Tian Jiajie, Wang Zerong, Xiao Yi
China Table Tennis College, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73829-3.
The diameter and weight of different brands of table tennis ball will affect the ball's elasticity and stroke. The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference of the dynamic elasticity and stroke effect between the two brands of new plastic ball. A self-made experiment was designed to test the dynamic elasticity characteristics of DHS D40 + and Nittaku 40+. Table tennis players (N = 18) were randomly selected from the China Table Tennis College (M = 15.16 ± 2.41; M = 1.59 ± 0.32 m; M = 45.72 ± 5.17 kg). Each participant was righthand shake-hands grip. A speedometer was used to record the ball speed and a high-speed camera was used to measure the spin speed. Data normality was verified by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The independent t-test was conducted to assess the differences of the dynamic elasticity and stroke effect between the two types of plastic ball. Results showed that the rebound speed and decrement rate of DHS D40 + and Nittaku 40 + both increased with the increased falling speed, respectively. When falling at high speed, there was a significant difference of dynamic elasticity between DHS D40 + and Nittaku 40+ (p < 0.01). There was also a significant difference in the ball speed and spin speed between the two types of new material seamed plastic ball during the backhand backspin stroke (p = 0.041, p = 0.022, respectively), and the ball speed and spin speed of DHS D40 + were higher than that of Nittaku 40 + ball. Compared with the DHS D40+, the Nittaku 40 + has a faster rebound speed, higher rebound height, and better dynamic elasticity. Therefore, under same striking conditions, when hitting the Nittaku 40 + ball, players need to increase the swing distance and hit the ball with more strength to improve the ball speed and rotation speed; increase the spin and decrease the ball's rebound height of the serve.
不同品牌乒乓球的直径和重量会影响球的弹性和击球效果。本研究旨在分析两种品牌新塑料球的动态弹性和击球效果差异。设计了一个自制实验来测试红双喜D40+和尼塔库40+的动态弹性特征。从中国乒乓球学院随机选取乒乓球运动员(N = 18)(平均年龄M = 15.16 ± 2.41岁;平均身高M = 1.59 ± 0.32米;平均体重M = 45.72 ± 5.17千克)。每位参与者均采用右手直握拍。使用测速仪记录球速,使用高速摄像机测量旋转速度。通过柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验验证数据正态性。进行独立t检验以评估两种塑料球之间的动态弹性和击球效果差异。结果表明,红双喜D40+和尼塔库40+的反弹速度和递减率均分别随下落速度的增加而增加。在高速下落时,红双喜D40+和尼塔库40+之间的动态弹性存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。在反手加转弧圈球击球过程中,两种新型材料无缝塑料球的球速和旋转速度也存在显著差异(分别为p = 0.041,p = 0.022),且红双喜D40+的球速和旋转速度高于尼塔库40+球。与红双喜D40+相比,尼塔库40+的反弹速度更快、反弹高度更高、动态弹性更好。因此,在相同击球条件下,击打尼塔库40+球时,运动员需要增加挥拍距离并加大击球力度以提高球速和旋转速度;增加发球的旋转并降低球反弹高度。