• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自杀方式与严重精神疾病:一项系统综述与荟萃分析

Suicide methods and severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Trott M, Suetani S, Arnautovska U, Kisely S, Kar Ray M, Theodoros T, Le V, Leske S, Lu M, Soole R, Warren N, Siskind D

机构信息

UQ Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Physical and Mental Health Research Stream, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Apr;151(4):467-484. doi: 10.1111/acps.13759. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1111/acps.13759
PMID:39350700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11884913/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People with severe mental illness (SMI) have a higher risk of suicide compared with the general population. However, variations in suicide methods between people with different SMIs have not been examined. The aim of this pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42022351748) systematic review was to pool the odds of people with SMI who die by suicide versus those with no SMI, stratified by suicide method.

METHODS

Searches were conducted on December 11, 2023 across PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Embase. Eligible studies were those that reported suicide deaths stratified by SMI and suicide methods. Studies were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis, and risk of bias was measured by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

RESULTS

After screening, 12 studies were eligible (n = 380,523). Compared with those with no SMI, people with schizophrenia had 3.38× higher odds of jumping from heights (95% CI: 2.08-5.50), 1.93× higher odds of drowning (95% CI: 1.50-2.48). People with bipolar disorder also had 3.2× higher odds of jumping from heights (95% CI: 2.70-3.78). Finally, people with major depression had 3.11× higher odds of drug overdose (95% CI: 1.53-6.31), 2.11× higher odds of jumping from heights (95% CI: 1.93-2.31), and 2.33× lower odds of dying by firearms (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56). No studies were classified as high risk of bias, and no outcomes had high levels of imprecision or indirectness.

CONCLUSION

These findings could inform lethal means counselling practices in this population. Additionally individual, clinical, community and public health interventions for people with SMI should prioritise, where feasible, means restriction including access to heights or drugs to overdose.

摘要

引言

与普通人群相比,患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人自杀风险更高。然而,不同严重精神疾病患者的自杀方式差异尚未得到研究。这项预先注册(PROSPERO CRD42022351748)的系统评价旨在汇总按自杀方式分层的严重精神疾病患者与无严重精神疾病患者自杀死亡的比值比。

方法

于2023年12月11日在PubMed、PsycInfo、CINAHL和Embase数据库进行检索。纳入的合格研究是那些报告了按严重精神疾病和自杀方式分层的自杀死亡情况的研究。研究采用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总,并通过乔安娜·布里格斯研究所清单评估偏倚风险。

结果

筛选后,12项研究符合要求(n = 380,523)。与无严重精神疾病的人相比,精神分裂症患者从高处跳下的比值比高3.38倍(95%可信区间:2.08 - 5.50),溺水的比值比高1.93倍(95%可信区间:1.50 - 2.48)。双相情感障碍患者从高处跳下的比值比也高3.2倍(95%可信区间:2.70 - 3.78)。最后,重度抑郁症患者药物过量的比值比高3.11倍(95%可信区间:1.53 - 6.31),从高处跳下的比值比高2.11倍(95%可信区间:1.93 - 2.31),死于枪击的比值比低2.33倍(比值比 = 0.43,95%可信区间:0.33 - 0.56)。没有研究被归类为高偏倚风险,也没有结果存在高度不精确或间接性。

结论

这些发现可为该人群的致命手段咨询实践提供参考。此外,针对严重精神疾病患者的个体、临床、社区和公共卫生干预措施应在可行的情况下优先考虑限制手段,包括限制接触高处或可用于过量用药的药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/efb023136dee/ACPS-151-467-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/89a73db4ce78/ACPS-151-467-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/f05d19a75871/ACPS-151-467-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/3b9c19763199/ACPS-151-467-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/b9f3e8c05fa1/ACPS-151-467-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/cca7e690d71a/ACPS-151-467-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/efb023136dee/ACPS-151-467-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/89a73db4ce78/ACPS-151-467-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/f05d19a75871/ACPS-151-467-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/3b9c19763199/ACPS-151-467-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/b9f3e8c05fa1/ACPS-151-467-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/cca7e690d71a/ACPS-151-467-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261a/11884913/efb023136dee/ACPS-151-467-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Suicide methods and severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.自杀方式与严重精神疾病:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Apr;151(4):467-484. doi: 10.1111/acps.13759. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
The development of type 2 diabetes management in people with severe mental illness in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2001 to 2015.丹麦首都大区 2001 至 2015 年期间严重精神疾病患者 2 型糖尿病管理的发展。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Mar;149(3):219-233. doi: 10.1111/acps.13650. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
8
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Relationship Between Hopelessness, Alexithymia, Mind Wandering, Rumination, and Clinical Features in Patients with Bipolar Disorder.探究双相情感障碍患者的绝望感、述情障碍、思维游荡、沉思与临床特征之间的关系。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 2;15(6):596. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060596.
2
Trends in the complexity of self-harm hospitalisations over 11 years at a major regional hospital in Victoria, Australia: a retrospective study.澳大利亚维多利亚州一家大型地区医院11年间自残住院治疗复杂性的趋势:一项回顾性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 30;16:1573824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1573824. eCollection 2025.
3
Suicidal risk in patients with aggression in schizophrenia: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual-level risk factors for suicide mortality in the general population: an umbrella review.一般人群中自杀死亡率的个体风险因素:伞式综述。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Nov;8(11):e868-e877. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00207-4.
2
Suicide and prevalence of mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world data on case-control psychological autopsy studies.自杀与精神障碍的流行率:基于病例对照心理解剖研究的世界数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Nov;329:115492. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115492. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
From suicide surveillance to restricting access to means: A time series study of suicide prevention at the Story Bridge.
精神分裂症中具有攻击性患者的自杀风险:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 24;16:1560699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1560699. eCollection 2025.
从自杀监测到限制手段获取:故事桥自杀预防的时间序列研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;57(8):1184-1186. doi: 10.1177/00048674231177960. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
Excess mortality in severe mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-regression.严重精神障碍患者的超额死亡率:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 May;149:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.02.036. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
The lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.自杀方法的致死性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.054. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Suicide and Psychosis: Results From a Population-Based Cohort of Suicide Death (N = 4380).自杀与精神病:一项基于人群的自杀死亡队列研究(N=4380)的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):457-462. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab113.
7
Contributing factors to suicide: Political, social, cultural and economic.自杀的促成因素:政治、社会、文化和经济。
Prev Med. 2021 Nov;152(Pt 1):106498. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106498. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Predictive Factors Associated With Methods of Suicide: The Korean National Investigations of Suicide Victims (The KNIGHTS Study).与自杀方式相关的预测因素:韩国自杀受害者全国调查(KNIGHTS研究)
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 12;12:651327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.651327. eCollection 2021.
9
Suicide rates among people with serious mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.严重精神疾病患者的自杀率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):351-361. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001549. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.