• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对奥地利样本的MES的翻译与验证。

The translation and validation of the MES for an Austrian sample.

作者信息

Jordan Myriam N, Sarantaki Antigoni, Diamanti Athina, Vivilaki Victoria

机构信息

Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 9;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191394. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.18332/ejm/191394
PMID:39351399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440047/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Empathy plays an important role in midwifery care, not only for the women but also for midwives. The Midwifery Empathy Scale (MES) was developed to assess the empathy levels of midwives and midwifery students. The purpose of this study was the translation and validation of the MES for an Austrian sample.

METHODS

A total of 277 midwives working in Austria completed the questionnaire of the MES. The psychometric measurements that were performed included explanatory factor analysis using a varimax rotation and principal components analysis. Moreover, the internal consistency of the MES was assessed with reliability coefficients. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and a Bartlett's test of sphericity were carried out.

RESULTS

Principal components analysis showed seven orthogonal factors. KMO measure of sample adequacy = 0.724 and Bartlett's test of sphericity = 1058.904 (df=231, p<0.0001). The MES showed an acceptable overall internal consistency: Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.721 and the Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.611. The findings of our study confirm the multidimensionality of MES, demonstrating a seven-factor structure which contained subscales reflecting empathy and emotional connection. The mean total score of Austrian midwives' responses to the MES was 44.80 with scores ranging from 24 to 81.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the German version of the Midwifery Empathy Scale is a reliable instrument for evaluating the empathy levels of midwives and midwifery students in Austria. The German MES could be used in the selection and education of future midwives as well as in connection with empathy trainings of midwives.

摘要

引言

同理心在助产护理中起着重要作用,这不仅对产妇而言如此,对助产士来说同样重要。助产士同理心量表(MES)旨在评估助产士及助产专业学生的同理心水平。本研究的目的是对MES进行翻译并在奥地利样本中进行验证。

方法

共有277名在奥地利工作的助产士完成了MES问卷。所进行的心理测量包括使用方差最大化旋转的解释性因素分析和主成分分析。此外,通过信度系数评估MES的内部一致性。进行了Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)抽样适当性度量和巴特利特球形度检验。

结果

主成分分析显示有七个正交因子。KMO抽样适当性度量 = 0.724,巴特利特球形度检验 = 1058.904(自由度 = 231,p < 0.0001)。MES显示出可接受的总体内部一致性:克朗巴哈系数为0.721,古特曼折半系数为0.611。我们的研究结果证实了MES的多维性,呈现出一个七因子结构,其中包含反映同理心和情感联系的子量表。奥地利助产士对MES回答的平均总分是44.80,分数范围为24至81。

结论

本研究表明,德语版的助产士同理心量表是评估奥地利助产士及助产专业学生同理心水平的可靠工具。德语版MES可用于未来助产士的选拔和教育,以及与助产士的同理心培训相关的工作中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a4/11440047/3416aa50871f/EJM-8-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a4/11440047/ffd97a73d310/EJM-8-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a4/11440047/3416aa50871f/EJM-8-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a4/11440047/ffd97a73d310/EJM-8-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a4/11440047/3416aa50871f/EJM-8-54-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The translation and validation of the MES for an Austrian sample.针对奥地利样本的MES的翻译与验证。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 9;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191394. eCollection 2024.
2
A novel version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-3: Turkish validation study.哥本哈根心理社会问卷-3的新版本:土耳其语验证研究。
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2019;74(6):297-309. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2018.1538095. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
3
Validation of the Georgian version of a Stigma Scale of Epilepsy.验证《癫痫耻辱量表》的格鲁吉亚语版本。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Nov;148:109502. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109502. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Nursing and midwifery students' attitudes towards addressing patient sexual health in their future profession: Polish adaptation and validation of the students' attitudes towards addressing sexual health extended questionnaire (SA-SH-Ext).护理和助产学专业学生对未来职业中解决患者性健康问题的态度:对解决性健康扩展问卷(SA-SH-Ext)的学生态度的波兰语改编和验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0300515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300515. eCollection 2024.
5
Developing and testing the EPICC Spiritual Care Competency Self-Assessment Tool for student nurses and midwives.开发并测试适用于护生和助产士的 EPICC 精神关怀能力自我评估工具。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(7-8):1148-1162. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16261. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Measurement of empathy among health professionals during Syrian crisis using the Syrian empathy scale.运用叙利亚同理心量表测量叙利亚危机期间卫生专业人员的同理心。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 29;21(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02835-0.
7
Development and Testing of the Psychometric Properties of the Attitude Towards Medical Device-related Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Questionnaire.医疗设备相关压疮/损伤态度问卷心理测量学特性的开发与测试
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Mar;67(3):30-35.
8
Caregiver strain among patients of palliative care in Sri Lanka: validation of modified caregiver strain index - Sinhala version.斯里兰卡姑息治疗患者的照顾者压力:改良照顾者压力指数-Sinhala 版本的验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Nov 4;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01270-w.
9
Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.《咨询和关系共情(CARE)量表韩文版的有效性和信度》。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 26;22(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03478-5.
10
Psychometric evaluation of a new instrument to hookah tobacco smoking-related factors in the Iranian female university students based on the Extended Parallel Process Model.基于扩展平行过程模型对一种用于评估伊朗女大学生水烟吸食相关因素的新工具进行心理测量学评估。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Apr 29;13:138. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_437_23. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of empathy training given to midwives on the empathic communication skills of midwives and the birth satisfaction of mothers giving birth with the help of these midwives: A quasi-experimental study.同理心训练对助产士同理心沟通技巧及助产士帮助分娩产妇分娩满意度的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;27(4):858-867. doi: 10.1111/jep.13523. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
2
Midwives' perceptions of being 'with woman': a phenomenological study.助产士对“陪伴女性”的看法:一项现象学研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2548-4.
3
Effect of expert-patient teaching on empathy in nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.
专家-患者教学对护生同理心的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Jun 27;12:457-467. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S208427. eCollection 2019.
4
"It's what midwifery is all about": Western Australian midwives' experiences of being 'with woman' during labour and birth in the known midwife model.“这就是产科学的全部内容”:在已知的助产士模式下,西澳大利亚助产士在分娩过程中“陪伴妇女”的体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2144-z.
5
Childbirth-specific patient-reported outcomes as predictors of hospital satisfaction.分娩相关患者报告结局对医院满意度的预测作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):201.e1-201.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.093. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
6
Cultural empathy in midwifery students: Assessment of an education program.助产士学生的文化共情:教育方案评估。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Nov;70:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.围手术期与疼痛医学领域问卷的开发、翻译及验证指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
8
Empathy and spiritual care in midwifery practice: Contributing to women's enhanced birth experiences.助产实践中的同理心与精神关怀:助力提升女性分娩体验
Women Birth. 2015 Dec;28(4):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 May 18.
9
Empathy levels among health professional students: a cross-sectional study at two universities in Australia.健康专业学生的同理心水平:澳大利亚两所大学的横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 May 3;5:107-13. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S57569. eCollection 2014.
10
To be or not to be empathic: the combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice.是否具有同理心:同理心关怀和观点采择在理解全科医疗倦怠中的联合作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 23;15:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-15.