Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.
Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Anticancer Res. 2024 Oct;44(10):4585-4592. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17288.
BACKGROUND/AIM: This study compared the initial outcomes of gas-insufflation one-step single-port transaxillary (GOSTA) robotic thyroidectomy with traditional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer at a single institution.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 77 patients who underwent thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer from January to June 2024. Exclusion criteria included benign nodules, Graves' disease, and previous thyroid surgeries. Two surgeons performed the procedures, with one having no prior robotic surgery experience.
Of the 77 patients, 48 underwent open thyroidectomy and 29 underwent GOSTA thyroidectomy. The GOSTA group had a significantly lower mean age (40.1 vs. 47.6 years, p=0.002) and a higher proportion of female patients (p=0.040). The open group patients had more harvested lymph nodes than the GOSTA group patients (7.9 vs. 2.4, p<0.001). The GOSTA group patients had longer operation time (156.4 vs. 80.6 min, p<0.001), and had extended hospital stay than the open group patients (5.9 vs. 3.4 days, p<0.001). Complication rates were similar between the groups.
GOSTA robotic thyroidectomy provides comparable safety and effectiveness to open thyroidectomy, with improved cosmetic outcomes despite longer operation times and hospital stays. This technique is feasible for surgeons without prior robotic experience, offering a viable alternative for patients prioritizing cosmetic results.
背景/目的:本研究比较了单中心行充气式经腋窝入路单孔一步法(GOSTA)机器人甲状腺切除术与传统开放性甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌的初始结果。
对 2024 年 1 月至 6 月期间因分化型甲状腺癌接受甲状腺切除术的 77 例患者进行回顾性分析。排除标准包括良性结节、格雷夫斯病和既往甲状腺手术史。两位外科医生实施了这些手术,其中一位没有机器人手术经验。
77 例患者中,48 例行开放性甲状腺切除术,29 例行 GOSTA 甲状腺切除术。GOSTA 组的平均年龄明显较低(40.1 岁比 47.6 岁,p=0.002),女性患者比例较高(p=0.040)。开放性组患者的淋巴结清扫数目多于 GOSTA 组(7.9 比 2.4,p<0.001)。GOSTA 组患者的手术时间较长(156.4 比 80.6 分钟,p<0.001),住院时间也长于开放性组(5.9 比 3.4 天,p<0.001)。两组并发症发生率相似。
GOSTA 机器人甲状腺切除术与开放性甲状腺切除术相比具有相当的安全性和有效性,尽管手术时间和住院时间延长,但美容效果改善。对于没有机器人经验的外科医生来说,该技术是可行的,为优先考虑美容效果的患者提供了一种可行的替代方案。