• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首发精神分裂症谱系障碍中阳性和阴性症状量表的维度结构:来自OPTiMiSE试验的探索性图分析

The dimensional structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an Exploratory Graph Analysis from the OPTiMiSE trial.

作者信息

Dal Santo Francesco, García-Portilla María Paz, Fernández-Egea Emilio, González-Blanco Leticia, Sáiz Pilar A, Giordano Giulia Maria, Galderisi Silvana, Bobes Julio

机构信息

Área de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturias (SESPA), Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Sep 30;10(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00499-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41537-024-00499-5
PMID:39349504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11442741/
Abstract

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is the most widely used rating scale to assess psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and other primary psychoses. However, a definitive consensus regarding its dimensional structure remains elusive. The present work aims to determine the number of dimensions of the scale through a network analysis approach in a sample of individuals experiencing first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder (FE-SSD) with minimal or no prior exposure to antipsychotic treatment. Baseline data of 446 participants (age 25.96 ± 5.99 years, 70% males) enrolled in the OPTiMiSE trial were analysed. Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) was conducted to evaluate the dimensionality of the PANSS, and a bootstrap approach (bootEGA) was employed to assess model stability. The analysis was replicated, excluding unstable items with stability values below 0.75, until a stable model was achieved. The analysis of the 30 items of the PANSS revealed inadequate structural consistency, resulting in the exclusion of 9 unstable items. The final model comprised 21 symptoms distributed across four communities (Positive, Cognitive/Disorganised, Excited/Aggressive and Negative) but lacked a depressive domain. In conclusion, we propose a concise version of the PANSS, incorporating 21 items, to better assess the core symptoms of the first episode of SSD. This revised version provides clinicians with a robust psychometric tool with reduced administration time, but the complementary administration of a dedicated instrument for evaluating affective symptoms is advisable.

摘要

阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)是评估精神分裂症及其他原发性精神病患者精神症状时使用最广泛的评定量表。然而,关于其维度结构的确切共识仍未达成。本研究旨在通过网络分析方法,在首次发作的精神分裂症谱系障碍(FE-SSD)且极少或未曾接受过抗精神病药物治疗的个体样本中,确定该量表的维度数量。对参与OPTiMiSE试验的446名参与者(年龄25.96±5.99岁,70%为男性)的基线数据进行了分析。采用探索性图分析(EGA)评估PANSS的维度,并采用自举法(bootEGA)评估模型稳定性。重复该分析,排除稳定性值低于0.75的不稳定项目,直至获得稳定模型。对PANSS的30个项目进行分析,结果显示结构一致性不足,最终排除了9个不稳定项目。最终模型包含分布在四个群落(阳性、认知/紊乱、兴奋/攻击和阴性)中的21种症状,但缺少抑郁领域。总之,我们提出了一个包含21个项目的PANSS简明版本,以更好地评估SSD首次发作的核心症状。这个修订版本为临床医生提供了一个强大的心理测量工具,同时减少了施测时间,但建议辅以专门用于评估情感症状的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/9702170a3fca/41537_2024_499_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/f77c64ff30d5/41537_2024_499_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/4cea03e12e6d/41537_2024_499_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/4de6a39b3a09/41537_2024_499_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/9702170a3fca/41537_2024_499_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/f77c64ff30d5/41537_2024_499_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/4cea03e12e6d/41537_2024_499_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/4de6a39b3a09/41537_2024_499_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/11442741/9702170a3fca/41537_2024_499_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The dimensional structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an Exploratory Graph Analysis from the OPTiMiSE trial.首发精神分裂症谱系障碍中阳性和阴性症状量表的维度结构:来自OPTiMiSE试验的探索性图分析
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Sep 30;10(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00499-5.
2
The network and dimensionality structure of affective psychoses: an exploratory graph analysis approach.情感性精神病的网络和维度结构:探索性图分析方法。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Negative symptom dimensions in first episode psychosis: Is there a difference between schizophrenia and non-schizophrenia spectrum disorders?首发精神病患者的阴性症状维度:精神分裂症与非精神分裂症谱系障碍是否存在差异?
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;15(6):1513-1521. doi: 10.1111/eip.13088. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
5
[A four-dimensional model of chronic schizophrenia based on the factorial structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). A study of a group of 153 chronic schizophrenic patients and comparison with the factorial structure of the BPRS].基于阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)因子结构的慢性精神分裂症四维模型。对153例慢性精神分裂症患者的研究及与简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)因子结构的比较
Encephale. 1997 Jan-Feb;23(1):10-8.
6
Use of Exploratory Graph Analysis in Inspecting the Dimensionality of the Revised University of California Los Angeles (R-UCLA) Loneliness Scale Among Older Adults.探索性图分析在检验老年人修订版加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(R-UCLA)孤独量表维度中的应用。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;16(1):15-20. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20230104-03. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
7
Rasch analysis of the PANSS negative subscale and exploration of negative symptom trajectories in first-episode schizophrenia - data from the OPTiMiSE trial.PANSS 阴性量表的 Rasch 分析及首发精神分裂症阴性症状轨迹的探索——来自 OPTiMiSE 试验的数据。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:112970. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112970. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
8
Cognitive-behavioural therapy for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: the FOCUS RCT.认知行为疗法治疗氯氮平抵抗性精神分裂症:FOCUS RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Feb;23(7):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta23070.
9
Depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder.精神分裂症和精神分裂症样障碍患者的抑郁和焦虑症状。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;60(11):747-51. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n1105.
10
Negative symptom configuration within and outside schizophrenia spectrum disorders: results from the "Parma Early Psychosis" program.精神分裂症谱系障碍内外的阴性症状结构:来自“帕尔马早期精神病”项目的结果。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113519. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113519. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory network analysis to investigate schizotypy's structure using the 'Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale' and 'Oxford-Liverpool Inventory' in a healthy cohort.一项探索性网络分析,旨在使用“多维分裂型特质量表”和“牛津-利物浦库存量表”对一个健康队列中分裂型特质的结构进行研究。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Feb 28;11(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00584-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.在验证性因子分析中评估测量模型的模型拟合度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Feb;84(1):123-144. doi: 10.1177/00131644231163813. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
2
The dynamic paradigm of illness in psychopathology.精神病理学中疾病的动态范式。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):163-164. doi: 10.1002/wps.21175.
3
Centrality statistics of symptom networks of schizophrenia: a systematic review.精神分裂症症状网络的中心度统计:系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2024 Apr;54(6):1061-1073. doi: 10.1017/S003329172300363X. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.欧洲精神病学协会关于精神分裂症认知障碍评估的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 5;65(1):e58. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2316.
5
Searching for bridges between psychopathology and real-world functioning in first-episode psychosis: A network analysis from the OPTiMiSE trial.首发精神病患者精神病理学与现实功能间关联的探索:来自 OPTiMiSE 试验的网络分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 10;65(1):e33. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.25.
6
Is it possible to stage schizophrenia? A systematic review.精神分裂症能否分期?系统评价。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 May 11;12(1):197. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01889-y.
7
Disorder of Selfhood in Schizophrenia: A Symptom or a Gestalt?精神分裂症中的自我认同障碍:是一种症状还是一种整体表现?
Psychopathology. 2022;55(5):273-281. doi: 10.1159/000524100. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
8
Symptom Structure in Schizophrenia: Implications of Latent Variable Modeling vs Network Analysis.精神分裂症的症状结构:潜在变量建模与网络分析的启示。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 May 7;48(3):538-543. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac020.
9
A Comparison of Personal Recovery in Adults with Early Psychosis and Prolonged Schizophrenia.成人早期精神病与长期精神分裂症患者的个人康复比较。
Psicothema. 2022 Feb;34(1):35-40. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2021.142.
10
Structure and stability of symptoms in first episode psychosis: a longitudinal network approach.首发精神病中症状的结构和稳定性:纵向网络方法。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 6;11(1):567. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01687-y.