Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 4th Floor - 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Oct 1;19(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01449-5.
Most participants reported a positive perception of bone active medication despite sustaining a fracture while taking the medication, reporting medication side effects, or having a healthcare provider stop the prescription. Participants did not appear to connect the medication to fracture risk, suggesting this connection should be emphasized by healthcare providers.
Our purpose was to examine perceptions about bone active medication from individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication.
In this qualitative description study, eligible participants were those who attended an Osteoporosis Canada education session, and reported sustaining a previous fragility fracture and receiving a prescription for bone active medication. We conducted one-on-one interviews and analyzed the data using the analytic hierarchy approach.
We interviewed 32 female participants (age range 58-89 years). Based on our analysis, two themes were developed: (1) most participants spoke positively about bone active medication, indicating they were willing to start, or continue to take, their medication. Positive perceptions were held by participants who sustained a fracture while taking bone active medication, participants whose healthcare provider had stopped the prescription, and participants who reported side effects from the medication; (2) most participants did not discuss bone active medication in relation to their fracture and did not appear to connect the medication to the concept of fracture risk. Instead, participants talked about the medication in relation to bone health in general, or to bone density.
Participants appeared to have positive perceptions of bone active medication, despite sustaining a fracture while taking the medication, reporting medication side effects, or having a healthcare provider stop the prescription. Participants did not connect bone active medication to the concept of fracture risk, illustrating the need for healthcare providers to emphasize the connection between fracture risk and bone active medication.
尽管在服用药物时发生骨折、报告药物副作用或医疗保健提供者停止处方,大多数参与者仍对骨活性药物有积极的看法。参与者似乎并未将药物与骨折风险联系起来,这表明医疗保健提供者应强调这种联系。
我们的目的是检查患有脆性骨折和骨活性药物处方的个体对骨活性药物的看法。
在这项定性描述研究中,合格的参与者是那些参加过加拿大骨质疏松症教育课程并报告先前发生过脆性骨折且开有骨活性药物处方的人。我们进行了一对一的访谈,并使用分析层次方法分析数据。
我们采访了 32 名女性参与者(年龄 58-89 岁)。根据我们的分析,确定了两个主题:(1)大多数参与者对骨活性药物评价积极,表明他们愿意开始或继续服用药物。积极的看法来自于正在服用骨活性药物时发生骨折的参与者、医疗保健提供者停止处方的参与者以及报告药物副作用的参与者;(2)大多数参与者没有将骨活性药物与骨折联系起来,也没有将药物与骨折风险联系起来。相反,参与者将药物与一般的骨骼健康或骨密度联系起来。
尽管在服用药物时发生骨折、报告药物副作用或医疗保健提供者停止处方,参与者似乎对骨活性药物有积极的看法。参与者并未将骨活性药物与骨折风险联系起来,这表明医疗保健提供者应强调骨折风险与骨活性药物之间的联系。