• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: How to Improve Fusion Rate?双孔道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:如何提高融合率?
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):582-588. doi: 10.14444/8648.
2
Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Review of Current Research.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的双门内镜技术:当前研究综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(suppl 3):S84-S92. doi: 10.14444/8167.
3
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Cages.使用可扩张椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 May 15;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00062. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术(ULIF)与内镜经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(Endo-TLIF)治疗伴椎间盘突出的腰椎管狭窄症:回顾性分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 29;25(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07287-3.
5
Technique of Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.双孔内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术技术
Neurospine. 2020 Jul;17(Suppl 1):S129-S137. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040178.089. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
6
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.经皮双侧双通道内镜技术与传统显微镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术的对比研究
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF):视频技术指南
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Oct 4;13(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00065. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
8
Comparison of efficacy and safety between unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus uniportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与单通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08146-x.
9
Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage for degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis.使用大型椎间融合器的双孔道内镜经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症伴狭窄
Neurosurg Focus Video. 2024 Apr 1;10(2):V15. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.FOCVID23231. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的Meta 分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 21;25(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08046-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using the multi-layer bone grafting technique: a retrospective study from Vietnam.采用多层骨移植技术的双孔通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的有效性:一项来自越南的回顾性研究。
Asian Spine J. 2025 Apr;19(2):228-241. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0522. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a large polyetheretherketone cage: preliminary results.使用大型聚醚醚酮椎间融合器的双门内镜下腰椎椎间融合术:初步结果
Asian Spine J. 2025 Apr;19(2):252-258. doi: 10.31616/asj.2025.0010. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较有器械辅助的和单纯的侧方腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07214-6.
2
Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.腰椎椎间融合器材料与设计的创新进展:一篇全面的叙述性综述
Asian Spine J. 2024 Jun;18(3):444-457. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0407. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.3D打印多孔钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼用于腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.111. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
4
Treatment Concept and Technical Considerations of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症双孔道内镜脊柱手术的治疗理念与技术要点
Asian Spine J. 2024 Apr;18(2):301-323. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0409. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
In Vivo Comparison of Positive Microbial Culture by Wound Irrigation Methods: Biportal Endoscopic Versus Open Microscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.经皮冲洗法与开放显微镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术行阳性微生物培养的体内比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Jul 1;49(13):941-949. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004812. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
6
Biportal endoscopic extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium cage with large footprints: technical note and preliminary results.双通道内镜下经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用 3D 打印多孔钛笼大接触面积:技术要点及初步结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Jun;165(6):1435-1443. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05605-7. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Advances in bone regeneration with growth factors for spinal fusion: A literature review.用于脊柱融合的生长因子在骨再生方面的进展:文献综述。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Dec 17;13:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100193. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.3D 打印钛笼无需骨移植即可优于动物模型中使用自体移植物的 PEEK 笼。
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):1016-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
9
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.经皮双侧双通道内镜技术与传统显微镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术的对比研究
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
10
Technique of Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.双孔内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术技术
Neurospine. 2020 Jul;17(Suppl 1):S129-S137. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040178.089. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

双孔道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:如何提高融合率?

Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: How to Improve Fusion Rate?

作者信息

Park Hyun-Jin, Shin John I, You Ki-Han, Yang Jason I, Kim Nathan, Kim Yong H, Kang Min-Seok, Park Sang-Min

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center/Jersey City Medical Center-RWJBarnabas Health, Jersey, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):582-588. doi: 10.14444/8648.

DOI:10.14444/8648
PMID:39349004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11616434/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical technique for treating degenerative lumbar spine conditions. It offers advantages such as reduced soft tissue trauma and lower infection rates, but certain technical aspects may be challenging. The current study aims to identify strategies to enhance the fusion rate in BE-TLIF by addressing these specific challenges.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on techniques to improve fusion rates in BE-TLIF.

RESULTS

The review suggests that lateral-based portals supplemented with medial portals allowed for safe insertion of interbody cages with large footprint. Direct visualization of the disc space with a 30° endoscope assisted with better disc space preparation. Facetectomies performed with osteotomes, rather than burrs, ensured maximum retrieval of autologous bone graft. Utilizing bone morphogenetic proteins with sustained release carriers such as hydroxyapatite can be useful to increase fusion rates of BE-TLIF.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, the current literature is the first comprehensive review of strategies to enhance fusion rates in BE-TLIF. The proposed techniques and biological adjuncts are effective means to address key challenges associated with the procedure, and such strategies would potentially shorten the learning curve and improve clinical outcomes. Further clinical studies are required to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings provide practical solutions to overcome common challenges in BE-TLIF. The suggested techniques would reduce the incidence of pseudarthrosis, improve patient outcomes, and ultimately offer a safer and more reliable option for lumbar interbody fusion patients.

摘要

背景

双孔道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(BE-TLIF)是一种用于治疗退行性腰椎疾病的微创手术技术。它具有软组织创伤小和感染率低等优点,但某些技术方面可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在通过应对这些特定挑战来确定提高BE-TLIF融合率的策略。

方法

对提高BE-TLIF融合率的技术进行了文献综述。

结果

综述表明,外侧入路辅以内侧入路可安全植入大尺寸椎间融合器。使用30°内镜直接观察椎间盘间隙有助于更好地准备椎间盘间隙。用骨刀而非磨钻进行椎板切除可确保最大限度地获取自体骨移植材料。使用载有骨形态发生蛋白的缓释载体(如羟基磷灰石)有助于提高BE-TLIF的融合率。

结论

据我们所知,当前文献是对提高BE-TLIF融合率策略的首次全面综述。所提出的技术和生物辅助手段是应对与该手术相关的关键挑战的有效方法,这些策略可能会缩短学习曲线并改善临床结果。需要进一步的临床研究来验证这些发现并建立标准化方案。

临床意义

这些发现为克服BE-TLIF中的常见挑战提供了切实可行的解决方案。所建议的技术将降低假关节形成的发生率,改善患者预后,并最终为腰椎椎间融合患者提供更安全、更可靠的选择。