Fraser R C, Gosling J T
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 7;291(6509):1613-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6509.1613.
The information that is supplied to general practitioners by the Prescription Pricing Authority and family practitioner committees has severe limitations if used for self audit of prescribing. We studied the demand for and the extent to which general practitioners would collaborate in developing a system for providing more pertinent information about patterns of personal and practice prescribing. One hundred and eighty two doctors (36% of respondents to a questionnaire) who wished to learn more about their repeat prescribing were invited to help to generate this information and to create profiles of their personal prescribing rates based on a denominator of doctor-patient contacts. Nearly all of them translated intention into participation and also recruited 28 more doctors, since all partners in a practice had to take part. Overall, 202 doctors (40%) took part, 83% of whom participated in the combined study of repeat prescribing and rate of prescribing and 17% in the repeat prescribing exercise only. The examples of the new profiles that are provided show a more accurate representation of personal and practice prescribing patterns, differentiate between face to face contacts and repeat prescriptions, and are likely to stimulate improvements in personal or practice prescribing. We believe that this system should be offered to all practices in the United Kingdom.
如果将处方定价机构和家庭医生委员会提供给全科医生的信息用于处方自我审核,存在严重局限性。我们研究了全科医生对开发一个能提供更多关于个人及诊所处方模式相关信息系统的需求及合作意愿。182名希望进一步了解其重复处方情况的医生(占问卷受访者的36%)被邀请协助生成此类信息,并根据医患接触次数这一分母创建个人处方率档案。几乎所有人都将意愿转化为了实际参与,还另外招募了28名医生,因为诊所的所有合伙人都必须参与。总体而言,202名医生(40%)参与其中,其中83%参与了重复处方及处方率的综合研究,17%仅参与了重复处方研究。所提供的新档案示例更准确地反映了个人及诊所的处方模式,区分了面对面接触和重复处方,且可能会促进个人或诊所处方的改善。我们认为应向英国所有诊所提供这一系统。