Nadreen Yasmeen M, Vrouwenvelder Johannes S, Saikaly Pascal E, Gonzalez-Gil Graciela
Water Desalination and Reuse Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Environmental Science and Engineering Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1441142. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1441142. eCollection 2024.
The bottled drinking water market has seen significant growth and diversification, yet the selection criteria lack scientific basis, as all must adhere to stringent health standards. Prior studies predominantly focused on chemical quality, with limited assessments of microbial quality using methods prone to underestimation. Moreover, insufficient research explores the impact of packaging materials and temperatures optimal for mesophilic growth on microbial quality. To understand the unique characteristics and justify the distinction among different types of bottled waters, a comprehensive analysis encompassing both chemical and microbiological aspects is imperative. Addressing these gaps, our study examines 19 diverse bottled water brands comprising purified, mineral, artesian, and sparkling water types from Saudi Arabia and abroad. Our findings reveal distinct chemical compositions among bottled waters, with notable variations across types. Flow cytometry analysis reveals significant differences in bacterial content among water types, with natural mineral waters having the highest concentrations and treated purified waters the lowest. Bacterial content in plastic-bottled mineral water suggests it may be higher than in glass-bottled water. Flow cytometry fingerprints highlight separate microbial communities for purified and mineral waters. Additionally, temperatures favorable for mesophilic growth reveal varying microbial responses among different types of bottled waters. Some variation is also observed in mineral water bottled in plastic versus glass, suggesting potential differences that warrant further investigation. 16S rRNA gene sequencing identifies unique microbial taxa among different mineral waters. Overall, our study underscores that all bottled waters meet health regulations. Furthermore, the combined chemical and microbial profiles may serve as authenticity indicators for distinct bottled water types. This study can serve as a basis for future research on the environmental impact of bottled water transportation, suggesting that locally produced water may offer a more sustainable option.
瓶装饮用水市场经历了显著的增长和多样化,但选择标准缺乏科学依据,因为所有瓶装饮用水都必须符合严格的健康标准。先前的研究主要集中在化学质量方面,而使用容易低估微生物质量的方法对微生物质量进行的评估有限。此外,对于包装材料以及有利于嗜温菌生长的温度对微生物质量的影响,研究也不够充分。为了了解不同类型瓶装水的独特特征并证明它们之间的差异是合理的,进行涵盖化学和微生物两方面的综合分析势在必行。为填补这些空白,我们的研究调查了19个不同的瓶装水品牌,包括来自沙特阿拉伯国内外的纯净水、矿泉水、自流井水和气泡水。我们的研究结果显示,不同瓶装水的化学成分各不相同,不同类型之间存在显著差异。流式细胞术分析表明,不同类型水中的细菌含量存在显著差异,天然矿泉水的细菌浓度最高,经过处理的纯净水最低。塑料瓶装矿泉水中的细菌含量表明,其可能高于玻璃瓶装矿泉水。流式细胞术指纹图谱突出显示了纯净水和矿泉水各自不同的微生物群落。此外,有利于嗜温菌生长的温度表明,不同类型的瓶装水对微生物的反应各不相同。在塑料瓶装和玻璃瓶装的矿泉水中也观察到了一些差异,这表明可能存在值得进一步研究的潜在差异。16S rRNA基因测序确定了不同矿泉水之间独特的微生物分类群。总体而言,我们的研究强调所有瓶装水均符合健康规定。此外,化学和微生物特征相结合可作为不同类型瓶装水的真实性指标。这项研究可为未来关于瓶装水运输对环境影响的研究提供基础,表明本地生产的水可能是更具可持续性的选择。
Front Microbiol. 2024-9-16
Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2011
J Sci Food Agric. 2023-2
Sci Total Environ. 2019-6-15
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2008-6
Environ Sci Technol. 2007-5-15
Sci Total Environ. 1999-12-15
Nat Commun. 2024-5-9
Water Res. 2023-4-15
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022-4
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021-8-11
J Environ Manage. 2021-2-15