollection 2019.
9
Reduction of oxidative stress a key for enhanced postoperative recovery with fewer complications in esophageal surgery patients: Randomized control trial to investigate therapeutic impact of anesthesia management and usefulness of simple blood test for prediction of high-risk patients.降低氧化应激是食管癌手术患者术后恢复加快且并发症减少的关键:一项随机对照试验,旨在研究麻醉管理的治疗效果以及简单血液检测对预测高危患者的有用性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(47):e12845. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012845.
10
[Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgical management of upper gastrointestinal cancer].[上消化道癌的微创与机器人辅助手术治疗]
Chirurg. 2017 Dec;88(12):1017-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0522-0.