Totoki Takaaki, Koami Hiroyuki, Makino Yuto, Wada Takeshi, Ito Takashi, Yamakawa Kazuma, Iba Toshiaki
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Advanced Emergency Care Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Thromb J. 2024 Sep 30;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00653-0.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that affects 49 million people annually. Managing sepsis-associated coagulopathy poses a significant challenge due to its high mortality rates in intensive care. Recent reports suggest that administering heparin may offer potential survival benefits in sepsis and coronavirus disease cases. However, there is currently no established evidence supporting the use of heparin for sepsis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of heparin administration in patients with sepsis.
A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The searches included MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Japanese databases up to January 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized control trials (RCTs) involving adult sepsis patients receiving heparin. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and the data extraction included 28-day mortality and bleeding complications.
Out of 1733 initial articles, only three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis, which included 426 patients, showed no significant difference in 28-day and in-hospital mortality between the heparin and control groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.24). Subgroup analysis of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients (n = 109) also did not show a significant reduction in mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.51-1.38). Heterogeneity was zero, and no publication bias was observed. Additionally, there was significant difference in bleeding complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.99, p = 0.047).
This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit of heparin administration in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Further investigation into the potential benefits of heparin is warranted. Moreover, the analysis revealed no increase in bleeding risks with heparin administration; instead, a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding was noted.
This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (registration: CRD42023385091).
脓毒症是一种危及生命的疾病,每年影响4900万人。由于其在重症监护中的高死亡率,管理脓毒症相关凝血病构成了重大挑战。最近的报告表明,使用肝素可能在脓毒症和冠状病毒病病例中提供潜在的生存益处。然而,目前尚无确凿证据支持在脓毒症中使用肝素。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估肝素治疗脓毒症患者的疗效。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。检索截至2023年1月的MEDLINE、Cochrane和日本数据库。纳入标准包括涉及接受肝素治疗的成年脓毒症患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用RoB2评估偏倚风险,数据提取包括28天死亡率和出血并发症。
在1733篇初始文章中,只有三项研究符合纳入标准。该分析纳入了426名患者,结果显示肝素组和对照组在28天和住院死亡率方面无显著差异(风险比[RR]=0.86,95%置信区间[CI]:0.60-1.24)。脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)患者(n=109)的亚组分析也未显示死亡率显著降低(RR=0.84,95%CI:0.51-1.38)。异质性为零,未观察到发表偏倚。此外,出血并发症存在显著差异(RR=0.49,95%CI:0.24-0.99,p=0.047)。
这项荟萃分析未证明肝素治疗脓毒症及脓毒症相关DIC患者有生存益处。有必要进一步研究肝素的潜在益处。此外,分析显示使用肝素不会增加出血风险;相反,出血风险显著降低。
本综述已在PROSPERO预注册(注册号:CRD42023385091)。