Menacho-Roman Miriam, Fabregate-Fuente Martin, Caja-Guayerbas Laura, Jiménez-Sánchez Sergio, Soto Javier, Arribas-Gómez Ignacio
Clinical Biochemistry Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
J Ren Nutr. 2024 Sep 29. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2024.09.004.
The measurement of urinary sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating urinary sodium excretion.
To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24 h uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.
A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cutoff value of 130 mmol/24 h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.
The model was well calibrated (slope [95% confidence interval] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24 h uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24 h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 P < .0001), accuracy (the percentage of estimated 24 h uNa results within 30% deviation of measured 24 h uNa): 56.8%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.
Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95% confidence interval makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.
尿钠排泄量的测量可为个体钠平衡提供有价值的信息,并有助于多种医疗状况的管理。然而,收集24小时尿样容易出现误差。即时尿钠(uNa)测量是估计尿钠排泄量的一种可靠替代方法,可替代24小时尿样收集。
评估在医院门诊就诊的成年患者中,能否通过即时样本估计24小时尿钠排泄量(24 h uNa)。
在我院进行了一项包含一个开发队列(284例患者)和一个验证队列(229例患者)的横断面研究。构建了一个多变量线性回归模型,并与以前的模型进行比较。进行了一致性分析,并将每位患者根据预设的uNa临界值130 mmol/24 h正确分类的能力进行比较,通过C统计量进行评估。
该模型校准良好(内部验证中的斜率[95%置信区间]:0.965[0.947 - 0.987],显示出良好的区分度,并且在外部验证队列中表现稳健(斜率:0.811[0.675 - 0.946])。NaRYC测量的和估计的24 h uNa之间的平均偏差为24.85 mmol/24 h[17.06 - 32.63]。与其他七个方程相比,NaRYC的Pearson系数值最高(0.613,P <.0001),准确度(估计的24 h uNa结果在测量的24 h uNa偏差30%以内的百分比):56.8%,以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积:0.822[0.766 - 0.869]。
虽然结果的平均偏差相当可接受,但在95%置信区间内观察到的变异性使得不建议一般使用即时样本替代24小时尿液来估计单个受试者的尿钠总排泄量。