Soulard Margaux, Galicier Lionel, Mahlaoui Nizar, Fieschi Claire, Deshayes Samuel, Gobert Delphine, Gourguechon Clément, Henique Hélène, Humbert Sebastien, Lacout Carole, Le Calloch Ronan, Michel Marc, Piel-Julian Marie-Lea, Viallard Jean François, Lescoat Alain, Godeau Bertrand, Perlat Antoinette
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Department of Clinical Immunology, and Immunodeficiencies Center, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Blood Adv. 2024 Dec 24;8(24):6171-6182. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014370.
Predominantly antibody deficiencies have an estimated prevalence of >1 in 25 000. Their classical phenotype entails the association of autoimmune manifestations with increased susceptibility to infections. Up to 8% of these patients ultimately develop immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Reducing the risk for infections and considering nonimmunosuppressive treatments, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), are important considerations for these patients. This nationwide retrospective case series assessed the outcomes and safety of TPO-RAs as treatment for ITP in adults diagnosed with predominantly antibody deficiencies. Response and complete response to treatment were defined as platelet count reaching 30 × 109/L and 100 × 109/L, respectively. We analyzed data from 28 patients. The median follow-up time after introduction of the first TPO-RAs was 33 months (range, 2 weeks to 10.6 years). After 6 weeks of follow-up, response was achieved in 24 of the 28 patients (85.7%), and among those, 21 patients (75%) displayed a complete response. At the last available follow-up visit, only 7 patients (25%) needed second-line therapies for ITP, and among those, only 5 patients (17.9%) received immunosuppressants. Only 3 patients (10.7%) reported laboratory-confirmed hepatobiliary adverse events of light or mild severity and 3 patients (10.7%) reported thrombotic events. In conclusion, TPO-RAs seemed to be an effective and safe option of treatment in these case series. Our results suggest that eltrombopag or romiplostim should be considered as second-line therapy for ITP related to predominantly antibody deficiencies.
主要抗体缺陷的估计患病率超过1/25000。其典型表型包括自身免疫表现与感染易感性增加相关。这些患者中高达8%最终会发展为免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)。降低感染风险并考虑非免疫抑制治疗,如血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RAs),是这些患者的重要考虑因素。本全国性回顾性病例系列评估了TPO-RAs作为治疗主要诊断为抗体缺陷的成人ITP的疗效和安全性。治疗反应和完全缓解分别定义为血小板计数达到30×10⁹/L和100×10⁹/L。我们分析了28例患者的数据。首次使用TPO-RAs后的中位随访时间为33个月(范围为2周至10.6年)。随访6周后,28例患者中有24例(85.7%)有反应,其中21例(75%)完全缓解。在最后一次可获得的随访时,只有7例患者(25%)需要ITP二线治疗,其中只有5例患者(17.9%)接受了免疫抑制剂治疗。只有3例患者(10.7%)报告了实验室确认的轻度或中度肝胆不良事件,3例患者(10.7%)报告了血栓形成事件。总之,在这些病例系列中,TPO-RAs似乎是一种有效且安全的治疗选择。我们的结果表明,艾曲泊帕或罗米司亭应被视为主要与抗体缺陷相关的ITP的二线治疗药物。