Desilets Antoine, Vos Joris L, Katabi Nora, Kuo Fengshen, Nadeem Zaineb, Linxweiler Maximilian, Ostrovnaya Irina, Baxi Shrujal, Dunn Lara A, Sherman Eric J, Pfister David G, Morris Luc G T, Ho Alan L
Head and Neck Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Head and Neck Service and Immunogenomic Oncology Platform, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 2;30(23):5281-5292. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1064.
There is a significant need for effective therapies to treat recurrent/metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). This study evaluated the multitargeted VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regorafenib in patients with R/M ACC.
Patients with progressive R/M ACC were treated with regorafenib until disease progression, consent withdrawal, or excessive toxicity. The co-primary endpoints were best overall response and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Genomic and transcriptomic biomarker analyses were performed in tumors from trial participants.
Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, including 7 (18%) patients with prior VEGFR TKIs. No objective responses were observed. The 6-month PFS was 45%, and the median PFS was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-11.9 months). The presence of either activating NOTCH1 (22%) or KDM6A alterations (24%) was associated with decreased PFS [HR 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-6.1; P = 0.03]. Bulk RNA sequencing of pretreatment tumors revealed that regorafenib clinical benefit (CB; PFS ≥ 6 months; n = 11) was associated with the native enrichment of immune-related signatures. Immune deconvolution revealed a greater degree of macrophage and T-cell infiltration in CB tumors. Tumors from patients with no clinical benefit (NCB; PFS < 6 months; n = 9) had greater expression of signatures related to cell-cycle progression (E2F targets, G2-M checkpoint).
The trial failed to meet the prespecified 6-month PFS and best overall response targets. We hypothesize that TKI efficacy may be reliant upon an interplay between kinase inhibition and the ACC immune microenvironment, whereas programs promoting cell-cycle progression may contribute to TKI resistance. These observations suggest that trials evaluating CDK4/6 inhibition plus a VEGFR TKI should be considered.
对于治疗复发/转移性(R/M)腺样囊性癌(ACC),迫切需要有效的治疗方法。本研究评估了多靶点VEGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)瑞戈非尼在R/M ACC患者中的疗效。
进展期R/M ACC患者接受瑞戈非尼治疗,直至疾病进展、患者撤回知情同意或出现不可耐受的毒性。共同主要终点为最佳总体缓解率和6个月无进展生存期(PFS)。对试验参与者的肿瘤进行基因组和转录组生物标志物分析。
共纳入38例患者,其中7例(18%)曾接受过VEGFR TKI治疗。未观察到客观缓解。6个月PFS为45%,中位PFS为7.2个月(95%置信区间,5.2 - 11.9个月)。激活型NOTCH1(22%)或KDM6A改变(24%)的存在与PFS降低相关[风险比(HR)2.6;95%置信区间(CI),1.1 - 6.1;P = 0.03]。治疗前肿瘤的批量RNA测序显示,瑞戈非尼临床获益(CB;PFS≥6个月;n = 11)与免疫相关特征的天然富集有关。免疫反卷积显示CB肿瘤中巨噬细胞和T细胞浸润程度更高。无临床获益(NCB;PFS < 6个月;n = 9)患者的肿瘤中与细胞周期进展相关的特征(E2F靶点、G2 - M检查点)表达更高。
该试验未达到预先设定的6个月PFS和最佳总体缓解目标。我们推测TKI疗效可能依赖于激酶抑制与ACC免疫微环境之间的相互作用,而促进细胞周期进展的程序可能导致TKI耐药。这些观察结果提示应考虑评估CDK4/6抑制联合VEGFR TKI的试验。