Suppr超能文献

肌少症性肥胖的流行率:不同诊断标准的比较及最佳筛查方法的探索。

Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity: comparison of different diagnostic criteria and exploration of optimal screening methods.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05378-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite concerns on the adverse health outcomes of sarcopenic obesity (SO), exploration regarding the applicability of different diagnostic criteria and the optimal screening methods is still lacking. This study aims to compare the prevalence and diagnostic agreement of SO under four diagnostic criteria in Chongming, Shanghai, China and assess the diagnostic value of nine screening methods for SO.

METHODS

The study population included older people aged ≥ 65 years. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia-2019 (AWGS-2019) was used to diagnose sarcopenia. Obesity was defined using percentage of body fat (PBF), percent of body fat exceeding the 60th percentile (60% PBF), body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). The four diagnostic criteria for SO were AWGS + PBF, AWGS + 60% PBF, AWGS + BMI and AWGS + WC. Nine screening methods were the sarcopenia questionnaire [the questionnaire with five items to screen for sarcopenia (SARC-F), the addition of calf circumference to the SARC-F (SARC-CalF), and the addition of elderly age and BMI to the SARC-F (SARC-F + EBM)] combined with commonly used obesity indicators. Cohen's kappa compared agreement between diagnostic criteria, whilst sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) compared the diagnostic value of nine screening methods.

RESULTS

A total of 1407 older people were enrolled. The prevalence of SO ranged from 0.3 to 9.9%. The highest agreement between AWGS + 60% PBF and AWGS + PBF. When the AWGS + PBF was used as the 'gold standard' (due to its high agreement and high prevalence), SARC-CalF + PBF had the highest AUC value, and SARC-F + BMI had the highest sensitivity. The recommended cut-off values for SARC-F + BMI are SARC-F ≥ 1 score and BMI ≥ 19.845 kg/m², and the recommended cut-off values for SARC-CalF + PBF are SARC-CalF ≥ 5 score and PBF ≥ 34.55%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of SO varied greatly amongst the four diagnostic criteria. AWGS + PBF is recommended for diagnosing SO in older people. SARC-F + BMI and SARC-CalF + PBF can be used as screening methods for SO.

摘要

背景和目的

尽管人们对肌少症合并肥胖(SO)的不良健康结局存在担忧,但对于不同诊断标准的适用性和最佳筛查方法的探索仍存在不足。本研究旨在比较四种诊断标准在中国上海崇明地区诊断 SO 的患病率和诊断一致性,并评估九种 SO 筛查方法的诊断价值。

方法

研究人群包括年龄≥65 岁的老年人。采用亚洲肌少症工作组 2019 年(AWGS-2019)标准诊断肌少症。肥胖采用体脂百分比(PBF)、体脂百分比超过第 60 百分位(60% PBF)、体质指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)进行定义。SO 的四种诊断标准为 AWGS+PBF、AWGS+60% PBF、AWGS+BMI 和 AWGS+WC。九种筛查方法为肌少症问卷[五项筛查肌少症的问卷(SARC-F)、在 SARC-F 基础上增加小腿围度(SARC-CalF)、在 SARC-F 基础上增加老年和 BMI(SARC-F+EBM)]与常用肥胖指标相结合。采用 Cohen's kappa 比较诊断标准间的一致性,采用灵敏度、特异度、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)比较九种筛查方法的诊断价值。

结果

共纳入 1407 名老年人。SO 的患病率为 0.3%至 9.9%。AWGS+60% PBF 与 AWGS+PBF 之间的一致性最高。当 AWGS+PBF 作为“金标准”(由于其具有较高的一致性和较高的患病率)时,SARC-CalF+PBF 的 AUC 值最高,SARC-F+BMI 的灵敏度最高。SARC-F+BMI 的推荐截断值为 SARC-F≥1 分和 BMI≥19.845 kg/m²,SARC-CalF+PBF 的推荐截断值为 SARC-CalF≥5 分和 PBF≥34.55%。

结论

四种诊断标准下 SO 的患病率差异较大。AWGS+PBF 用于诊断老年人 SO。SARC-F+BMI 和 SARC-CalF+PBF 可作为 SO 的筛查方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf54/11443907/ffbeca3953f3/12877_2024_5378_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验