Suppr超能文献

使用盖伊医院评分法对颅内出血进行临床诊断。

Clinical diagnosis of intracranial haemorrhage using Guy's Hospital score.

作者信息

Sandercock P A, Allen C M, Corston R N, Harrison M J, Warlow C P

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 14;291(6510):1675-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6510.1675.

Abstract

We tested the Guy's Hospital stroke diagnostic score using the clinical data from two independent samples of patients with acute stroke. These were 228 patients from the Oxfordshire community stroke project and 130 referred to the National Hospital for Nervous Diseases in London. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography or necropsy in each case. The optimum cut off point on the clinical score for the differentiation of intracranial haemorrhage from infarction was found to be the same for both the patients in our study and those from whose data the score was derived originally. Set at this level, the score achieved a sensitivity for the diagnosis of haemorrhage of 81% and 88% in the patients from Oxford and London, respectively. In those from Oxford infarction was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 78% with an overall predictive accuracy of 78% with an overall London the sensitivity for infarction was also 78% with an overall predictive accuracy of 82%. When it is essential to exclude intracerebral blood before starting treatment in the small proportion of patients with stroke who require anticoagulation the Guy's Hospital score is not sufficiently accurate to replace computed tomography. The score is, however, the most accurate clinical means of differentiating haemorrhage from infarction as the cause of stroke. It is suggested that it should be used as a screening test in epidemiological studies and in large scale trials of low risk treatment for the secondary prevention of stroke when computed tomography in all cases is impracticable.

摘要

我们使用来自两个独立急性中风患者样本的临床数据,对盖伊医院中风诊断评分进行了测试。这些样本包括来自牛津郡社区中风项目的228名患者以及转诊至伦敦国立神经病医院的130名患者。每例患者的诊断均通过计算机断层扫描或尸检得以证实。我们发现,对于我们研究中的患者以及最初得出该评分所依据数据的患者而言,用于区分颅内出血与梗死的临床评分最佳切点是相同的。设定为此水平时,该评分在牛津患者和伦敦患者中诊断出血的敏感度分别为81%和88%。在牛津患者中,诊断梗死的敏感度为78%,总体预测准确率为78%;在伦敦患者中,诊断梗死的敏感度同样为78%,总体预测准确率为82%。对于一小部分需要抗凝治疗的中风患者,在开始治疗前必须排除脑内出血的情况下,盖伊医院评分的准确性不足以替代计算机断层扫描。然而,该评分是区分出血与梗死作为中风病因的最准确的临床方法。建议在流行病学研究以及中风二级预防低风险治疗大规模试验中,当对所有病例进行计算机断层扫描不可行时,将其用作筛查测试。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Validation of Siriraj Stroke Score in southeast Nigeria.西丽拉吉卒中评分在尼日利亚东南部的验证。
Int J Gen Med. 2015 Oct 23;8:349-53. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S87293. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical distinction of cerebral haemorrhage and cerebral infarction.脑出血与脑梗死的临床鉴别
Postgrad Med J. 1980 Sep;56(659):629-32. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.56.659.629.
2
Accuracy of bedside diagnosis in stroke.
Stroke. 1981 May-Jun;12(3):288-93. doi: 10.1161/01.str.12.3.288.
4
The diagnostic accuracy of CSF analyses in stroke.
Acta Med Scand. 1983;214(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1983.tb08563.x.
5
Recognition and management of lacunar strokes.腔隙性卒中的识别与管理
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Sep 17;287(6395):777-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6395.777.
8
The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry.
Neurology. 1978 Aug;28(8):754-62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.28.8.754.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验