Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Mar;23(3):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
To investigate whether an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated decision tool, combined with supportive interventions, results in more appropriate antibiotic prescribing in nursing home (NH) residents with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI), without negative consequences for residents.
Cluster randomized controlled trial with NHs as the randomization unit; intervention group NHs received the EHR-integrated decision tool and supportive interventions, and control group NHs provided care as usual.
212 residents with suspected UTI, from 16 NHs in the Netherlands.
Physicians collected data at index consultation (ie, UTI suspicion) and during a 21-day follow-up period (March 2019-March 2020). Overall antibiotic prescribing data at NH level, 12 months prior to and during the study, was derived from the electronic prescribing system. The primary study outcome was the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions for suspected UTI that was appropriate, at index consultation. Secondary study outcomes included changes in treatment decision, complications, UTI-related hospitalization, and mortality during follow-up; and pre-post study changes in antibiotic prescribing at the NH level.
295 suspected UTIs were included (intervention group: 189; control group: 106). The between-group difference in appropriate antibiotic prescribing was 13% [intervention group: 62%, control group: 49%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% CI 0.57-3.62]. In both groups, complications (2% vs 3%), UTI-related hospitalization (2% vs 1%), and possible UTI-related mortality (2% vs 2%) were rare. The pre-post study difference in antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 resident-care days was -0.95 in the intervention group NHs and -0.05 in the control group NHs (P = .02).
Although appropriate antibiotic prescribing improved in the intervention group, this does not provide sufficient evidence for our multidisciplinary intervention. Despite this inconclusive result, our intervention could potentially still be effective, because we established a large reduction in the number of antibiotic prescriptions in the intervention group.
研究电子病历(EHR)整合决策工具结合支持性干预措施是否会导致疗养院(NH)中疑似尿路感染(UTI)的居民更合理地开具抗生素,同时不会对居民产生负面影响。
以 NH 为随机单位的聚类随机对照试验;干预组 NH 接受 EHR 整合决策工具和支持性干预措施,对照组 NH 提供常规护理。
来自荷兰 16 家 NH 的 212 名疑似 UTI 居民。
医生在索引咨询(即 UTI 疑似)和 21 天随访期间(2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月)收集数据。NH 层面的总体抗生素使用数据,在研究之前和研究期间,来自电子处方系统。主要研究结果是索引咨询时疑似 UTI 的抗生素处方的适当比例。次要研究结果包括治疗决策的变化、并发症、与 UTI 相关的住院治疗和随访期间的死亡率;以及 NH 层面抗生素使用的研究前后变化。
纳入了 295 例疑似 UTI(干预组:189 例;对照组:106 例)。两组之间适当抗生素使用的差异为 13%[干预组:62%,对照组:49%;调整后的优势比(OR)1.43,95%置信区间(CI)0.57-3.62]。在两组中,并发症(2%比 3%)、与 UTI 相关的住院治疗(2%比 1%)和可能与 UTI 相关的死亡率(2%比 2%)都很少见。干预组 NH 每 1000 名居民护理日的抗生素处方数的研究前后差异为-0.95,对照组 NH 为-0.05(P =.02)。
尽管干预组的适当抗生素使用有所改善,但这并不能为我们的多学科干预提供充分的证据。尽管结果不确定,但我们的干预措施仍有可能有效,因为我们在干预组中建立了大量减少抗生素处方数量。