Taylor R J, Bond C M
Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen.
Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jun;41(347):244-8.
The aim of this study was to describe the types of drugs prescribed by general practitioners in a sample of initial (rather than repeat) prescriptions, the additions and deletions made to a doctor's repertory and the factors influencing these changes. The method used here enabled repeat prescriptions to be excluded as these are an inaccurate reflection of the current habits of the prescriber. A total of 201 (74%) of the principal general practitioners in the Grampian region participated. Data were obtained by substituting special prescription pads containing duplicate forms which allowed additional data to be recorded at the time of prescribing, including perceived influences that had resulted in changes from established choices of drug therapy. A sample of 100 forms were collected on seven occasions from each doctor over a one year sample period. Prescribers on average selected a preparation that they had only started to use within the last 12 months (that is newly adopted to their repertory) in 5.4% of initial prescriptions. These changes mostly involved antibiotics and analgesics and were occasioned mainly by the influence of the 'limited list' regulations, pharmaceutical company representatives and hospital specialists. We conclude that general practitioners were not unduly influenced by commercial sources of information, and that their prescribing habits were stable and conservative. The paper presents a case for the separate analysis of initial and repeat prescriptions as an essential step in producing more informative data on prescribing.
本研究的目的是描述全科医生在初诊(而非复诊)处方样本中所开药物的类型、医生处方药品清单的增减情况以及影响这些变化的因素。此处采用的方法能够排除复诊处方,因为复诊处方不能准确反映开方者当前的用药习惯。格兰扁地区共有201名(74%)主要全科医生参与了研究。数据是通过使用含有复写联的特殊处方笺收集的,这种处方笺允许在开方时记录额外的数据,包括导致从既定药物治疗选择发生变化的感知影响因素。在一年的抽样期内,从每位医生那里分七次收集了100份处方样本。开方者在5.4%的初诊处方中平均选择了一种他们在过去12个月内才开始使用的制剂(即新加入其处方药品清单的)。这些变化大多涉及抗生素和镇痛药,主要是受“限制清单”规定、制药公司代表和医院专家的影响。我们得出结论,全科医生并未受到商业信息来源的过度影响,而且他们的开方习惯稳定且保守。本文提出了将初诊处方和复诊处方分开分析的理由,认为这是生成更具信息量的处方数据的关键步骤。