• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产后6 - 8周产妇检查的内容与时间安排:一项混合方法研究

Content and timing of the 6-8 week maternal postnatal check: a mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Macdonald Clare, Cross-Sudworth Fiona, Quinn Laura, MacArthur Christine, Bick Debra, Jones Ellie, Taylor Beck

机构信息

Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2025 Jul 23;9(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0229. Print 2025.

DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0229
PMID:39353734
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2020, the General Medical Services contract requires GP practices in England to offer women a GP appointment 6-8 weeks after birth: the '6-8 week postnatal check' or 'consultation'. Historically, provision of checks was variable, and women still frequently report poor experiences.

AIM

To explore GPs' and women's perspectives of the 6-8 week postnatal check, including key components and timing.

DESIGN & SETTING: A mixed-methods study was undertaken with focus groups of GPs and women, and an online survey of GPs in England.

METHOD

Focus groups explored GPs' and women's experiences of postnatal consultations. An online survey explored GPs' clinical approach, organisation, and improvement potential. Quantitative analysis examined associations between demographics and clinical approach. Thematic framework analysis was used for qualitative data.

RESULTS

In total, 18 women and 14 GPs participated in focus groups; 671 GPs completed the survey. Mental wellbeing and contraception were reported as important topics, although some women were not asked about mental health. GP survey responses indicated most recommendations from national guidance were 'always' or 'very often' covered by most, but not all GPs. Clinical coverage was higher for GPs who used clinical templates, had awareness of guidance, were female, or were a parent. Many GPs ( = 326/670, 49%) needed more time than they were allocated for the consultation ( = 524/670 [78%] allocated ≤15 minutes; = 351/670 [52%] completed in ≤15 minutes).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests GPs are allocated insufficient time for postnatal consultations, with substantial variation in practice. Specifying consultation duration and consideration of template usage in policy may improve care and outcomes for women.

摘要

背景

自2020年以来,英国的全科医疗服务合同要求英格兰的全科医生诊所为产后6至8周的女性提供全科医生预约服务,即“产后6至8周检查”或“会诊”。从历史上看,检查的提供情况参差不齐,女性仍然经常报告体验不佳。

目的

探讨全科医生和女性对产后6至8周检查的看法,包括关键组成部分和时间安排。

设计与背景

采用混合方法进行研究,对全科医生和女性进行焦点小组访谈,并对英格兰的全科医生进行在线调查。

方法

焦点小组探讨了全科医生和女性的产后会诊经历。在线调查探讨了全科医生的临床方法、组织安排和改进潜力。定量分析研究了人口统计学特征与临床方法之间的关联。定性数据采用主题框架分析法。

结果

共有18名女性和14名全科医生参加了焦点小组访谈;671名全科医生完成了调查。心理健康和避孕被报告为重要话题,尽管一些女性未被问及心理健康问题。全科医生的调查回复表明,国家指南中的大多数建议大多数(但不是所有)全科医生“总是”或“非常经常”涵盖。使用临床模板、了解指南、女性或为人父母的全科医生临床覆盖范围更高。许多全科医生(326/670,49%)所需的会诊时间比分配给他们的时间更多(670名中有524名[78%]分配的时间≤15分钟;351/670名[52%]在≤15分钟内完成)。

结论

本研究表明,分配给全科医生进行产后会诊的时间不足,实践中存在很大差异。在政策中明确会诊时长并考虑模板使用情况可能会改善对女性的护理和结果。

相似文献

1
Content and timing of the 6-8 week maternal postnatal check: a mixed-methods study.产后6 - 8周产妇检查的内容与时间安排:一项混合方法研究
BJGP Open. 2025 Jul 23;9(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0229. Print 2025.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
4
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
5
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
6
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal care in primary care for cardiovascular risk reduction.初级保健中的围产期护理以降低心血管风险。
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Mar;25(2):100297. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100297. Epub 2025 Feb 22.