Ito Akihiro, Ishizaka Masahiro, Kobayashi Kaoru, Sawaya Yohei, Hara Tsuyoshi, Nagasaka Yoshihisa, Yakabi Akihiro, Watanabe Miyoko, Kubo Akira
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, International University of Health and Welfare: 2600-1 Kitakanemaru, Otawara-shi, Tochigi 324-8501, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Mar;33(3):241-245. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.241. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
[Purpose] To identify changes in the efficacy of the Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) screening tools and the differences between the different screening tools following the updates from the AWGS 2014 to 2019 criteria for community-dwelling older adults. [Participants and Methods] We included 139 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years. We assessed the lower calf circumference, SARC-F score, SARC-CalF score, skeletal muscle mass, grip strength, and gait speed. Moreover, we investigated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and area under the ROC curve of the lower calf circumference, SARC-F score, and SARC-CalF score using the AWGS 2014 and 2019 criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis. [Results] The prevalences of sarcopenia were 10.8% and 12.9%, and 5.0% using the AWGS 2014 and 2019, and 2019 severe sarcopenia diagnostic criteria, respectively. Using AWGS 2014 criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of lower calf circumference, SARC-F score, and SARC-CalF score, were 86.7% and 62.1%, 13.3% and 91.9%, and 66.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Using AWGS 2019 criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of lower calf circumference, SARC-F score, and SARC-CalF score were 83.3% and 62.8%, 11.1% and 91.7%, and 66.7% and 81.8%, respectively. Using AWGS 2019 severe sarcopenia criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of lower calf circumference, SARC-F score, and SARC-CalF score were 100% and 59.8%, 14.3% and 91.7%, and 71.4% and 78.0%, respectively. [Conclusion] All screening tools used in AWGS 2014 and 2019 were similar in terms of efficacy; however, the AWGS 2019 severe sarcopenia criteria had different characteristics.
[目的] 确定亚洲肌少症工作组(AWGS)筛查工具在2014年至2019年社区居住老年人标准更新后的效能变化以及不同筛查工具之间的差异。[参与者和方法] 我们纳入了139名年龄≥65岁的社区居住老年人。我们评估了小腿围、SARC-F评分、SARC-CalF评分、骨骼肌质量、握力和步速。此外,我们使用AWGS 2014年和2019年肌少症诊断标准,研究了小腿围、SARC-F评分和SARC-CalF评分的敏感性、特异性、似然比和ROC曲线下面积。[结果] 使用AWGS 2014年、2019年以及2019年严重肌少症诊断标准时,肌少症的患病率分别为10.8%、12.9%和5.0%。使用AWGS 2014年标准时,小腿围、SARC-F评分和SARC-CalF评分的敏感性和特异性分别为86.7%和62.1%、13.3%和91.9%、66.7%和80.6%。使用AWGS 2019年标准时,小腿围、SARC-F评分和SARC-CalF评分的敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和62.8%、11.1%和91.7%、66.7%和81.8%。使用AWGS 2019年严重肌少症标准时,小腿围、SARC-F评分和SARC-CalF评分的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和59.8%、14.3%和91.7%、71.4%和78.0%。[结论] AWGS 2014年和2019年使用的所有筛查工具在效能方面相似;然而,AWGS 2019年严重肌少症标准具有不同的特征。